WDeranged Posted January 10, 2016 Posted January 10, 2016 (edited) I remember how I felt betrayed by these repeating quests. I did a few of them because I thought something would happen, but after doing a few of them I slowly figured the game is just feeding me with boring fetch-quests (I honestly thought there were a bunch of BoS kids who wanted to learn from me and then something with plot would happen... Silly me). After that I never picked up any of such quests ever again. You know, something like FNVs Return to Sender, which was mostly a boring slog as well until the awesome ending happens. I recently read that.... So I knew that Oblivion was the last game created with TES' original staff on board, right? By the time Skyrim came out, not a single writer/developer from Morrowind and earlier was on staff save for obvious examples like Todd. This explains why Skyrim is so willing to take a dump on old lore and just not give a damn, as well as why the tone feels so different. Apparently, at least one guy remained on board for Fallout 3. Most of the older Bethesda devs left after Oblivion was wrapped up, but one guy hung around. That guy was Mark Nelson. Nelson was responsible for both writing and quest design, as one of the leads. This does so ****ing much to explain why...I mean FO3 had it's Bethesda-ness to it, don't get me wrong, but it still felt like it did an ok job of holding onto some Fallout elements, such as choice and consequence, SOME of the tone and writing, and just generally having quests that felt like someone put a lot of time and effort into them. Fast forward to Skyrim and FO4, generic radiant quests are in abundance. The simple explanation is because their quest designers have changed. I already knew their writers had started changing starting with FO3, was not aware their quest designers were aswell. So yeah, the jist of it is the simple truth that the same guys who gave you the hand crafted quests you saw in Oblivion or Fallout 3 are no longer working at Bethesda. Who's in charge of quest design now...? Hell if I know, but whoever it is apparently loves fetch quests and combat. Ehh you're basically right but I'd be remiss if I didn't stick up for Skyrim's general quality and charm. It may be missing fresh creative input of many previous writers but they stayed admirably close to what had already been established. It was padded out with fetch quests but the world was interesting enough to make the journey worth it, the game truly feels like a labour of love to me. With Fallout 4 it's as if they took all the things I hated about Skyrim and Fallout 3 (games I love) and turned them into the main attraction. It's every unfocused plot point in Fallout 3 + Skyrim's most soulless quest design, with a copy of Borderlands shoved up it's ass Edited January 10, 2016 by WDeranged 1
HoonDing Posted January 11, 2016 Posted January 11, 2016 i felt betrayed by the lack of b00bies in Morrowind The ending of the words is ALMSIVI.
MrBrown Posted January 11, 2016 Posted January 11, 2016 I'm only level 5 and getting my arse kicked in Lexington. It's still too twitchy for me and, for the love of God, where are the traders? I can't sell my junk anywhere. Don't bother with the items too much, you don't need money that much either. Grenades and drugs have the best weight/value -ratio, naturally.
Amentep Posted January 11, 2016 Posted January 11, 2016 Surprise surprise, I'm enjoying it for many of the reasons cited for not liking it. I'm only level 5 and getting my arse kicked in Lexington. It's still too twitchy for me and, for the love of God, where are the traders? I can't sell my junk anywhere. Drumlin Diner is North West of Lexington, it lies between Lexington and Concord on the main road. There's both a permanent merchant (once you solve a problem/quest) and possibly a wandering merchant that shows up at the location (meaning sometimes you have two merchants there). 1 I cannot - yet I must. How do you calculate that? At what point on the graph do "must" and "cannot" meet? Yet I must - but I cannot! ~ Ro-Man
Monte Carlo Posted January 11, 2016 Posted January 11, 2016 Surprise surprise, I'm enjoying it for many of the reasons cited for not liking it. I'm only level 5 and getting my arse kicked in Lexington. It's still too twitchy for me and, for the love of God, where are the traders? I can't sell my junk anywhere. Drumlin Diner is North West of Lexington, it lies between Lexington and Concord on the main road. There's both a permanent merchant (once you solve a problem/quest) and possibly a wandering merchant that shows up at the location (meaning sometimes you have two merchants there). Cheers 'Tep
GhostofAnakin Posted January 12, 2016 Posted January 12, 2016 When does Boxscar Sally or whatever her name is start showing up in Sanctuary Hills constantly? I can't remember when she first arrived, but she seemed to live there. Every time I'd fast travel to Sanctuary Hills, she'd be there on the street right outside the house with the workbench. 'Course, she might just be stuck there because her Brahmin kept getting stuck on the roof of one of the houses in town. Not sure what is up with that. "Console exclusive is such a harsh word." - Darque"Console exclusive is two words Darque." - Nartwak (in response to Darque's observation)
Amentep Posted January 12, 2016 Posted January 12, 2016 Trashcan Carla. She seems to travel between sanctuary hills, drumlin diner and bunker hill and it's easy to hit her schedule. I cannot - yet I must. How do you calculate that? At what point on the graph do "must" and "cannot" meet? Yet I must - but I cannot! ~ Ro-Man
Longknife Posted January 18, 2016 Posted January 18, 2016 Still obsessed with this: The writer missed a great opportunity to at least be somewhat self-aware by naming the quest "Fridge Logic." :D "The Courier was the worst of all of them. The worst by far. When he died the first time, he must have met the devil, and then killed him." Is your mom hot? It may explain why guys were following her ?
Oerwinde Posted January 19, 2016 Posted January 19, 2016 How did that kid survive for 200 years with no food or oxygen? Ghouls don't age, but they still have to eat and breathe. The area between the balls and the butt is a hotbed of terrorist activity.
WDeranged Posted January 19, 2016 Posted January 19, 2016 How did that kid survive for 200 years with no food or oxygen? Ghouls don't age, but they still have to eat and breathe. He survived on cool, the pure liquid cool that our Lord Todd deemed eminently worthy of your attention!
Amentep Posted January 20, 2016 Posted January 20, 2016 How did that kid survive for 200 years with no food or oxygen? Ghouls don't age, but they still have to eat and breathe. Sure, it was empty when we opened it, but who knows what it looked like when the kid went in! In case anyone isn't sure: 1 I cannot - yet I must. How do you calculate that? At what point on the graph do "must" and "cannot" meet? Yet I must - but I cannot! ~ Ro-Man
Quillon Posted January 20, 2016 Posted January 20, 2016 How did that kid survive for 200 years with no food or oxygen? Ghouls don't age, but they still have to eat and breathe. Ghouls really don't age? Why did Raul keep complaining about his age/knees etc all the time? Was he always been complaining since he became a ghoul? Maybe they age real slow? : p
Lexx Posted January 20, 2016 Posted January 20, 2016 They do age, but slower than humans. Same for super mutants. "only when you no-life you can exist forever, because what does not live cannot die."
Quillon Posted January 20, 2016 Posted January 20, 2016 Then the kid should have been at least over 20/fully grown ghoul in over 200 years given that the bull**** he survived that long. Or they retconned the ghouls.
Amentep Posted January 20, 2016 Posted January 20, 2016 Then the kid should have been at least over 20/fully grown ghoul in over 200 years given that the bull**** he survived that long. Or they retconned the ghouls. Or he really wasn't in there for 200 years. If it was up to me, the ghoul kid and family would have been working with the raiders to prey on the gullible. Some sucker would free the kid and not knowing nothin' about ghouls would buy the story about the kid being in the fridge and reuniting with the family and all, the kid would lead the sucker to the raiders and make sure they got killed and everyone would split the profit. Only the ghoul family decided to flip the script because they were tired of being under the heel of the raiders. So they got the kid to lead the toughest looking suckers home instead of directly to the raiders - always plausible deniability about how the sucker didn't follow the exact script until someone comes along who can actually take out the raiders. Once that's done the ghoul family is free and the sucker is none the wiser. Or it could have been that way had someone thought to flesh out the quest a bit. I cannot - yet I must. How do you calculate that? At what point on the graph do "must" and "cannot" meet? Yet I must - but I cannot! ~ Ro-Man
Lexx Posted January 20, 2016 Posted January 20, 2016 (edited) But how can anyone who lives in the world *not* know of ghouls? They are everywhere. You can pick up a stone and throw it in a random direction and you'll hit a ghoul hiding under some trash. He will be like *GWOAARRarblwarbl* and run straight up to you. Edited January 20, 2016 by Lexx "only when you no-life you can exist forever, because what does not live cannot die."
Gorgon Posted January 20, 2016 Posted January 20, 2016 You guys are overthinking it. It's supposed to be a wild wasteland episode. The reason you can't tell is that it's not even remotely funny. 2 Na na na na na na ... greg358 from Darksouls 3 PVP is a CHEATER. That is all.
Amentep Posted January 20, 2016 Posted January 20, 2016 But how can anyone who lives in the world *not* know of ghouls? They are everywhere. You can pick up a stone and throw it in a random direction and you'll hit a ghoul hiding under some trash. He will be like *GWOAARRarblwarbl* and run straight up to you. Knowing of ghouls and knowing the dietary habits of ghouls in their natural habitat is something entirely different (and I'm not sure knowing to mow down a Feral Ghoul has any barring on non-Ferals). You guys are overthinking it. It's supposed to be a wild wasteland episode. The reason you can't tell is that it's not even remotely funny. Overthinking things is fun, though! I cannot - yet I must. How do you calculate that? At what point on the graph do "must" and "cannot" meet? Yet I must - but I cannot! ~ Ro-Man
mkreku Posted January 20, 2016 Posted January 20, 2016 Kid in a fridge, holy ****, Bethesda are so stupid!!1 Chess-playing, talking radscorpion, no problem, it's canon. Swedes, go to: Spel2, for the latest game reviews in swedish!
Lexx Posted January 20, 2016 Posted January 20, 2016 Actually chess-playing, talking radscorpion was always criticised. As well as all the other stupid stuff in Fo2. "only when you no-life you can exist forever, because what does not live cannot die."
Amentep Posted January 20, 2016 Posted January 20, 2016 Mind you I didn't mind the stupid stuff in FO2 (anymore than in any of the other FOs including Kid Fridge) I cannot - yet I must. How do you calculate that? At what point on the graph do "must" and "cannot" meet? Yet I must - but I cannot! ~ Ro-Man
GhostofAnakin Posted January 20, 2016 Posted January 20, 2016 Then the kid should have been at least over 20/fully grown ghoul in over 200 years given that the bull**** he survived that long. Or they retconned the ghouls. Or it could have been that way had someone thought to flesh out the quest a bit. This one sentence sums up pretty much every quest/plot point in Fallout 4. 1 "Console exclusive is such a harsh word." - Darque"Console exclusive is two words Darque." - Nartwak (in response to Darque's observation)
Amentep Posted January 20, 2016 Posted January 20, 2016 Then the kid should have been at least over 20/fully grown ghoul in over 200 years given that the bull**** he survived that long. Or they retconned the ghouls. Or it could have been that way had someone thought to flesh out the quest a bit. This one sentence sums up pretty much every quest/plot point in Fallout 4. To be honest, more than once playing Fallout 4 I wondered if the production had been rushed on it. So many ideas but much of it is underdeveloped. I cannot - yet I must. How do you calculate that? At what point on the graph do "must" and "cannot" meet? Yet I must - but I cannot! ~ Ro-Man
Gromnir Posted January 20, 2016 Posted January 20, 2016 we got fo4, but haven't played it yet. nevertheless, current discussion makes us curious. in our opinion, bethesda open-world rpgs has always favored breadth over depth. bethesda games has many small quests or encounters but those quests and encounters is, compared to obsidian or even bioware games, undernourished. therefore, am genuine wondering if the feel that content is endemic underdeveloped is based on comparisons to crpgs in general, or does such impressions hold true when compared to oblivion and fo3? HA! Good Fun! "If there be time to expose through discussion the falsehood and fallacies, to avert the evil by the processes of education, the remedy to be applied is more speech, not enforced silence."Justice Louis Brandeis, Concurring, Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (1927) "Im indifferent to almost any murder as long as it doesn't affect me or mine."--Gfted1 (September 30, 2019)
WDeranged Posted January 20, 2016 Posted January 20, 2016 we got fo4, but haven't played it yet. nevertheless, current discussion makes us curious. in our opinion, bethesda open-world rpgs has always favored breadth over depth. bethesda games has many small quests or encounters but those quests and encounters is, compared to obsidian or even bioware games, undernourished. therefore, am genuine wondering if the feel that content is endemic underdeveloped is based on comparisons to crpgs in general, or does such impressions hold true when compared to oblivion and fo3? HA! Good Fun! Speaking as a long time Bethesda fanboi with a medically dangerous number of hours logged in their games I'd say the quests are under-developed. It's not like Morrowind or Oblivion had many branching paths but the quests were at least interesting or humorous, Fallout 3 is a wonderland of choices compared to Fallout 4.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now