Jump to content
The Community Blog (An Invitation)

rjshae

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    5225

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    89

 Content Type 

Everything posted by rjshae

  1. rjshae
    Yes, my choice of thread title is not optimal. Most of the complaints were regarding character design and being able to make mistakes while building your PC, as you can fairly readily in other games.
  2. rjshae
    They do need to add some little electromagnetic widgets on the headphones to mess with your inner ear...
  3. rjshae
    That's perhaps not the best example of where I was going. How about a 'Bad Eyesight' background that significantly hinders searches and ranged attacks, but you get a bonus to hearing checks? Or a 'Weak Health' or 'Body Odor' disadvantage?
  4. rjshae
    There's been some discussion of how some players prefer a game where it is possible to make bad character design decisions. Given that the game is being designed to avoid bad builds, would it make sense to add optional background picks that deliberately create an unbalanced character? For example, a background pick that starts with the PC receiving an initially negative reception from some key factions, but the pick is partly rewarded by gaining a specific bonus talent.
  5. rjshae
    I tend to think of rangers as a type of skirmishing/scouting class. They could be adept at breaking away from combat, or striking then rapidly shifting position. In this sense they would be rogue-like, although I don't think they'd get the rogue's spike damage. Their ranged attacks are more adept at firing between obstacles, thereby allowing them to better fire into a mixed melee or strike a foe behind cover. Over long ranges though, the accuracy of a ranger and fighter with a missile weapon are probably somewhat comparable. Thus their talents could include things like a Sprinting Shot (take an accuracy penalty but gain extra movement after each shot), Acrobatic Maneuver (to bypass or disengage an enemy), Ricochet (to hit a concealed target), and Point Blank (for close ranged fire).
  6. rjshae
    The one I have a concern about is the dual-wielding specialist for Ranger. I don't see a plausible reason why a Ranger would choose this path since it relies on having plenty of open space; try flailing a pair of scimitars around in the woods and see how soon it takes you to get entangled. To me a Ranger should be better at maneuvering around obstacles and taking advantage of terrain. They would use thrusting weapons like a spear, or short weapons with smaller arcs. As long as they are using suitable weapons, I'd give them a speed and deflection bonus while fighting in the wilds.
  7. rjshae
    My pick would be: March 21st, 3... 2... 1... boom!
  8. rjshae
    So much anger, so much rage... ah, gotta love college football.
  9. rjshae
    Male dwarves should have bigger heads than female dwarves More seriously though, big head tend to make models look like caricatures – less 'elegant'. Just my 2¢ Yeah well dwarven heads need to be large enough to store all the extra ale they haven't swallowed yet. To compensate, female dwarven hips should have evolved to be equally humongous so that their offspring can make it out in one piece...
  10. rjshae
    Because the people who normally would are instead spending $54 $55 $56 million supporting Star Citizen?
  11. rjshae
    There's not much else of substance to discuss at this point, so the troll threads are getting more traffic than is their due.
  12. rjshae
    He's not from the RPGCodex. I am, so is Infinitron, C2B, Hormalakh, mutonizer, Arkeus, Malekith, PrimeJunta, Tigranes (a moderator) ... Despite what many people believe, the RPGCodex contributes good things to the RPG community and has raised a lot of money for lots of the Kickstarters. There's two reasons why people may not like the place - the list of preferred titles, and the undermoderation. I prefer undermoderation myself. No offense and I agree they do some good work there at the RPGCodex, but personally I like to have the sewage filtered before it flows back into my tap water.
  13. rjshae
    Okay, who's got the oil and torches? A pitchfork; we'll need some of those as well.
  14. rjshae
    Perfect is the enemy of good. If they took at the time they needed, we'd never see it. It just needs to be good enough.
  15. rjshae
    Kickstarter and video games -- 1st half of 2014, by Thomas Bidaux on Gamasutra. It shows some interesting trends for the year, with observations.
  16. rjshae
    Quick, which way to the intelligent discussion thread...
  17. rjshae
    We had multitudes of people posting here asking Obsidian to "take your time", so guess what... Thanks for posting the update.
  18. rjshae
    In terms of graphical quality, the level of immersion is an important factor. If you are engaged with the plot and the characters, then the graphics can look mediocre and (after a little while) you probably won't care. Otherwise, no amount of eye candy is going to provide satisfaction.
  19. rjshae
    What, this hasn't turned into a romance thread yet? What's wrong with you people?
  20. rjshae
    My expectation is that they will at least recoup the original KS funding, and maybe more. Enough for another game at any rate. But I'm a 'glass is too large' kind of guy...
  21. rjshae
    It's not on yet, but Orphan Black has been renewed for a third season and they are starting filming. Just ten more episodes, unfortunately.
  22. rjshae
    There were no general or conversation skills in the IE games either (barring IW2, I think), and it was already clear back then that Thieves needed something more. There's a reason there was no single-class Thief companion available past the mid-game in BG2. Right, but IWD2 probably represented the pinnacle of the IE series development and hence a model of the future trend. Despite it being a primarily combat-oriented game, it managed to implement 16 of the then-current D&D skills.
  23. rjshae
    Are you speaking from experience with the beta? Do you have a more specific example?
  24. rjshae
    Have a look at 'Manage Ignore Prefs' under your user settings....
  25. rjshae
    The changes to the binary nature are related to combat outcomes, rather than engagement. The engagement is a similar process to selecting a response in a conversation; once you've selected it the event is triggered. I don't see a benefit to changing that.
×
×
  • Create New...