Jump to content

Welcome to Obsidian Forum Community
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Photo

Should Obsidian let beta testers play bigger chunks of the game before the launch of the next PoE game?


  • Please log in to reply
40 replies to this topic

Poll: Should Obsidian let beta testers play bigger chunks of the game before the launch of the next PoE game? (92 member(s) have cast votes)

Should Obsidian let beta testers play bigger chunks of the game before launch next time?

  1. Yes (48 votes [52.17%])

    Percentage of vote: 52.17%

  2. No (29 votes [31.52%])

    Percentage of vote: 31.52%

  3. Don't know (9 votes [9.78%])

    Percentage of vote: 9.78%

  4. I don't care (6 votes [6.52%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.52%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1
IndiraLightfoot

IndiraLightfoot

    Apex of the Obsidian Order

  • Members
  • 5321 posts
  • Location:Over the Hills and Far Away
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Silver Backer
  • Fig Backer
  • Black Isle Bastard!

I have been one of the lucky ones - with few bugs and then almost always minor ones - but still I do acknowledge that there are hundreds of bugs that the Obsidian test players missed, many of them simple to notice too (at least if you're a CRPG veteran, and if you don't know the game beforehand).

 

So, personally, I'd love to see Obsidian letting beta players test bigger chunks of the game sometime before launch in order to find many obvious and important bugs - then they have the time to iron them all out before launch.

 

What do you think?

 

I've added a poll. :)


Edited by IndiraLightfoot, 18 May 2018 - 06:00 AM.

  • gogocactus likes this

#2
Taurus

Taurus

    (2) Evoker

  • Members
  • 69 posts
  • Deadfire Gold Backer
  • Fig Backer
  • Black Isle Bastard!

IMO No.

But they should have some for the bugs, and others for the combat.

 

"Here, test these many encounters and see how they play out".



#3
DexGames

DexGames

    (5) Thaumaturgist

  • Members
  • 430 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Deadfire Silver Backer
  • Fig Backer

I thought about it too, maybe not as far as the entire content, but at least the whole package of mechanics.

No restrictions like lvl 9 where, practically speaking, you get to test 3 or 4 abilities.

 

Removing Level restrictions, would have allowed us to give feedbacks on :

  • Testing all Abilities & their Power.
  • Test the Level Scaling.
  • Test the High End Difficulty.
  • Overall Tuning Feedback before release.

Edited by DexGames, 18 May 2018 - 05:56 AM.

  • IndiraLightfoot, PIP-Clownboy, Taurus and 1 other like this

#4
E.RedMark

E.RedMark

    (6) Magician

  • Members
  • 654 posts

I say No..

 

I mean whole game , sheesh..imagine if one of them decide to spoil the whole thing . 

 

if they can use part of the game like @Taurus said , just combat without context or anything..maybe . 


  • IndiraLightfoot, Anouschnei and Taurus like this

#5
IndiraLightfoot

IndiraLightfoot

    Apex of the Obsidian Order

  • Members
  • 5321 posts
  • Location:Over the Hills and Far Away
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Silver Backer
  • Fig Backer
  • Black Isle Bastard!

@Dexgames & E.RedMark: Wow, you bring up stuff I didn't even consider - the problem of leaking the content and worse. Well, I should adapt my title and question a bit, I reckon.

Very good points! :)


  • DexGames and Taurus like this

#6
E.RedMark

E.RedMark

    (6) Magician

  • Members
  • 654 posts

and Beta tester , unless they keep testing for a year or 2....can't really catch everything everything .

 

When Xcom came out I remember , I was waiting hanging on Steam . Alot of peoples , with better pc then mine couldn't even make it launch . 

 

there are countless issue sure , but there are also countless computer and not everyone running the same setting and hardware . 

 

I mean , beta can catch some . But not everything . I had one playtrough and the game only crashed 3 times on me..and I'm pretty sure it was cose of my own pc going funky . And the bugs were mostly quest and dialogue and nothing that would stop me from playing. 



#7
Juodas Varnas

Juodas Varnas

    (6) Magician

  • Members
  • 686 posts
  • Location:Grand Duchy of Lithuania
  • Deadfire Backer

I'd rather they just hired some QA to test their games

11e8zh.jpg


  • tinysalamander, Yria, Porcelyn and 4 others like this

#8
Rhaeg

Rhaeg

    (3) Conjurer

  • Members
  • 121 posts
  • Location:The Hague, NL
  • Deadfire Silver Backer
  • Fig Backer

but still I do acknowledge that there are hundreds of bugs that the Obsidian test players missed, many of them simple to notice too 

 

Hundreds of bugs? I'd like to see a list with those!



#9
freche

freche

    (2) Evoker

  • Members
  • 52 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer

Things and issues will always come up after release. The amount of beta testers and those that actually report things can't possibly test all variables and different crazy stuff that 100 000 players will do.

 

And personally I'm not really that bothered with difficulty imbalance in a single player game, although in Deadfires case it could probably have been done a bit better even at release. I'd rather have not all information and theory min-maxed classes before the game is released.



#10
Aramintai

Aramintai

    (10) Necromancer

  • Members
  • 1424 posts
  • Location:Riga, Latvia
  • Steam:Aramintai
  • PSN Portable ID:Aramintai
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Silver Backer
  • Fig Backer
  • Black Isle Bastard!

I think they should let beta testers test all the mechanics of the game, not just non-spoilery ones. So many bugs related to save imports, companions, dispositions and relationship system could have been avoided at POE2 release if only they were introduced in the beta...


  • illathid, Yria and Juodas Varnas like this

#11
flamesium

flamesium

    (3) Conjurer

  • Members
  • 179 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer

I understand why they don't, and tbh it's hard to understand how they didn't notice that difficulty/level scaling and imports were so broken from their own testing.

 

I appreciate it will be difficult to test every possible import combination, but that doesn't seem to explain the Vela situation for instance (you either took her or you didn't) or that level scaling was -afaik- universally not working. It shouldn't take extensive public beta testing to catch these sorts of problems.



#12
Ryz009

Ryz009

    (4) Theurgist

  • Members
  • 344 posts
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer

Yes if only to see which bugs are deal breakers for players that they probably see as minor issues.



#13
wih

wih

    (3) Conjurer

  • Members
  • 164 posts
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer

Actually, what is the problem if beta testers can play through a part of the story or even the entire story? Someone will decide to spoil it? PoE 2 released more than a week ago and already there are many players who have finished it and can spoil the plot for the majority of players that aren't. So what? I am only at level 9 still and nobody has spoiled the game for me (because of course I am careful to avoid spoilers and also the forum is structured in such a way as to make avoiding spoilers possible).



#14
yoyolll

yoyolll

    (3) Conjurer

  • Members
  • 113 posts
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer

Volunteer (or paying) beta testers are no replacement for proper QA.  This game, and just about every Obsidian game ever, needed a lot more time with QA before release.



#15
illathid

illathid

    (6) Magician

  • Members
  • 726 posts
  • PSN Portable ID:illathid
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Silver Backer
  • Fig Backer
  • Black Isle Bastard!

Volunteer (or paying) beta testers are no replacement for proper QA.  This game, and just about every Obsidian game ever, needed a lot more time with QA before release.

 

While volunteers are no replacement for proper QA, there some bugs that are impossible to find in house (like the shader bug that some people had on macs).



#16
Urocyon

Urocyon

    (1) Prestidigitator

  • Members
  • 39 posts
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer
  • Black Isle Bastard!
Providing access to more of the abilities would have gone a long way to help balance and flesh out the classes. They wouldn't even necessarily have to spoil any content. It could have just been a series of encounters for which you could run some builds through to see how powers interact. This testing area could have even been kept for release and accessed through the start menu so that folks trying to figure out what they want to play could fire it up, make a character of a specific level, and beat on an encounter in a neutral environment without having to do the Berathian walk of shame a dozen times.

I also think narrowing focus of the project scope so more time could be spent on fine tuning things like encounters, quest depth, and item diversity would have helped alleviate some of the complaints I have seen.

For example, sidekicks are neat and all but maybe the effort to make them could have been used to provide more substantial companion quests or a larger variety of soulbound items.

#17
mazeltov

mazeltov

    (4) Theurgist

  • Members
  • 341 posts

>Bugsidian

>testing

 

Pick one. No but seriously, now they can make a major balance overhaul another selling point for the forthcoming DLC. Twofer!  :sorcerer:



#18
Townsendvol

Townsendvol

    (2) Evoker

  • Members
  • 90 posts
  • Location:U.S.A
  • Deadfire Gold Backer
  • Fig Backer

I had early access but didn't use it much because I wanted to go into the game pretty fresh.  However I do believe that the earlier that companies give some players access the better, that why its better tested on many different set ups.  Ofcourse I mean players that have the games best interest at heart.

 

I sometimes feel a bit bad that I didn't play the beta more to try and help find bugs but that wasn't the reason I backed at the level I did. 



#19
yoyolll

yoyolll

    (3) Conjurer

  • Members
  • 113 posts
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer

I sometimes feel a bit bad that I didn't play the beta more to try and help find bugs but that wasn't the reason I backed at the level I did. 

Generally, people will get paid to do this, so don't feel too bad.


  • Ryz009 likes this

#20
PIP-Clownboy

PIP-Clownboy

    Anathematized Apostate of the Obsidian Order

  • Members
  • 391 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer

You can't properly beta test when the build is consistently 3 months behind the dev. 

 

Not to mention, and I called this, people were crying because their half-naked party was wiping to the Titan in beta. People were posting how it was 'impossible' (when it wasn't). It's no real surprise that POTD at release turned into an outright Attack Move simulator. 






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users