Jump to content

Cinematics : your opinion ?


Cinematics : your opinion ?  

82 members have voted

  1. 1. Are you expecting cinematics ?

    • Yes, 3D cinematics are good for a better immersion.
      11
    • Yes, but 2D animations are better for a RPG like this one.
      36
    • No.
      23
    • No for sure, i'll skip them everytime...
      2
    • No opinion.
      10


Recommended Posts

I know this is not an important issue, but personally I like it when the main plot of an RPG has some cutscenes or cinematics that come describe the progress of the story.

 

And you, what do you think about ?

Edited by BillyCorgan

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ I ' M ★  ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ B L A C K S T A R   ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My opinion on cinematics: They don't add anything to the game for me. I wouldn't miss them if they were cut.

Edited by KaineParker

"Akiva Goldsman and Alex Kurtzman run the 21st century version of MK ULTRA." - majestic

"you're a damned filthy lying robot and you deserve to die and burn in hell." - Bartimaeus

"Without individual thinking you can't notice the plot holes." - InsaneCommander

"Just feed off the suffering of gamers." - Malcador

"You are calling my taste crap." -Hurlshort

"thankfully it seems like the creators like Hungary less this time around." - Sarex

"Don't forget the wakame, dumbass" -Keyrock

"Are you trolling or just being inadvertently nonsensical?' -Pidesco

"we have already been forced to admit you are at least human" - uuuhhii

"I refuse to buy from non-woke businesses" - HoonDing

"feral camels are now considered a pest" - Gorth

"Melkathi is known to be an overly critical grumpy person" - Melkathi

"Oddly enough Sanderson was a lot more direct despite being a Mormon" - Zoraptor

"I found it greatly disturbing to scroll through my cartoon's halfing selection of genitalias." - Wormerine

"I love cheese despite the pain and carnage." - ShadySands

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to see some, but just as a kind of bookends to chapters, not popping up randomly during game play.

 

About the style, maybe slightly animated 2d pictures and some text/narration next to them? I think that shouldn't be as expensive as having Blur animations in the game and it would perhaps fit more with what we've seen to date (this and similar). Also +nostalgia.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As few as possible.  Zero preferably.  I'm not against cinematics in general, they can add to a game, the problem is that they cost money and resources.  Project Eternity may be one of the most successful Kickstarter campaigns ever, but it's still got a very limited budget in the grand scheme of things.  The money and resources that would potentially be spent on cinematics would be much better spent elsewhere.  Give me pictures and text, I'll be happy. 

  • Like 8

sky_twister_suzu.gif.bca4b31c6a14735a9a4b5a279a428774.gif
🇺🇸RFK Jr 2024🇺🇸

"Any organization created out of fear must create fear to survive." - Bill Hicks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obsidian will be using something better than cinematics - Scripted interactions. I'm very stoked about these.

 

http://media.obsidian.net/eternity/media/updates/0054/pe-scriptedevent-wip.1280.jpg

Edited by Leferd
  • Like 8

"Things are funny...are comedic, because they mix the real with the absurd." - Buzz Aldrin.

"P-O-T-A-T-O-E" - Dan Quayle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Panning over a still image with a chocolatey-voiced narrator will be just dandy for me.
If they really want to splurge they can add some animation to the pictures like fluttering capes etc.

  • Like 2

When in doubt, blame the elves.

 

I have always hated the word "censorship", I prefer seeing it as just removing content that isn't suitable or is considered offensive

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wouldn't mind animated cutscenes, if they were done well enough.

I'm mostly expecting some IWD style splash screens with voiceover and well satisfied with those.

 

Voted for 2d animations, because it's the closest option, not expecting to see such.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The King of Dragon Pass/Darklands text and illustration method is far more gripping for me, without the massive random success factor of course.

  • Like 1

Quite an experience to live in misery isn't it? That's what it is to be married with children.

I've seen things you people can't even imagine. Pearly Kings glittering on the Elephant and Castle, Morris Men dancing 'til the last light of midsummer. I watched Druid fires burning in the ruins of Stonehenge, and Yorkshiremen gurning for prizes. All these things will be lost in time, like alopecia on a skinhead. Time for tiffin.

 

Tea for the teapot!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you must remove my control of my character while Story happens, it doesn't really make much too difference to me whether it's a pre-rendered cuscene or animations in the isometric view. I guess the latter is still somewhat preferable, but the former can obviously look "nicer".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have real trouble thinking of any game where cinematics contributed in any significant way to my experience.

 

Wait. There is one. Knights of the Old Republic. The cinematic where Darth Revan removes her mask. That did do something. So it's not completely inconceivable that they might help.

 

But that's about it really.

 

In PE specifically, I think cinematics would be a complete and utter waste of resources. I trust they won't be doing that to us. I really like the look of those ink drawing-like intertitle panels. Tell the story with those. It worked for IWD, it'll work better for PE.

I have a project. It's a tabletop RPG. It's free. It's a work in progress. Find it here: www.brikoleur.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends 110% on the quality of the cinematic and how it is used.  Many people today, at least on this forum, seem confused though.  A scene where the camera angle changes and things play out in a scripted sequence (like Revan removing HIS mask) are not "cinematics".  It is simply a camera angle shift and a series of set animations playing out all in the same "field" that you play the normal game in all in engine.  The only resource they are taking is the time invested in programming the scene, all of that can be done in Unity easily. 

 

A Cinematic is a canned movie that happens outside of the normal play field and typically contains scenes or events that do not happen in engine and are rendered completely separately by a totally different program than the engine running the game. 

 

To borrow from the Star Wars Revan theme....

 

Not A Cinematic: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDesWVLsagI

 

An Actual Cinematic: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QyYbvVAtlWk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Karkarov, whose definitions are those? 'Cuz the distinction seems pretty artificial to me, especially as in-game rendering gets closer and closer to film quality.

 

By that narrower definition, though, I guess that makes my list of games that benefit from cinematics an even zero.

I have a project. It's a tabletop RPG. It's free. It's a work in progress. Find it here: www.brikoleur.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Typically don't care about them. It's not that they can't be well done/neat-o, I just wouldn't miss them if they weren't there. They're also things that I believe should be left to act-ends or the endgame or something, eg not frequent (not every "boss" encounter, say) and doesn't interrupt general gameplay. Also, if they're in there and more than 3-6 seconds long, should be skippable via the ESC key or whatever. Always. :p

 

Anyway ... stuff like narration over a nice painting between Chapt/Acts or whatnot is fine/I'd sorta expect that. But as others have said, I hope Obsidian won't waste resources trying to make shiny cinematics for this one. Not necessary.

“Things are as they are. Looking out into the universe at night, we make no comparisons between right and wrong stars, nor between well and badly arranged constellations.” – Alan Watts
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as intro / cinematics go; I think Icewind Dale pretty much nailed it:

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=67FuWzixduc  (I hope posting this is ok)

 

Given the limited budget, I would rather Obsidian spend the money on a really great narrator, and keep the cut scenes and cinematics on par with the scripted events.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Karkarov, whose definitions are those? 'Cuz the distinction seems pretty artificial to me, especially as in-game rendering gets closer and closer to film quality.

 

By that narrower definition, though, I guess that makes my list of games that benefit from cinematics an even zero.

Uh those are THE definitions.  If it happens fully in game, in real time, in engine, it is not a cutscene or a cinematic it is a simply a scripted event.  I hope you aren't suggesting they not run scripted events because Baldur's Gate and Icewind Dale etc used them out the yin yang.  The only difference between the "not a cinematic" link I posted above and say ....  meeting Sarevok in the woods the first time and watching Gorion die is that in the Sarevok scene the camera angle stays the same. 

 

"In game renderings" as you said are just the games graphics, those graphics are being loaded when you play the game... they don't change for a scripted event.  The sith inquisitor in the video I linked doesn't suddenly get rendered in higher quality because a scripted event is happening, that is just what that character looks like in the game.  I know no one expects this to be a graphics whore game, but the in game models had better look on par with things like Drakensang at least.  I don't think that is asking too much considering the original Drakensang came out 5 years ago and had a budget likely in the same ball park as PE. At least most reviewers called Drakensang a "low budget game", so if it had more funding I doubt it was by much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see cinematics more as an introduction/conclusion to a scenario. A mix of 2d and 3d are fine, shifting from the simple events (sword fights, etc.) in rendered in the 3d game engine to the more complex events featuring a sequence of still images, ambient noise, sound effects and narrative text. I'll be happy if they are skippable; we will be playing the game a long time, getting trapped watching various events can be tedious. For example the Baldurs Gate 2 intro and chapter scenes became quite tedious because they were inescapable, the same with scenes in many games where you have to reload. Skipping as an option seems the user-friendly alternative for replays (Not short, next event skips but whole cinematic skips back to player control). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

KotOR, KotOR2 and Jade Empire are all borderline between in game cutscenes and cinematics.

Most/many (if not all) of the cutscenes were actually video files despite being (mostly) made with the game engine.

 

They were just rendered at higher quality settings than what Xbox or low end PC:s were capable of.

The files were limited to 640x480 (or thereabouts) resolution, so with current PC's look worse than the rest of the game.

 

The cinematics I consider utter waste of time, are just the kind we see of Old Republic or the Minotaur fight at the opening of NWN.

(NWN2 opening battle at least ties with the game and makes sense in a "oh, that's what happened there" way).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Karkarov, sorry, but I'm still not buying.

From where I'm at, a cinematic is a pre-created sequence that uses cinematic techniques to convey a message. Whether it's pre-rendered or rendered in-engine is fairly irrelevant.

 

This Revan scene, for example, uses a ton of these techniques. Intercutting, panning, zooming, rotating camera, so on and so forth. It happens out of flow of events: it's a flashback, not something that's happening to you in sequence as you play the game. It is most definitely a cinematic sequence, and a pretty good one at that.

 

A scripted event, OTOH, happens in-flow. You're doing something, and then something scripted happens. The game may or may not freeze your controls and force you to watch it passively, or it may just start happening and you may or may not stop to watch.

So in BG, the bit where Sarevok whacked Gorion was a scripted event. The opening movie where he threw that poor knight over the balcony was a cinematic. Yes, indeed, in that case one was in-engine and one was not, but that's simply because the IE doesn't let you do cinematics in-engine, being 2D and sprite-based. The KOTOR engine, OTOH, being 3D, is perfectly capable of being used for cinematics, and while the game also featured (rather bad IMO) pre-rendered cinematics, it used in-engine ones as well.

So, again, Karkarov, where does your definition of "cinematic" that makes "pre-rendered" central to it come from? It doesn't make any sense to me. A feature should be defined by its function, not by the technique used to create it. A cinematic is a cinematic. If you have to, you can always make an additional distinction between pre-rendered cinematics and in-engine cinematics, of course.

 

Edit: Oh, look what I found

Edited by PrimeJunta
  • Like 1

I have a project. It's a tabletop RPG. It's free. It's a work in progress. Find it here: www.brikoleur.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

So, again, Karkarov, where does your definition of "cinematic" that makes "pre-rendered" central to it come from? 

 

To me, the big difference would be when cinematic takes account of how you've dressed up your character appearing in it,

whether you're male or female and what companions are along, for example. Pre-rendered is what it is, in-game stuff can be either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An opening cinematic, and an ending cinematic (hopefully in addition to a Fallout style - slide show ending). I think everything else can be covered with the scripted events.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm ambivalent about cutscenes. I'm not opposed to them, I love a good cinematic cutscene. I think Warcraft III has some of the best cutscenes ever made. Blizzard generally knows to do them well.

 

However, if a cutscene takes away control from the player when the player could play or act the scene out himself, it's probably taking away from the game experience.

Cutscenes should only be for narrative you could not otherwise deliver. A transition, perhaps an introduction, some exposition (though be wary of the exposition dump)

I also believe that cutscenes shouldn't involve anything which the player could reasonably influence. I shall call this the Phoenix down argument.

  • Like 3

Remember: Argue the point, not the person. Remain polite and constructive. Friendly forums have friendly debate. There's no shame in being wrong. If you don't have something to add, don't post for the sake of it. And don't be afraid to post thoughts you are uncertain about, that's what discussion is for.
---
Pet threads, everyone has them. I love imagining Gods, Monsters, Factions and Weapons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...