Some would suggest that it is good to care about the lives of black people, too. You may have heard slogans to that effect, recently.
Most of that doesn't really seem to actually be remotely relevant to what I was actually saying. I'll just highlight this one bit, though.
"But if malaria became mainstream in the US I can guarantee you the US media would highlight this"
Here's what I'm saying: not just the US media, but also the Australian media, the UK media, etc. As I believe you've already noted, monkeypox has been observed in Africa since the 70s. When the current monkeypox 'outbreak' occurred, it was already all over Nigeria. Then it got to the UK, and suddenly news sources in the USA and Australia (not just the UK) cared enough to report on it. If Australian and US media don't care about diseases that are all over Africa, they don't really have much additional incentive to care about diseases that have hopped the ditch over to Europe. Except, of course, that the UK is a wealthier country, with white, English speaking people in it. Maybe it wouldn't hurt our media to also care when it's Africa being ravaged by disease.
"So in summary the suggestion that monkeypox is a racist name is uninformed and ignores the history of this disease and how its spreading throughout the world"
Cool. I wasn't talking about that, though.