Jump to content

Chilloutman

Members
  • Posts

    2205
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Everything posted by Chilloutman

  1. I never tried to get into series but hell it really looks good
  2. Yeah, I was watching those Russian orthdox loonies for a while now, expecting something similiar
  3. This is priceless - Bruce did you seen it? Its your utopia right here, man you would love to live in that xD
  4. I think I am missing something, on what BS we are pointing here?
  5. yeah so instead of small war it ended up as WW2, doesnt sound any better to me to be honest To be honest, if France and UK would only do as much as honor and execute the defensive alliance agreement that they had signed with Poland, there would be nothing even remotely close to the scale of WW2. Hitler called the bluff of UK and France, which he viewed as too lazy to react, and invaded Poland, allowing his troops to get experience, refine Blitzkrieg and extend economic power and production capabilities. If France and UK would respond to the aggression just as Poland was attacked, war would be over within a month with Germany losing. But it did not happen and we all know what happened next. Thats basically what I have stated
  6. Do you really believe that or did I miss a joke?They even managed to quote Irving in that article. There's actually a lot of truth in that article. The major glaring flaw with it (it's not the only flaw) is the same major glaring mistake so many in this thread are making, and that's a whole people are being blamed for the actions of a relative few. The 'Jews or Judaism' were no more responsible for the acts of a relatively few number of Jewish people than the Muslims or Islam are responsible for the actions of a relatively few Muslims. Yet there's no shortage of people crying out against Islam. There's really no difference between them and the people who blame 'The Jews' for all that a few evil Jewish people did or are doing. Difference is that I dont know about any Jew mass murdering in the name of Judaism. And to be honest I dont like ortodox jews
  7. Welcome to 2015. Where there's people aplenty that confuse the refusal to print filth with cowardice. As well as confuse journalism with filth. What so filthy about crying guy with label 'Je suis Charlie' after 11 dead people working in Charlie magazine?
  8. After very successful space engineers, i present you Medieval Engineers: http://www.medievalengineers.com/ looks quite neat
  9. Where I live there is really very small amount of Islamic people, but even there was leak from one mosque where preacher preached to beat childrens who dont follow koran and to kill any infidel. If there ever is some 'restrained' muslim he should have step up and tell him to gtfo, but guess what? Never ever I heard abou single muslim saying that those teachings are bollocks. Can you imagine priest in church preaching to kill any human being? What do you think would happen if single one do that. I believe whole church would just leave and tell him to GTFO. That is the difference and that is hard for me to believe that there exist any 'restrained' muslims
  10. yeah so instead of small war it ended up as WW2, doesnt sound any better to me to be honest
  11. The dolchstosslegende which put the Nazis in power was grounded on a military overreaction of the entente powers. I believe that is the best lesson from in inter-war era. Of course you could also have handled the Nazis differently but I prefer to use peaceful, preventive means. No. But it was a slow and arduous process as well. Secondly our secularism - specifically the freedom of religion in the Netherlands which was the forerunner at it's time - was inspired by the Ottoman Empire at the time (late 1500s IIRC). Yes process was slow, but why it was slow? I believe its because we didnt have anything else then religion but today we are flying into space. All those scientific discoveries made through history brought us closer to secularisation because they start questioning christian teaching (if you were is space you kind of know that there is no bearded man on cloud here). Same should apply for muslims but for some reason it didnt And Nazis get into power exactly because other powers didnt want war so they give them more and more space until its was no longer in their control and you are suggesting completly same thing
  12. You can never know for sure, but you can at least try. But they didn't get any oil, now did they? Now use Hanlon's razor. It was caused by instincts of xenophobia, while the military-industrial lobby, the oil lobby and the pro-Israel lobby all made their best to declare these wars. Hell, the entire Bush cabinet was practically made out of JINSA (Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs) and PNAC members. War in the ME was pretty much guaranteed with those guys running the show. 9/11 only made it happen quicker. You can't beat extremism with the edge of a sword. You have to be more clever than that. Current Islamic radicalism is a reaction to the powerlessness of Muslim countries in the last 400 years. It is fuelled by a minority complex. Remember, conservative Muslim goat herders do not travel to the West to shoot us. Muslims who live here, experience our society and see how backwards the Muslim countries are compared to the West become terrorists. When we get stable, modern countries in the ME these complexes will disappear. We won't need to wait 100 years for Muslim secularization if we can give it a push in the right direction. Well if we acted sooner about nazi extremism there would not be world war dont you think? Also secularization of christians didnt come from anyone esle then christians themselfs, do you really believe that any other ethnicity forced secularization on christians?
  13. But I already said I don't think we should accept immigrants who outright reject how we live. We should sent them right back. Also, change is due the changing circumstances, it is not to be expected spontaneously. Christianity was also an enabler of barbaric crusades, torture and imperialism, but it changed too, as well. Nowadays it's just a haven for paedophiles, which HAS to be an improvement. The pope's throne was pretty much a corrupt, malign cancer during the Middle Ages. But that changed. Nowadays I almost like the pope. The US blew I don't know how much on the war in Iraq, and that gained them nothing. It was a huge waste of money. Same with the war in Afghanistan - although that might have come with some small positives. I'm sure the Kurds would have wanted the Iraq war and it's aftermath again if they could choose though. If you can waste such titanic amounts of money on nothing, I'm sure they could spend money to promote "intelligent" (that is, old-school) Islam among Muslims and create Western, secular media that would be appealing to Muslims, promote secular Western news channels in Arabic et.c.... The question is just how we can get someone to pay up for these psy-ops. Most politicians are not into playing the long game. Well and how you know that particular imigrant outright reject how we live? In fact they are hiding it so they can do damage I am not sure how to react on wars fueled by US. On one hand you can say that they tried to fix problem at its source in far away country then to wait until they have to deal with it on home soil. On other hand it could be just war for oil. Problem with Meduim which would appeal muslims is it have to be silamic. its endless circle. And you are right that Christians were no better in 14th century, however are you willing to suffer next 600 years before islam finally reform? Also as you may know we have make in past 100 years more scientific discoveries than in past 2000 years. Thinks are moving fast now man
  14. I think there you hit a spot. Problem is that more muslims are in country - the less secular country it is. Just look at Endrogan Erdogan in Turkey to see the pattern Yep - that's the current state of Islam. Believe me, the religion will change - it's inevitable. What we must do is try our hardest to make Western culture accessible to the Muslim world. It's a bit similar to the McDonald's theory of international relations. We must try to create a global, secular world culture to minimize tensions between different religions and races. Peace and secularism will have won the day that Westerners read Rumi and Muslims watch Game of Thrones and listen to Iron Maiden or Lady Gaga. Well but west is already welcoming to all religions which can accept secularism. And islam didnt change in islamic countries for last 100 years. West is accessible to anyone who is willing to accept humanism and if you are not, i dont know why are you trying to get here except to destroy it - then its not so suprising that someone is defending against it. How more accessible west can be? What do you think is so restricting for muslims to integrate? Why muslims can't watch game of thrones - do west somehow prohibid it?
  15. I think there you hit a spot. Problem is that more muslims are in country - the less secular country it is. Just look at Endrogan in Turkey to see the pattern
  16. This should be dated pre Jan Hus execution but his preaches may be mentioned in first Act, but I believe that next acts will touch Hussite movement a lot if they make it into development
  17. Was this swinginess less obcvios in previouse builds? If so, why? I believe there are now 2 problems 1) removed percentage daage reduction was mistake because it was really good and you can have more coherent damage results with it 2) after removing it damage was not adjusted to new system without percentage reduction Why i think it was more consistent? because percentage nicely remove extremes. If 30% reduce 10 damage you got 7 - no big deal, but if it lower 100 its significant
  18. Thats proper passive agression and derailing of topic and then you are suprised when someone just dont have enough energy to constanty feed you with ammo
  19. Either anyone who wants to put a lot of negativity on Islam/Muslims/Arabs, or a radical fundamental Islamist group that's just f-ed in the head. "Ambition" is greater than individuals "Preference" in an organization of nationalists. It's funny, because Neo-Nazis and radical Islamists are, in essence, both extremely Right-Wing Nationalistic. What I want to say is, how many white men did the Nazi's kill? Did they care? Well its hard to compare neo nazi when they were superpower and now when they are small groups. However nice thing you say that is Nationalists - because islam is not so much faith, its much more ideology or state government as comunism or nacism or democracy. Thats why its so hard for muslims to live in non muslim country. And that is why its no problem for other religions - because they can accept secularism
  20. I would say there is nice idiom which would sum it up 'cast pearls before swine'
  21. How easy is it to put on a mask and pretend to be someone else and fight for someone else's cause and ideals? If I was a radical Right-Wing Neo-Nazi, how could I use someones faith I don't like for the benefit of myself and my own ideologies? (This happened a lot during the worst of GamerGate, Anti-GG dressing up as Pro-GG, harassing. Pro-GG dressing up as Anti-GG, harassing. This can happen just as much in the real world as it does in the virtual world. I remember that a lot of people thought the attacks in Norway, by Breivik, was fundamental/radical Islamist before the story unfolded). It might be controversial of me to even ask these aloof questions and speculate/analyze like this but... who benefits from these attacks, in the long run? And what political ideology has been on the rise all of 2014 in Western Europe? EDIT: The point I want to convey here is: Don't jump to conclusions until the story unfolds, and more research has been conducted. Possible but I really doubt that some neo-nazi would kill 10 white mans screaming 'allah akbar' and 'we avenged Mohamed today'
  22. Are you from EU? just asking that because you dont know that we have borders with Ukraine as well...
  23. They are a tiny minority of middle to upper class college educated women who have the luxury of not being dependant on the job and a greater capacity to leave. Keyrock, Barie is right Porn stars are not necessarily exploited and many of them achieve financial success But Hookers, no dude. If they aren't mentally dysfunctional when they start most of them do deteriorate mentally for a number of reasons That doesn't make them bad people but its a most unenviable lifestyle. They are victims of their job and lifestyle and face many obstacles from society on different levels Yeah tell that to asian workers in factories working their ass off to get few bucks to get bread. But its still ok to beat **** out of factory worker in game, right? (well probably not asian guy, that would be racist, but at least white heterosexual guy would be ok no?)
  24. If you switch Putin with hitler and Russia with nazi germany it is strangly correct as well
×
×
  • Create New...