bad history.
when truman took control of steel mills during the korean war, the full house debated articles of impeachment for days, and he were hardly the first President to face serious impeachment moves. w/o any kinda research, am knowing polk, buchanan and tyler also faced serious impeachment.
and gd conflates our cynicism comment with his recognition that push to impeach is not rare. suggest is pointless to choose 'tween candidates from either major party is indeed cynical and is no doubt the silliness putin were hoping to achieve with his election interference in the first place. render americans impotent with polarization and destroy faith in the value o' voting... or even caring. to recognize how since 1843, when the President and House are represented by different parties, impeachment debates become increasing likely is hardly the same conceit.
gd needs take a step back from brink and maybe breath deep for a minute or two. 2019 is not same tired story. the trump situation wherein we got a President open attacking the press as a whole as enemies o' the state while simultaneous discrediting anybody who disagrees with him in government as being part o' ridiculous deep state conspiracy is not ordinary. not even lincoln during civil war went so far to attack Press, and no President has ever been so rabid in attacking our own government institutions w/o any facts to support. this President has purposeful undermined confidence in nonpolitical government bodies and functions to advance his own interests. not normal. to stand idle by and nod sadly at what you see as the everyday dumpster fire which is washington dc is not only cynical but dangerous.
oh, and please note how while impeachment noise is not rare, current wh actions to obstruct Congress and any oversight or investigative effort is unprecedented. past Presidents has used executive privilege in specific and limited instances to bar testimony or release of documents to Congress and/or special counsels, but never has a President simple announced he would refuse to comply with any subpoena efforts. No President has ever made claim to be immune from criminal Investigation by both fed and state.
yeah, impeach efforts is not rare and it goes back further than even truman, but to pretend like the current madness is all par for the course and use such as an excuse to ignore the serious problems staring you in the face is, to be generous, cynical.
again, if trump gets away with this, future Presidents will know they can get away with leveraging their office to get foreign nations to investigate political rivals. such malfeasance woulda' been done secret save for whistleblower. you want that? you accept it? Americans already ignored mueller's dire warnings concerning the precedent set by allowing a Presidential candidate to solicit and accept dirt from a foreign power to affect an election. sadly, too many people were distracted by talk o' witch hunts and claims that trump were unfair targeted (and as it turns out, those claims were complete undermined by recent ig report) to distract from the serious threat staring you in the face. your cynicism has us turn a blind eye to reality that after trump, the only oversight o' an uncooperative President which will have any meaning is in fact impeachment.
am being generous to dismiss self-destructive ambivalence as cynicism.
HA! Good Fun!