You peaked my interest. Please elaborate on why his rhetoric is correct?
Basically the core idea is that by being part of the culture, it is impossible to also be an impartial outside observer to it, thus it's futile to pretend that you can be "neutral". Your concept of neutrality itself has been influenced by your culture. It feels pretty self-evident and not at all controversial to me.
Also, what he said about Yudkowsky's following more or less holds water.
Thank you.
Why do i get a vibe of Zizek and Lacan all of the sudden...i wonder.
I assume because you've been eating from the trashcan of ideology.