rjshae
Members
-
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by rjshae
-
Yes, a good story can make a CRPG much more engaging and replayable. -
If it's anything like the Stronghold in NWN2, then you should have some recruitable NPCs to staff the place, plus guards you can levee and train from the local populace.
-
Many of them which are on this forum. All of them should be even, since they require an OE-account for the backer portal. As for 'objecting being a minority' actually amongst the ones who responded in reply to J.E. Sawyer the majority wasn't positive about the idea, very few came out positive for it. Now this might trigger a 'still minority of backers to vote negative' reply, but it remains of the backers replying the majority is against it. Would it be too far-fedged that this would be the same share of proportians amongst all backers? It very well could be... Statisticians are wary of such assumptions; for reliable results it's good to avoid personal biases and use independent checks. Those who are the most vocal tend to be those who have the most to gain by swaying the majority to a different opinion. That doesn't make them representative of the majority--just noisy. Personally I was in favor of the weapon wear option, so I remain unconvinced that the right outcome was achieved. But so be it.
-
Wasn't there an option to leave behind your extra companions to help defend the stronghold? Maybe the game will allow you to switch back and run those characters during the attack?
-
Wrong. The group that raised the money is the majority of the investors. You do not represent that group; you represent yourself. The number of posters raising objections to a specific topic in this thread are a minority. If the developers wanted to sample a majority of the investors, they would do random polling.
-
To prevent them from implenting ideas the general focusgroup of their game are strongly against? Like item degredation? This isn't a "general focusgroup"; it's a vocal minority. Strong opposition by a vocal minority that often has more extreme views than the wider group often isn't a reliable poll sample. But my comment was actually more about the general dickishness of some of the responses.
-
147? 31,294?
-
Not necessarily, as you'd still be operating within the confines of the defined "design-a-spell" system. Of course, it would be tricky and complex to design in a super interesting fashion. But, it's not as if it would be "just write down whatever you want to exist, in the entire world, and the game is going to create that spell for you! 8D!" It's very much like character builds; you only get to choose from a limited set of options, already, but the specific way in which you allocate points and choose aspects/components can lead to a variety of different results. Yes. As an example, the HERO/Champions system has considerable flexibility in terms of designing your own powers/spells. But it is the result of many years of careful balancing and tuning.
-
Okay then, a magical nut pops out of your arse. Inside is a message printed on a tiny scroll of rice paper...
-
-
Probably when you return to camp...
-
BALANCE shouldn't be a gold ticket to do really stupid and illogical things. Well, anonymity shouldn't be a golden ticket to say really stupid and illogical things either. But it does nonetheless. Magic is illogical and I think the mechanic is a reasonable approach to consider. I think people are tending to oppose it because it lacks a certain verisimilitude, and it perhaps seems a little too munchkin-like.
-
-
A spell to solely protect against friendly fire by the caster could be useful; cast it on your allies then detonate a fireball wherever you want. (The spell could briefly blink the party away the moment fireball spell goes off.) Having your opponents use it against the party would be a nasty surprise.
-
The French are revolting... Delayed Ryanair passengers loot drinks trolley and steal cigarettes in 'barbaric' revolt
-
The difference is the off-hand defensive weapon would give a deflection bonus against melee attacks but not against missile fire. Not sure how well that would play out in terms of implementation coding.
-
-
Well put. I think that general notion can apply to a number of fine-grained details being suggested in this forum...
-
-
There are two types of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from limited data
-
Sister Sarah's Surly Sauce and Magic Mushroom Mudpacks. It heals what's hurting and is quite trippy, but has the side effect of producing small vegetative growths on some parts the skin that are an absolute bugger to dig out. God-like creatures, beware.
-
From what I've read, the game will take the PC up to about level 12. I haven't heard whether we'll be able to improve attributes or not, but that's something I enjoy doing... as long as the improvement is slow and small. I definitely didn't like the Dragon Age/Dungeon Siege approach that leads to strongly asymmetrical characters.
-
Yeah, I hate Stanford. It's really the one university/team I have complete disdain for. Not quite sure why; it's an outstanding educational institution and I respect their sports teams. (I went to the UW.)
-
-
Left-click to travel; right-click to codex...
