Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Future of the Dragon Age franchise
#1
Posted 19 March 2012 - 09:40 PM
We talked about this on a separate thread already, but I decided to make a new one so those interested wouldn't miss the info.
The news is: the executive producer for the DA franchise posted on the BIO forums, talking about the future of the franchise. Most importantly, the following things are confirmed:
a) No more DLCs or expansions for DA2. Possibly patches.
b) They are working on a new DA game.
If you have an account there, definitely check the developer posts: http://social.biowar...x/10245444&lf=8
#2
Posted 19 March 2012 - 10:04 PM
We will try to bring some closure to Hawke's story but likely not in a playable form. Originally we had planned to do an expansion pack but had to stop to focus on what we are working on now.
In other words, EA figured the time and money spent on making an expansion is better used churning out the next full installment in record time.
#3
Posted 19 March 2012 - 10:27 PM
We will try to bring some closure to Hawke's story but likely not in a playable form. Originally we had planned to do an expansion pack but had to stop to focus on what we are working on now.
In other words, EA figured the time and money spent on making an expansion is better used churning out the next full installment in record time.
Record time would indicate that it's going to be released in the next month or so.
#4
Posted 19 March 2012 - 10:33 PM
With day 0 DLC
We will try to bring some closure to Hawke's story but likely not in a playable form. Originally we had planned to do an expansion pack but had to stop to focus on what we are working on now.
In other words, EA figured the time and money spent on making an expansion is better used churning out the next full installment in record time.
Record time would indicate that it's going to be released in the next month or so.
Maybe they realised that data mining couldn't give them all the answers?
#5
Posted 19 March 2012 - 11:18 PM
The old god child will give Hawke/warden three choices at the end.
1. All Qunari & Mages die
2. Blood control of all Mages
3. Synthesis
#6
Posted 20 March 2012 - 12:03 AM
3. Synthesis
I think that would be Enhancement! in DA.
And of course the player has to somehow choose the color of the ending by Awesome button, since every action in the game is mapped behind it.
#7
Posted 20 March 2012 - 12:10 AM
Because I'd rather not see that uninspired setting again.
#8
Posted 20 March 2012 - 12:21 AM
We will try to bring some closure to Hawke's story but likely not in a playable form. Originally we had planned to do an expansion pack but had to stop to focus on what we are working on now.
In other words, EA figured the time and money spent on making an expansion is better used churning out the next full installment in record time.
Or reading between the lines, time and money is better spent on doubling the price of the expansion, removing the requirement of owning DA2, removing the part of the title after the colon, and appending the number '3' to it.
#9
Posted 20 March 2012 - 12:28 AM
I guess this is just this week's "let's bash BIO" thread.
Now, where are my antihistamines?
Edited by 213374U, 20 March 2012 - 12:30 AM.
#10
Posted 20 March 2012 - 12:41 AM
Haven't played ME3, but I can't believe it's that bad.
That would be like a midwife that had never given birth. It can't hurt as much as they say, right?
#11
Posted 20 March 2012 - 12:52 AM
#12
Posted 20 March 2012 - 01:24 AM
Wow. I think the amount of jaded sarcasm in this thread is actually giving me an allergic reaction. Haven't played ME3, but I can't believe it's that bad. And after seeing the decisions they made with regards to c&c between DAO and DA2, I'm neither surprised nor particularly disappointed.
I guess this is just this week's "let's bash BIO" thread.
Now, where are my antihistamines?
It seems to be this forum is full of grumpy old men. I mean, I agree with most of the problems people here have with BIO's games, but I still like them enough to enjoy playing them. What's wrong with you people?
#13
Posted 20 March 2012 - 01:57 AM
#14
Posted 20 March 2012 - 01:59 AM
but I still like them enough to enjoy playing them.
So do I, but I don't see a reason why I can't poke fun at their rather clear faws
There is a difference between the ironic "haw haw, I don't know what they were thinking" and the "they have violated everything good and holy and I wish they would be erased from existence" that tends to come from certain hamster.
#15
Posted 20 March 2012 - 03:47 AM
but I still like them enough to enjoy playing them.
So do I, but I don't see a reason why I can't poke fun at their rather clear faws
There is a difference between the ironic "haw haw, I don't know what they were thinking" and the "they have violated everything good and holy and I wish they would be erased from existence" that tends to come from certain hamster.

At this point I'm just pouring oil on the fire for the heck of it - the last BW game I played was ME2 and its going to stay that way in the foreseeable future. I'm not really concerned what they're doing at all - but I do have a reputation to uphold.
Edited by Drowsy Emperor, 20 March 2012 - 03:49 AM.
#16
Posted 20 March 2012 - 05:23 AM
I doubt the former will happen. How could they get a better budget for DA3 than they got for DA2? Can they manage the project well enough to cover for that? Will multiplayer get tacked on?
#17
Posted 20 March 2012 - 06:29 AM
Hopefully they get a better budget this time around. And that they've generally learned from the flaws that hurt Dragon Age 2.
I doubt the former will happen. How could they get a better budget for DA3 than they got for DA2? Can they manage the project well enough to cover for that? Will multiplayer get tacked on?
EA want all games to be MP it's policy. I can't see how you can shoehorn it into DA3 like you could into ME though, unless they completely drop the tactics side of things in favour of full AI and a more Kingdoms of Amular system. I'd actually find that quite interesting, but it would not be Dragon Age.
Edited by BobSmith101, 20 March 2012 - 06:30 AM.
#18
Posted 20 March 2012 - 09:13 AM
I'm sure everyone bought ME3 for the sweet multiplayer action.
I'd like to see an rpg that is more interested in creating a sense of adventure than focusing on poorly implemented relationships between badly designed characters. it will never happen though, bioware is too obsessed with voice acting and failed emulation of joss whedonesque relationships and second rate battlestar galactica dramatics.
maybe i should just replay planescape torment or baldur's gate again for the millionth time
#19
Posted 20 March 2012 - 09:57 AM
#20
Posted 20 March 2012 - 10:40 AM
Maybe. But the proof it doesn't hurt as much as they say is that some women have been known to become pregnant, after giving birth once! I could comment further on the Bio love/hate thing by extending the analogy, but I'm under enough scrutiny as it is.That would be like a midwife that had never given birth. It can't hurt as much as they say, right?
As for DA3 MP, I actually quite like the idea. The old IE games were multiplayer, but I think gameplay design would have to steer away from "awesome" and towards "tactical". Maybe they'll adapt some ideas from TOR?
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Sign In
Create Account



Back to top









