Jump to content

rjshae

Members
  • Posts

    5202
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    84

Everything posted by rjshae

  1. Yeah, how could such a stunty creature with big furry ears ever possibly have such a nasty reputation?
  2. I'm guessing that the "Greed" thing was a simplification. Many of the dieties in polytheistic cultures had what we would consider character flaws, in addition to their divine aspects. Zeus was kind of a jackass. Dionysius was a drunk. Hera was often jealous to the point of murder. If, say, P:E includes a god of trade and commerce, it wouldn't be much of a stretch for the P:E equivalent of dirty, stinkin' hippies (read: druids) to deride that diety as a "god of greed." Perhaps the rough equivalent of Hermes then?
  3. They wouldn't necessarily need to implement multiclassing if they introduced something like a "sabbatical" level. Basically you're taking a break from your normal class progression in order to attain basic proficiency in something else (like spellcasting, combat specialization, thievery, and so forth). Thenceforth, you improve in that proficiency at a reduced rate while progressing in your normal class.
  4. I like the general concept, but think that the sight should be picked up from vision traces drawn from other living creatures. If everybody else is blind, then the cipher should probably be blind as well. (That might be a difficult mechanic to code though.)
  5. There are two essential basic strategies for succeeding at life: Never reveal all you know.
  6. In some countries of the world, unfortunately not so historically. We probably don't want to go there: discussions of modern religions get heated very quickly.
  7. For me, one of the big sources of inventory clutter are the crafting components. I sure hope those go in a separate category.
  8. The rule I learned is: let people play what they want. Don't force a particular alignment on them, or class, race, ... whatever. They're more likely to stick around that way, and to enjoy the experience.
  9. The Jaquarg is a flying creature with insect-like characteristics and behaviors. It begins its life cycle in a larval stage before metamorphosing into a flying scout. The Jaquarq is equipped with a ranged chemical attack that causes intense lethargy. During its larval stage, the Jaquarg is protected and raised by the hive creatures known as the Quarin. The latter are nearly blind, but have a heightened sense of smell that allows them to rapidly home in on the chemical tracers sprayed by the Jaquarg. Thus the two creatures form a symbiotic pair that cooperate on the hunt, with the Jaquarg attacking from range to slow down the prey, while the Quarin rapidly close in and swarm the victims. Once a prey is down, both share in the feast.
  10. Large, spider-like creatures called 'Viders' that use an endoskeleton structure in combination with a chitinous external carapice for protection. Basically a restructuring of the armadillo/tortoise with a segmented outer shell and a leathery hide to protect the exposed fleshy portions. Viders create web-like traps that are reinforced with a framework of twigs, branches, or overhanging arches. Like an armadillo, Viders can curl up into an armored ball for protection against larger creatures. They also possess a toxic bite that can paralyze a captured victim and begin to break down the flesh for consumption. Parallel evolution in action.
  11. Personally, I like the approach that religions reflect the worldviews and the lives of societies/individuals just like in our world. However, what's with the god of greed in this update and the early mention of gods scheming? For example, people who worship a god of wealth can earn a reputation of being greedy from other people. However, if a certain people worship "god of greed", then, how can they earn social trust in the first place? Simply, I cannot come up with even a possible example. Something that strikes me as slightly irregular about RPG implementations of pantheons is the concept of people only praying to a specific god. CRPGs like NWN2 have you pick a particular god to worship, as if that is your only choice. Yet in ancient societies with multiple gods, the people would often pray to many deities. A city like Athens would have a tutelary deity, but there would be other temples to other gods worshiped on particular days of the year. Wouldn't it make more sense to be able to choose multiple deities that you favor? Say your top 3?
  12. Here's an interesting news tidbit about the latest director of the proposed Warcraft movie: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/warcraft-movie-lands-source-code-416956
  13. Perhaps, but you shouldn't have it all your own way. It would be more realistic if your efforts to corrupt one party member had significant ramifications for the remainder. Turning a paladin to a life of debauchery should cause another upright NPC to view your behavior as utterly vile and thenceforth oppose your intentions. He or she may well leave your party and ally with those seeking your defeat.
  14. Yeah and i sure that you will se this in infinity enginge game with tactical view True. But to me it would be mildly interesting from a lore perspective. Plus maybe some day they'll go so far as to have a game release with cut-scenes.
  15. A thats change everything but still i think that in asian sociacieties, where some king of tournaments or arenas (but noy in coloseum) Okay, so, in the case of gladiatorial arenas, was it purely militaristic societies that have acquired slaves through conquest? Or have there been other motivations? You cite the example of the knightly tournaments during the middle ages, but my understanding was that such events were limited to the nobility; peasants simply couldn't afford the accoutrements. Plus the Christian ethos probably wouldn't have allowed the beastly spectacle of gladiators slaughtering each other.
  16. I should have clarified that I meant ancient civilizations. My apologies. As for what I'm opposed to: it's usually regarding excessive features that would likely require a lot of development effort without adding much, if anything, to the experience. I've been pretty consistent about that. In this case though I was merely making conversation. You seem to have an issue with me though, so perhaps we can take this off line.
  17. It would be interesting if Orlan ears had the mobility and expressiveness of a horse's. That would give them another racial distinctiveness, and perhaps even be a partial cause of their persecution by humans.
  18. Was there any human civilization besides the Romans that had gladiatorial arenas? The only similar example that springs to mind was that mesoamerican ball game with the stone rings. It may be appropriate to consider the cultural context before adding arenas.
  19. Historically, there was also an element of social and legal conformity associated with worship of the gods. Even to the point of being put to death for the crime of blasphemy or apostasy.
  20. Then why add it at all in a game based on a tabletop where creative roleplaying, regardless of alignment, can yield rewards. This seems like a copout idea of their intentions, or, if accurate, a copout on their part. Yes, awarding XP for "good" or "evil" behavior is an odd thing in itself. Unless the decision resulted from a skill check by the character, experience comes from dealing with the consequences of the decision, rather than from the decision itself. But then I suppose it could be viewed as an abstraction of sorts -- payment in advance for the consequences of your choice.
  21. For me this is low priority. PE doesn't enjoy the budget of a DA:O. Background feats are okay, but a limited set of deep background stories seems of little benefit.
  22. Having deity-specific feats that can only be acquired as a divine act (and taken away as an act of divine retribution) may be a nice way of signifying the favor of a god. For example, a person in the particular favor of Woedica may gain a feat of Inspired leadership that allows the character to rally the party from a fear effect, once per day.
  23. Being mildly artsy, I like to notice where the lights and shadows are placed. In this case, the Orlan appears to be back-lit by a cooler-hued light source that is most probably a moon. (Candles are a little warmer, me thinks--like the light in the window.) Certainly the reflection on the puddle at lower left is oddly placed, since it intersects the building, but perhaps that's an optical effect from water ripples. At least we know the setting most likely has at least one moon, plus stars of course. I guess the window ledge to the upper right, along with the bricks, are meant to give a sense of scale. Can anybody make out the wording on the sign near the top? It appears to be a hobby-horse. I'm not sure what to make of that.
  24. Speaking of 4e, it'll be interesting to see how the Pathfinder MMORPG Kickstarter works out. At first I was expecting a port of Pathfinder, but their description reads otherwise.
×
×
  • Create New...