Jump to content

AndreaColombo

Members
  • Posts

    5767
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    44

Everything posted by AndreaColombo

  1. Typos here please Eric keeps an eye on that thread, but doesn't on the tech forum as a whole; opening a thread for new typos is very likely to be ignored.
  2. Typo in Aegis of Loyalty description reported here ("severed" should be "severe")
  3. Well, they are endgame powers; they need to have some oomph (especially after the considerably lackluster 7th-level powers.) Considering the Focus they cost, I don't think they're OP. It's fine for a Cipher to have Focus aplenty at level 15 (and they can't open the fight with those powers anyway; Wizards can open with their novafest right away.)
  4. ^ to the best of my knowledge it was always like that? I'll try and test later for the sake of safety.
  5. I suggest reporting this in the tech forums, along with a saved game that exhibits the issue and your output.log file. QA will pick it up.
  6. Fairly sure n. 2 has already been reported and acknowledged; hopefully it will be fixed in 3.02. I haven't experienced n. 1 though.
  7. I love the game but sadly I must concur—engagement is bad news.
  8. In 2.03 it wasn't working either with weapons or spells. In 3.00+ it does. DoT effects still don't benefit from elemental talents; that's a separate ticket and IIRC Aarik confirmed it is still open.
  9. ^ devs said it's not possible for PoE but it will in PoE 2 (if and when, of course.) That said, wording appears fairly clear to me: If the speed penalty is reduced, you'll be faster.
  10. Isn't one of the unlock requirements to deal X raw damage to foes? I know I could unlock it just fine with my Wizard.
  11. True, but the staff is so damn slow compared to using fists ... and it does the same type of damage, so it's not even a good alternative to fist when fighting foes that immune to Crush.
  12. ^ Are you waiting for me to get there and file a bug report?
  13. "has issue" should be "has issued" - Screenshot "was was" should be "we were" (unless it was deliberate because I guess the dude's education's kinda lacking anyway?) - Screenshot Eric, I noticed you didn't fix instances of "I" used as an object—why, oh why? Is it to reflect the fact that many people use it like that despite its being ungrammatical?
  14. I would expect it to slow down your recovery while casting as well, but only way to know for sure would be to count frames.
  15. Zahua's attribute spread has also been fixed in 3.00--I was surprised the Devil's wasn't.
  16. The rate st which you guys are fixing bugs I report is astonishing!
×
×
  • Create New...