Jump to content

Kate and Williams Baby


BruceVC

Recommended Posts

I never said it was wrong for them to have money but its different because their sources of income were not optional to the payer as they are when a person purchases a product or service.

They're part of the government, and at one point were the whole of it. Governments do not define what they 'offer' as products or services as a company would, but as obligations. I'm obligated to pay for the roads, even if I have no car. I'm obligated to pay for defence, even if I think we have no enemies. I'm obligated to pay for ludicrous self voted benefits for politicians, even if I regard most of them as utterly worthless. And if I decide not to pay for it? Well, they won't lop my head off and distribute bits of my corpse to the four corners (or leave a horse's head in my bed), but I simply do not have the option to refuse.

 

Queenie is awesome because as a consequence I don't get President John Key/ Helen Clarke/ John Minto/ John Banks/ Kim DotCom/ Richie McCaw/ Judy Bailey/ Tim Shadbolt/ Jim Bolger. And thank god for that.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most of the treasures of the English crown are held in perpetuity by the monarchy for the people, such as most of our museum exhibits, a goodly number of stately houses and so and so forth. If these were figured into the Queens holdings she'd probably be considered the richest woman on earth.

 

I don't particularly mind paying for her majesty's upkeep, however Charles is another matter, the man's a spendthrift.

Quite an experience to live in misery isn't it? That's what it is to be married with children.

I've seen things you people can't even imagine. Pearly Kings glittering on the Elephant and Castle, Morris Men dancing 'til the last light of midsummer. I watched Druid fires burning in the ruins of Stonehenge, and Yorkshiremen gurning for prizes. All these things will be lost in time, like alopecia on a skinhead. Time for tiffin.

 

Tea for the teapot!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do they actually consider the royal family "English" these days? It used to be the norse Normans, the french Angevins, the scottish Stuarts, the dutch Oranje, the german Hannovers (I seem to remember a funny anecdote about name changes during WWI because it wasn't fashionable to be German in England at the time)... what are they these days?

“He who joyfully marches to music in rank and file has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would surely suffice.” - Albert Einstein
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, it's a bit of a mix. The Windsor's as the House of Windsor is relatively recent. They were originally the Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, but changed the name around WWI due to the germanic aspect. But it's not as if they've really been marrying outside the country that much for awhile.

 

Queen Victoria was of the House of Hanover, and she married Albert who was of the Saxe-Coburg's..  So yes, there's a heavy mix of German in there.

George V's mother was danish, and he married Mary of Teck, an English lady.

George VI was married to Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon, another English Lady. You'll mostly remember her as the Queen Mum.

Queen Elizabeth II married Philip and he's of Greece and Denmark.

 

But yes, they're pretty much considered English.

"Cuius testiculos habeas, habeas cardia et cerebellum."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Technically Raithe, 300 years ago wasn't George's monarchy, it was William and Mary after James II got run out due to being Catholic. And I think a lot of the money you probably consider "seed" money for the royals is actually money generated after the Kings lost royal authority (as that's part of the reason for the English Civil War in 1600's).

Victor of the 5 year fan fic competition!

 

Kevin Butler will awesome your face off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Technically Raithe, 300 years ago wasn't George's monarchy, it was William and Mary after James II got run out due to being Catholic. And I think a lot of the money you probably consider "seed" money for the royals is actually money generated after the Kings lost royal authority (as that's part of the reason for the English Civil War in 1600's).

George I was 1714, so it's only a year out. William III and Mary II were both dead and Anne was queen in 1713.

 

Oddly, Charles II actually got most of the royal powers back after Ollie's rebellion though he didn't do anything much with them, but that was how James II was able to turn much of the country against him by trying to reestablish absolutism. Ironically it was at Bill III's accession that most were lost, though a few persisted even through to Victoria's time. Check out the entries for Bill of Rights (English) and Act of Settlement if you're interested.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, in order to get the throne, William and Mary had to make a pretty big compromise to push a lot of the power back into parliament while the Stuarts fled to France.

Victor of the 5 year fan fic competition!

 

Kevin Butler will awesome your face off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't the time to explain the benefits of Constitutional Monarchy right now, but when I do I shall scribble down a few words.

 

Suffice it to say our Head of State isn't a pygmy like Francois Hollande, a chancer like Berlusconi or a student activist like Obama.

  • Like 3

sonsofgygax.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't the time to explain the benefits of Constitutional Monarchy right now, but when I do I shall scribble down a few words.

 

Suffice it to say our Head of State isn't a pygmy like Francois Hollande, a chancer like Berlusconi or a student activist like Obama.

 

The good news Monte is that Raithe has done an excellent job representing the advantages of the Monarchy :)

"Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is and saw Virtue in her shape how lovely: and pined his loss”

John Milton 

"We don't stop playing because we grow old; we grow old because we stop playing.” -  George Bernard Shaw

"What counts in life is not the mere fact that we have lived. It is what difference we have made to the lives of others that will determine the significance of the life we lead" - Nelson Mandela

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't subscribe to it formally, but I learned last year that I am a believer in the 'vacuum' theory of politics. There HAS to be someone at the top of the pyramid.

 

Assuming this to be true, I rather like that that notional authority is a person weakened by our long history and traditions, and their own lack of perceived authority.

 

A wholly democratic authority would inevitably begin waving their mandate around and attempting all sorts of 'changes' (power grabs).

 

Even if the royal family aren't a net wealth creator I think their function is well worth the expense.

"It wasn't lies. It was just... bull****"."

             -Elwood Blues

 

tarna's dead; processing... complete. Disappointed by Universe. RIP Hades/Sand/etc. Here's hoping your next alt has a harp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apologies for double post:

 

Royal Gift Incinerator at maximum capacity.

"It wasn't lies. It was just... bull****"."

             -Elwood Blues

 

tarna's dead; processing... complete. Disappointed by Universe. RIP Hades/Sand/etc. Here's hoping your next alt has a harp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that Britain wouldn't be 'Britain' without the royal family, just like USA wouldn't be 'USA' without the rebellion, the constitution and the bill of rights.

 

That is all.

"Some men see things as they are and say why?"
"I dream things that never were and say why not?"
- George Bernard Shaw

"Hope in reality is the worst of all evils because it prolongs the torments of man."
- Friedrich Nietzsche

 

"The amount of energy necessary to refute bull**** is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it."

- Some guy 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually if I'm honest, roughly 30% of my support for the Royal Family is based on them annoying the sh** out of people I was brought up to believe are jealous peasants.

 

Or maybe they're just more like scones. Hard to justify objectively, but quite pleasant.

  • Like 1

"It wasn't lies. It was just... bull****"."

             -Elwood Blues

 

tarna's dead; processing... complete. Disappointed by Universe. RIP Hades/Sand/etc. Here's hoping your next alt has a harp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't the time to explain the benefits of Constitutional Monarchy right now, but when I do I shall scribble down a few words.

 

Suffice it to say our Head of State isn't a pygmy like Francois Hollande, a chancer like Berlusconi or a student activist like Obama.

Surely there's more benefit than that, a dignified figurehead isn't all that much to crow about :p

Why has elegance found so little following? Elegance has the disadvantage that hard work is needed to achieve it and a good education to appreciate it. - Edsger Wybe Dijkstra

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who? Oh, right, England. No entiendo el Inglés.

 

I didn't subscribe to it formally, but I learned last year that I am a believer in the 'vacuum' theory of politics. There HAS to be someone at the top of the pyramid.

 

Assuming this to be true, I rather like that that notional authority is a person weakened by our long history and traditions, and their own lack of perceived authority.

 

A wholly democratic authority would inevitably begin waving their mandate around and attempting all sorts of 'changes' (power grabs).

 

Even if the royal family aren't a net wealth creator I think their function is well worth the expense.

It's the natural state of human social organization. It's an inevitability, whether libertarians and marxists like it or not. Even purely "democratic" societies choose/chose leaders (i.e. ancient Athens.)

 

But technically speaking, the British royal family is not at the top of any proverbial pyramid, is it? Excepting the 24/7 news media/celebrity gossip pyramid and the international recognition of families whose fame is derived from archaic forms of thought and government. They might be worth the expense for the royal kitsch industry, I don't know about the UK government.

Edited by AGX-17
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only thing that is inevitable is that power tends to consolidate onto itself. The secret to the success of any monarchy with only the apperance of power and significance is pagantry, tradition and a powerful patriotic association, a wining combination. It's not there because we need it. It's there because it has played this game of careful consolidation for centuries and has gotten really good at it.

  • Like 1

Na na  na na  na na  ...

greg358 from Darksouls 3 PVP is a CHEATER.

That is all.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The queen chooses the government, and is head of the Armed Forces. It's very hard to sumarise how this can be both completely untrue and completely true at the same time.

 

If you can understand how cricket is a sport then you will be on the right track.

  • Like 1

"It wasn't lies. It was just... bull****"."

             -Elwood Blues

 

tarna's dead; processing... complete. Disappointed by Universe. RIP Hades/Sand/etc. Here's hoping your next alt has a harp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only thing that is inevitable is that power tends to consolidate onto itself. The secret to the success of any monarchy with only the apperance of power and significance is pagantry, tradition and a powerful patriotic association, a wining combination. It's not there because we need it. It's there because it has played this game of careful consolidation for centuries and has gotten really good at it.

 

 

It definitely appeals as a source of nationalistic pride.  Honestly you can probably equate it somewhat with firearms in the US.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As an American, I feel completely justified in mocking Brits for letting this particular crowd of clowns mince about in the public eye and with the public fisc.

 

But it's a good-natured kind of mockery.  Like how you would make fun of a friend who develops a premature bald spot-- you don't actually think ill of the guy, as it's just the way he is. Were I British, I'd probably regard the Monarchy as an indulgence, but an acceptable one as an homage to the nation's history.  "Sure she's a weird ol' gal, and her heir is a dimwitted ponce, but we sing 'God Save the Queen' because that's what proper British folks do, dammit."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But it's a good-natured kind of mockery.  Like how you would make fun of a friend who develops a premature bald spot

 

*Burst of laughter*

"It wasn't lies. It was just... bull****"."

             -Elwood Blues

 

tarna's dead; processing... complete. Disappointed by Universe. RIP Hades/Sand/etc. Here's hoping your next alt has a harp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As an American, I feel completely justified in mocking Brits for letting this particular crowd of clowns mince about in the public eye and with the public fisc.

 

But it's a good-natured kind of mockery.  Like how you would make fun of a friend who develops a premature bald spot-- you don't actually think ill of the guy, as it's just the way he is. Were I British, I'd probably regard the Monarchy as an indulgence, but an acceptable one as an homage to the nation's history.  "Sure she's a weird ol' gal, and her heir is a dimwitted ponce, but we sing 'God Save the Queen' because that's what proper British folks do, dammit."

 

You mock your friends that are getting a bald spot? What is the matter with you? 

"Some men see things as they are and say why?"
"I dream things that never were and say why not?"
- George Bernard Shaw

"Hope in reality is the worst of all evils because it prolongs the torments of man."
- Friedrich Nietzsche

 

"The amount of energy necessary to refute bull**** is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it."

- Some guy 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...