Jump to content

Welcome to Obsidian Forum Community
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Photo

Please no more Barbarian with Int


  • Please log in to reply
47 replies to this topic

#1
Benefit

Benefit

    (0) Nub

  • Initiates
  • 2 posts

I just wanted to get into another playtrough of PoE 1 and it remembered me of one thing that
made me throw up in my mouth the first time I saw it... Intelligence as a required stat for Barbarians... please don't... just don't...
I know Barbarians don't have to be stupid without the ability to speak normally but... just no!
I would understand it for a fighter or an ranger but not a barbarian... please no... every time I see it it feels like
someone scratching with nails on a chalkboard so please for gods sake no...!

http://gph.is/1maiw0M


  • Androoh likes this

#2
Juodas Varnas

Juodas Varnas

    (2) Evoker

  • Members
  • 83 posts

Edited by Juodas Varnas, 21 October 2017 - 04:18 AM.

  • PugPug, Messier-31, Goddard and 5 others like this

#3
Katarack21

Katarack21

    Chief Eldritch Abomination of the Obsidian Order

  • Members
  • 2353 posts
  • Steam:Katarack21
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer
  • Black Isle Bastard!

I have no problem with it. The "dumb barbarian" archetype is ridiculous and needs changing, not to mention the fact that I enjoy all the attributes being important to all the classes as it creates real trade off's instead of just dumping points.


  • kierun, Varana and illathid like this

#4
Sedrefilos

Sedrefilos

    (10) Necromancer

  • Members
  • 1525 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer

I just wanted to get into another playtrough of PoE 1 and it remembered me of one thing that
made me throw up in my mouth the first time I saw it... Intelligence as a required stat for Barbarians... please don't... just don't...
I know Barbarians don't have to be stupid without the ability to speak normally but... just no!
I would understand it for a fighter or an ranger but not a barbarian... please no... every time I see it it feels like
someone scratching with nails on a chalkboard so please for gods sake no...!

http://gph.is/1maiw0M

It is not a required stat. You can boost int to have a larger carnage aoe. That's it. But why can't a barbarian be intelligent anyway?


  • Karkarov, morhilane, kierun and 5 others like this

#5
Katarack21

Katarack21

    Chief Eldritch Abomination of the Obsidian Order

  • Members
  • 2353 posts
  • Steam:Katarack21
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer
  • Black Isle Bastard!

I don't even understand where the "stupid barbarian" originated. Conan the Barbarian spoke (and read, and wrote) like, a dozen languages and often translated ancient runes etc as well as being a master tactician in the Howard books.


Edited by Katarack21, 21 October 2017 - 05:30 AM.

  • teknoman2, kierun, CottonWolf and 1 other like this

#6
MaxQuest

MaxQuest

    (10) Necromancer

  • Members
  • 1476 posts
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer
Random thought... what if INT attribute would mean Intensity?
- increases the duration of CC spells
- reduces the duration of DoT spells that deal fixed damage, making the same amount being applied faster; while DoT's with no fixed damage just linger for longer and thus deal more damage
- a more intense storm usually covers a wider area, so there: increased AoE
- if a beneficial spell was casted with higher intensity - it's effect will linger for longer - hence +% duration.

So a barbarian with high INT would just mean that he makes a more intense use of his ability to slash several enemies in one swing.

On a similar note DEX could be renamed to Quickness - as this is what it actually does.
And PER to Finesse - as being more exact allows you to easier hitting the vital spot. Additionally goes well with fast weapons needing to crit more often then slow harder-hitting ones, in order to overcome DR. And there is no problem with Quickness and Finesse influencing Reflex either.

Edited by MaxQuest, 21 October 2017 - 06:02 AM.

  • Dr <3 and HooAmEye like this

#7
algroth

algroth

    (5) Thaumaturgist

  • Members
  • 582 posts
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer
  • Black Isle Bastard!

I don't even understand where the "stupid barbarian" originated. Conan the Barbarian spoke (and read, and wrote) like, a dozen languages and often translated ancient runes etc as well as being a master tactician in the Howard books.

Well, the term barbarian implies the human being in question is uncivilized or primitive, and was how the Greeks designated people of non-Greek culture (who they largely saw as inferior, culturally at least). It doesn't necessarily mean barbarians are stupid but it sort of came to existence as a derogatory term that implied them being all of this.


  • Karkarov, dragubaba and Wormerine like this

#8
Dr <3

Dr <3

    (6) Magician

  • Members
  • 781 posts
  • Deadfire Silver Backer
  • Fig Backer

Random thought... what if INT attribute would mean Intensity?
- increases the duration of CC spells
- reduces the duration of DoT spells that deal fixed damage, making the same amount being applied faster; while DoT's with no fixed damage just linger for longer and thus deal more damage
- a more intense storm usually covers a wider area, so there: increased AoE
- if a beneficial spell was casted with higher intensity - it's effect will linger for longer - hence +% duration.

So a barbarian with high INT would just mean that he makes a more intense use of his ability to slash several enemies in one swing.

On a similar note DEX could be renamed to Quickness - as this is what it actually does.
And PER to Finesse - as being more exact allows you to easier hitting the vital spot. Additionally goes well with fast weapons needing to crit more often then slow harder-hitting ones, in order to overcome DR. And there is no problem with Quickness and Finesse influencing Reflex either.


Basically i agree with you, i just think that in this way might and intesity can overlap concectually ( since might increase spell dmg too)
  • MaxQuest likes this

#9
Katarack21

Katarack21

    Chief Eldritch Abomination of the Obsidian Order

  • Members
  • 2353 posts
  • Steam:Katarack21
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer
  • Black Isle Bastard!

 

I don't even understand where the "stupid barbarian" originated. Conan the Barbarian spoke (and read, and wrote) like, a dozen languages and often translated ancient runes etc as well as being a master tactician in the Howard books.

Well, the term barbarian implies the human being in question is uncivilized or primitive, and was how the Greeks designated people of non-Greek culture (who they largely saw as inferior, culturally at least). It doesn't necessarily mean barbarians are stupid but it sort of came to existence as a derogatory term that implied them being all of this.

 

Yes, but Conan is the archetype fantasy barbarian--sword&sorcery, all that. What I'm curious about is why the fantasy barbarians that came after Conan are all a bunch of thick-headed idiots when Conan demonstrably was not.


  • kierun, illathid, Lephys and 2 others like this

#10
Gromnir

Gromnir

    Arch-Mage

  • Members
  • 7134 posts
  • Location:Sleeping in my office.
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Silver Backer
  • Fig Backer
  • Black Isle Bastard!

the problem ain't intelligent barbarians.  the problem is carnage. there weren't s'posed to be class defining abilities in poe.  nevertheless, carnage is indeed a class defining ability, and the best way to squeeze the most juice outta of carnage is to boost intelligence. the problem is barbarians being defined by carnage.

 

as an aside, am always annoyed when the developers (josh) use the "intelligent barbarian" as an example o' poe character creation flexibility.  in point o' fact, the intelligent barbarian is one o' the few examples o' a poe customization fails.  just as it were wasteful to purposeful build a weak ad&d fighter, it is foolish to build a stoopid poe barbarian.  developers deserve a smack in the face with a less than fresh trout every time they use the "intelligent barbarian" to promote the breadth o' poe character customization.

 

HA! Good Fun!


  • illathid, Lephys, Blades of Vanatar and 1 other like this

#11
HooAmEye

HooAmEye

    (3) Conjurer

  • Members
  • 179 posts
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer

It is the same situation with dwarves. The original pop culture touchstones are Tolkein and Wagner, both of who had their dwarves as these multilayered characters, with their individual cultures and spirituality. Nowadays though everyone expects dwarves to be these hard drinking lugs



#12
Wormerine

Wormerine

    (6) Magician

  • Members
  • 622 posts
  • Location:Poznan
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer

I don't even understand where the "stupid barbarian" originated. Conan the Barbarian spoke (and read, and wrote) like, a dozen languages and often translated ancient runes etc as well as being a master tactician in the Howard books.

Well, the term barbarian implies the human being in question is uncivilized or primitive, and was how the Greeks designated people of non-Greek culture (who they largely saw as inferior, culturally at least). It doesn't necessarily mean barbarians are stupid but it sort of came to existence as a derogatory term that implied them being all of this.

Yes, but Conan is the archetype fantasy barbarian--sword&sorcery, all that. What I'm curious about is why the fantasy barbarians that came after Conan are all a bunch of thick-headed idiots when Conan demonstrably was not.

Because of Schwarzenegger films. For most people it’s what they think when you mention the character.

#13
rjshae

rjshae

    Arch-Mage

  • Members
  • 4647 posts
  • Location:Seattle, WA
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer

A couple of points:

 

1) There are no required stats.

 

2) Ignorance does not make one stupid.

 

One can be a highly intelligent barbarian and still remain ignorant of civilized ways. I suppose to the naive that could make the barbarian appear stupid.


  • kierun, algroth and Wormerine like this

#14
Gromnir

Gromnir

    Arch-Mage

  • Members
  • 7134 posts
  • Location:Sleeping in my office.
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Silver Backer
  • Fig Backer
  • Black Isle Bastard!

...

 

need for repetition.

 

what a barbarian is, or should be, is 'posed to be defined by the player and not by tolkien or robert e. howard or the developers or anybody posting on this board.  a primary goal for character customization were flexibility.  the individual player, bounded only by their imagination, would define a given class.  play your barbarian smart or stoopid shouldn't matter. should be able to play your barbarian 'stead of josh's or Gromnir's or the genesis poster's barbarian. given the goals 'o poe, arguing 'bout what a barbarian is or can be is silliness. 

 

again, the problem is the class defining nature of carnage and not the viability o' an intelligent barbarian. 

 

HA! Good Fun!  



#15
PugPug

PugPug

    (4) Theurgist

  • Members
  • 253 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer

All you need to know about barbarians, you can learn from Fangbone.

 


  • Torm51 likes this

#16
injurai

injurai

    (8) Warlock

  • Members
  • 1188 posts
  • Location:Not the oceans
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer
  • Black Isle Bastard!

A couple of points:

 

1) There are no required stats.

 

2) Ignorance does not make one stupid.

 

One can be a highly intelligent barbarian and still remain ignorant of civilized ways. I suppose to the naive that could make the barbarian appear stupid.

 

You can also have stupid people who are socialized to be civilized automatons.



#17
Boeroer

Boeroer

    Arch-Mage

  • Members
  • 7386 posts
  • Location:Bucharest, Romania
  • Lords of the Eastern Reach Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer
  • Black Isle Bastard!

A barbarian with 1 INT can still hit adjacent foes with Carnage. They have to stand close ot each other, but it still works. Since it doesn't matter if the AoE of Carnage just barely scratches your circle or fully covers it, there is quite a bit of play when it comes to INT.

 

A barb with 10 INT will not hit a lot less enemies than one with 15 INT for example. There are some sweet spots though. Once you mange you scratch the second row of enemies with your Carnage AoE things get interesting. And that's why some people like to max out INT. But it's not that much of a gimpage to play a barb with mediocre INT.

 

Of course there's still Frenzy and Savage Defiance which get better the more INT you have... ;)


  • illathid likes this

#18
algroth

algroth

    (5) Thaumaturgist

  • Members
  • 582 posts
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer
  • Black Isle Bastard!

 

 

I don't even understand where the "stupid barbarian" originated. Conan the Barbarian spoke (and read, and wrote) like, a dozen languages and often translated ancient runes etc as well as being a master tactician in the Howard books.

Well, the term barbarian implies the human being in question is uncivilized or primitive, and was how the Greeks designated people of non-Greek culture (who they largely saw as inferior, culturally at least). It doesn't necessarily mean barbarians are stupid but it sort of came to existence as a derogatory term that implied them being all of this.

 

Yes, but Conan is the archetype fantasy barbarian--sword&sorcery, all that. What I'm curious about is why the fantasy barbarians that came after Conan are all a bunch of thick-headed idiots when Conan demonstrably was not.

 

If I were to venture a guess, I reckon it is because of an amalgamation of terms and uses. Also, for example, in Spanish "bárbaro" can still be used as a synonym to "brute", which also alludes to lack of education, primitiveness and so on. Doesn't help that the barbarian even in sword & sorcery is often designed from a visual perspective as a fairly primitive and brutish kind of warrior.


Edited by algroth, 21 October 2017 - 10:31 AM.


#19
MortyTheGobbo

MortyTheGobbo

    (4) Theurgist

  • Members
  • 312 posts

People get really offended over breaking genre conventions.


  • kierun, Varana, illathid and 6 others like this

#20
MaxQuest

MaxQuest

    (10) Necromancer

  • Members
  • 1476 posts
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer

Basically i agree with you, i just think that in this way might and intesity can overlap concectually ( since might increase spell dmg too)

I was thinking of might and intensity as of current and voltage (although imagining a flow of inner energy/mana/w/e rather than electrons).
But yeah, good point. Without caveats they indeed seem to overlap.

Edited by MaxQuest, 21 October 2017 - 11:50 AM.

  • Dr <3 and vanyel54 like this




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users