Chilloutman

Ah, thats a shame!

While I understand your concern about 'not as in IE' I believe that copiing simplest dumb AI should not be the goal

Agree, problem is dumb AI Dont agree, engagement is not there just for mob control. Its tactical aspect even player have to take in account - I think its aimed to situation where you run away with low health characters to safety to get healed. Now you cant easily get out of combat without of consequences Agree, but it doesnt rule out engagement. IF AI will improve they should make decision if its worth getting disengagement attack to chase ranger or if they should focus on current enemy. This could make interesting combat and unpredictable

Fair enough. That is because most people discussing the issue vehemently have already reached conclusions and presented them in other threads. Even worse, they have all read each other's posts and know what is being said. Well so dont be suprised that I asked what is wrong with it. I dont have time to read all threads on forum

Good job getting into the thread after 6 pages and ignoring them all. *Frankly, I don't worry about engagement mechanics either. I read about first 3 pages, where people complaining about how bad engagement mechanic is, but noone state why

Can someone tell me what is so bad about engagement? Because for me its works as expected. Want to run away from melee enemy? well count with extra attack against you. Where is the problem?

So an anonymous account makes a bad joke about the ferguson-riots and people doxx him/her and their mom in hope that someone will burn their house down. Sounds logical, normal and morally sound. Kinda like the same morals as of certain journalists. Well what do you expect from people supporting criminal who robbed shop and then threaten policeman?

Here is the original edited post by a moderator. You will note that I used the alternate term on myself in the same sentence. I do not find those terms insulting or offensive, and I had not seen any evidence that using them on these boards is against the rules (although apparently they are now). If you want to be an SJW and take insult from those comments that's your choice, I couldn't care less. For every person who feels the need to call me out by name on the forums, there are as many, or more that agree with my statements. And most of you people have only done so because you disagree with me on the Engagement topic. If you feel that calling me out personally and insulting me adds something valuable to the discussion - keep it up, because most of the time it's you people that feel the need to get personal rather than arguing the topic ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ and I reserve the right to reply to you and call you out for it. If you don't like what you're reading, use the ignore function. I dont want to derail this topic - so my last comment on it and i will move on. 1) pointing out that your comments sounds arrogant and disrespectful to others doesnt make me SJW and I am quite opposite in fact 2) I dont understand what do you mean but calling your name 3) I am suprised that you take what I write as insult while when you act similiary to others you dont see it as problem -BUT i am sure it doesnt add anything to discussion as its not related to PoE at all 4) I am speaking only for myself, please dont generalise this If you feel that my feeling about your posts is not correct feel free to correct me/PM me to not derail this discussion any futher Peace

I have to say that I quite like engagement mechanic it just needs some polishing 1) remove interupt for attack of oportuniy (or whatever its called) so enemy can move aout after taking hit 2) improve AI so they dont try to move out of engagement without good reason (aka dont stand in aoe, opportunity to finish of other character etc) And one personal statement: Sensuki i think you are doing great work helping OE improve PoE. But oh god I cant stand your attitude - I AM ONLY ONE KNOWING TRUTH. And insulting all who dont agree with you left and right. Please stop being omnipotent **** (as you call someone storyfag)

It doesn't bother me, but to be honest, the more armored one simply looked better... sometimes less revealing looks simply better. Boobs are just that... boobs... I've seen them more times than I can count.... Me too, but I still like to look at them

Yes. Because guess what? They weren't, they were just products of their age, and most importantly: they were people like you and me. They had a reason why they thought the way they did. People think of them as irredeemable because of the holocaust, but they don't say the same **** of the communists who committed even worse atrocities (holodomor, Gulags) since Stalin was with the Allies. Hypocrisy at its finest. I say same **** about commies...

I know I sounded obnoxious, but I just go blind with rage whenever I smell the good old bull**** "nazis are evul, the worst on the planet!" I don't claim to know anyone's grandfather better than them, but I'm just wary of any nazi bashing bs. I remember Rochus Misch's daughter in that documentary - I didn't know whether to rage or laugh. Basically she was saying how much of a sheep her father was, when she was basically saying the most cookie cutter generic "evul nazi" opinion. Are you saying that nazis were not evil?

Did you consider that just maybe your grandfather actually believed that Hitler was right? That he had good reason to fight for him? I know that all the propaganda teaches us that nazis were less than human bullet sponges, basically evil incarnate, but look beyond that. Please don't derail this topic, this is question for different thread

Cool, I am looking forward to laser weapons, they seemed more civilian friendly than missiles

Sry mr.BAdler but this sounds like you are cooking crystal meth xD

did restore version explain how bunch of guys who dont know each other end up on spaceship that they dont know where its heading or what is purpose of this mission?

I kind of believe in conspiracy that so called 'Drug war' is actually well organized by some lobbist of mafia to keep prices high enough and some politicans must be part of their payroll. Hard to explain why spend billions of dolars to catch pot smokers

Sure, I also can believe that he didn't mean he was going to actually rape the women. It was more about absolutely defeating her in the game But we need to draw an unequivocal line when it comes to acceptable comments. And even if this seem harsh this is more about the principle *cough* *cough* bullsh*t *cough*

Well so these are volunteers supplied by weapons from Russsia Government? that sound like invasion to me

Well if they are there, they definetelly dont want full scale war, because if they use paramilitary forces no-one can accuse them of being there - and by the way, even russia say there are there, but on vacancy Its no secret that volunteers have been streaming across the eastern border into Ukraine. Probably gear with them as well. But an organized army incursion simply did not happen or we would have seen a massive shift in the front. Well, define volunteer with gear . At least where i live you cant stumble across top notch military gear on the streets

Well I think that many games can be considered 'art' in same way as movies can be considered 'art'. If they have some academic value or even if they will ever became 'classic' is other question

Well if they are there, they definetelly dont want full scale war, because if they use paramilitary forces no-one can accuse them of being there - and by the way, even russia say there are there, but on vacancy

You have to love C&C just for music

Well at least you offended Bruce, but dont worry, there is enough of 'Gray Knights' who will support you against his rays of rainbow mind control

priceless