Obsession I am Abeloth, Beloved Queen of the Stars, and Bringer of Chaos. Or not. Nikki's eyes sure do look like tiny stars, but there's a distinct lack of tentacly appendages. Introish ThingsThrice I've begun this post, and thrice I did not finish. So, perhaps somewhat uncharacteristically, the fourth time shall be the charm. As the headline suggests, I watched Obsession, and unlike @Sarex , I did not find it to be a waste of time. It was, however, extremely uncomfortable to watch. Which is partially by design, and partially a bit more, well, meta than I would like. More on that later though, assuming I manage to finish the post this time. Huh. Funny, one would think that a wall of text wouldn't be that much of an issue, coming from me, but apparently the fun does end at some point. Filmish things that should be longerAnyway, back to the film. If you, dear reader, will recall, I have complained about films consisting of mostly static shots in the past. Obsession has a lot of static shots too, but they're used in conjunction with set and scene design to a point where they make everything exceptionally uncomfortable to sit through. Perfect, one would argue, for a horror movie not overly reliant on jump scares. There are some, mind, but one generally sees them coming from two and a half miles away, so they may or may not work. Inde Navarrette's perfect performance rounds everything out. But, here's the thing, the film itself is not all that worth talking about. I mean I could, you know, argue that the scenes are set in a great way, that it, at times, way too deliberately invokes The Exorcist while at the same time clearly not being intended as demonic possession (although, sadly, some of Nikki's dialogue suggests as much). There's also the slow movements and the creepy movements and the creepily quick movements from Nikki that are generally possession tropes. They add to the general tension of the film, but there are too many of them, and they become distracting. One could also argue - relatively successfully - that the ending of the film is its biggest weakness, something it shares with Heretic (which I also enjoyed a lot). No, the actual thing to talk about here is the meta commentary on the film. At least, well, in my opinion. Which is a shame, because it's a nice, well made low budgety film that became a runaway smash hit for a good reason. Meta commentary gone wrongSo what is this now? Is it a feminist horror film for gender flipping the domestic abuser trope? Is the wishing willow that drives Nikki crazy and obsessive, a metaphor for date rape drugs? Does the film gender flip the classic slasher horror villain? Is the film actually misogynist and invoking the clingy girlfriend trope, just overdone to the point of it becoming satire? Should we laugh at it? I wouldn't be me if my answer here would not be: none of the above. First and foremost, for Nikki to become a wish-induced, gender-reversed slasher villain, she'd actually have to start killing people way, way earlier than the very end of the film. Arguably - minor spoiler ahead - three-quarters of the film's main cast die by the end, but in reality, it is a film with mostly four actors and a couple of extras strewn about, and the deaths are clustered around the culmination of Nikki's descent into insanity. Reading her as a revenge monster, so basically a wish-induced Bride from Kill Bill, is also a little, say, well, insane. Arguably, anything she does while under the influence of the wish is not consensual, and that would count as rape, but then her "revenge" by becoming an insane domestic abuser is not intentional either (and as such, invalid as an, uhm, intentionally made point). Classic case of having a cake and partaking in it, or however that idiom goes. Cakes, generally, are lies. Yep. Secondly, the idea that the film can be seen as having an overexaggerated clingy girlfriend can be dismissed simply by none of this being the actual choice of Nikki. Even with only the scant information of how the wish actually works that we have available - dialogue stronly suggests that Nikki's actual personality is replaced by what Bear, the film's "protagonist" wished for, but such a reading is categorically denied by the director, for whatever reason - we can just dismiss the idea out of hand. That leaves the final idea - that Bear is, for some reason, not just an insecure guy with a friend he has stronger feelings for, but a feckless and entitled male whose only thought revolves around controlling Nikki's desires, because that is what men do. The wish, viewed from such a point, really does become a date rape drug metaphor. Post-wish Nikki certainly is coded as domestic abuser, she exhibits all the telltale behavioral traits and certainly acts as such. That is the entire point of the film. Reading this as a smart, feminist role-reversal requires two things: mental gymnastics, and a very distinct lack of empathy for Bear's initial position, especially since the film - from the very start, mind - suggests that he's being manipulated by both his best friend and Nikki (who, is, also, for whatever reason, implied to be somewhat bipolar - Freaky Nikki, and all that), and possibly even Sarah (who is in Bear's friendzone, but no one ever talks about that, figures). He's insecure, sure, he's probably a couple of YouTube videos away from becoming an incel and a few more away from red pilling himself, but he exhibits none of the traits when casting his wish. It can also be examined by flipping genders for a moment. If we, say, were to cast Bear as girl who is in the friendzone of a guy she's friends with, and then casts a wish for him to love her more than anything, we'd watch what? So answer this riddle, and we can continue with the examination. Well? Well. Well, indeed. Reverse the genders, and we could make a romantic comedy out of the film. Bear-Girl's best friend could even comment on how romantic it is that Nikki-Boy would be this into her. At least until Nikki-Boy becomes an actual case of domestic abuse, and Bear-Girl can fall into the trap of thinking that if she just loves Nikki-Boy enough, she can totally change him. Yeah, doesn't really work now, does it? It's the nice thing about art, I guess, one can draw conclusions and walk away from the film being secure in their knowledge that the film's a satirical take on the clingy psycho girlfriend, but that requires a certain mindset when watching the film, or you can walk away from it and see it as a smart, feminist horror film. Bear’s wish is clearly coercive in effect without necessarily being coercive in conscious intent. In fact, him casting his wish is not even a controlled, thought out action. It is a spur of the moment way to deal with his own frustration of being unable to answer Nikki's question that she posed to him: "Do you want to tell me something else?" Both takes say more about the world view of the person making this observation than what's actually in the film. Which lands us right back with Hamlet, except, well, looking into art's mirror, the commentators don't see an exaggerated reflection of their own view - but a fundamental truth. Either women are clingy, or men are trying to control women's desires. #surefinewhatever. I mean, hey, there's some meta fun here to be had, as the film very clearly draws out and reflects the rift in between our currently hyper-polarized culture war front lines. Oh, how clever the film really is, allowing for both readings in such a fashion, and I'm the only one high enough on my own farts to see it. Clearly, I should be paid to review art. Alas, I actually have to work for a living. :p More meta?Eh, that leaves the one thing that I said I'd come back to. Which is my personal meta part. Bear is extremely uncomfortable to watch. Partially by design, naturally, but also because it's like watching a much younger version of myself. Which is most of the reason these posts died before finishing them. It's kind of weird to be seen as someone whose desire is a very typical male wish to dominate women. Because I really don't remember that part of my past self. I, for one, just wanted to be accepted the way I was. Well, I also never had the ability to wish for something, so there's that. Who knows.