-
Posts
155 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Everything posted by diablo169
-
Romance and friendship?
diablo169 replied to Krikkert's topic in Pillars of Eternity: General Discussion (NO SPOILERS)
Good points, good points. Therefore the tasteful and mature implementation of Romance\Sex should be no issue in the game for people of such eminent technical ability? You cannot write party members falling in love with a blank slate and call it romance. There is nothing romantic about picking the correct choice from a multiple answer quiz. It's just a dating sim when you do that, the affection bars in Dragon Age are a clue that you are infact playing a minigame. -
Romance and friendship?
diablo169 replied to Krikkert's topic in Pillars of Eternity: General Discussion (NO SPOILERS)
The word romance hasnt been mentioned once, Mr Avellone chose his words carefully. There is nothing wrong with party banter and interaction. There is something extremely wrong with writers being forced to construct characters that fall head over heels in love with you. I dont have anything against romance, what bioware portray as romance is laughable. It's masterbation for the player, there is no meaning behind it. I would argue that the only way party romances could work and be well written is if they were between two party members and excluding the very blank faced and generic PC. Thats romance between two characters that the writters have created and I can live with that. -
Romance and friendship?
diablo169 replied to Krikkert's topic in Pillars of Eternity: General Discussion (NO SPOILERS)
This is a role playing game reborn from a bygone era, tactical party based combat, an original and brand new setting. Some of the greatest writers and designers of RPGS ever are working on this project. and what are some people most concerned about ? if they can have a virtual romance ingame...... Seriously get your prioritys sorted, this promises to be at the very least one of the greatest RPGS of the last decade. Be excited about us getting a fantastic game with a grand story. Be less excited about playing dating sim mini games. Look at what Bioware have become, look at what they did with Dragon Age 2, or as I like to call it "Dragon Age : we'll **** anything that breathes!" You add some romance options and the" I WUB MY WAIFU!" crowd decend upon every social media platform and demand more. For gods sake they spent more time making sure you could shack up with people then writing a coherent ending! Stay tuned for Dragon Age 3 : "This time you can date a Qunari!" You put in party banter and flirts, and they want harems. You put in a peck on the cheek and they want full blown orgy sex scenes. Well I say NO MORE! The line must be drawn here! This far no further! I would rather the writers spend time creating meaningful dialogue, where I find out all sorts of interesting things about my party, then waste one second constructing meaningless romantic overtures. Its' one of the reason's I'm so glad this is Josh and MCA's baby, cause I know they wont. You want a realistic and great romance plot to come out of Project Eternity? Give it to people in the third game when the party members have known each other for years and have seen and been through some serious crap together.- 542 replies
-
- 22
-
I dont really mind despite my voting, would be nice for the order itself to show up in the lore somewhere though.
- 60 replies
-
- Obsidian Order
- poll
-
(and 5 more)
Tagged with:
-
Physical Almanac?
diablo169 replied to Bland_Boy's topic in Pillars of Eternity: General Discussion (NO SPOILERS)
Doublefine have spent over half a million dollars just making the junk for rewards, just so you can make a fair comparison. Hence my comment. I dont want the games budget vanishing on making more stuff to reward people with. One of the reasons I picked the $165 reward tier. -
Has potential especially with the souls theme, I just worry that the romancers will want to try necrophilla if you make them playable or companions.
-
A question about beta keys
diablo169 replied to Kevadu's topic in Pillars of Eternity: General Discussion (NO SPOILERS)
I would suggest asking this in the kickstarter comments, Feargus usually answers fairly quickly and I think hes on. -
Make a wish for 3.6
diablo169 replied to hideo kuze's topic in Pillars of Eternity: General Discussion (NO SPOILERS)
How about we make the 3.6 stretch goal NOT to include Furrys. Jesus christ. -
Pledge up, everyone!
diablo169 replied to HumanFlesh+5's topic in Pillars of Eternity: General Discussion (NO SPOILERS)
I've given all I can, and spent way more on this then any other game ever. What we need is more backers, not people giving more money. -
How should the UI look?
diablo169 replied to Rostere's topic in Pillars of Eternity: General Discussion (NO SPOILERS)
I want it to look like Baldurs Gate 2. I like my UI's to have some meat. -
Physical Almanac?
diablo169 replied to Bland_Boy's topic in Pillars of Eternity: General Discussion (NO SPOILERS)
No more Physical rewards, its going to eat up the games budget before its even been made, -
Update #21: 5 days left!
diablo169 replied to The Guildmaster's topic in Pillars of Eternity: Announcements & News
Bit concerned over the choice of streaming site. Twitch.tv is a streaming site for gamers that would have attracted a lot more viewers. Ustream wont have that appeal.- 88 replies
-
- 1
-
- project eternity
- update 21
-
(and 5 more)
Tagged with:
-
Adam Brennecke Live Stream
diablo169 replied to C2B's topic in Pillars of Eternity: General Discussion (NO SPOILERS)
Cool to see you streaming Adam but Oh god, why ustream? its horrid use twitch for goodness sake