Karkarov

Yeap, we all know there are consequences for taking the baby with you, but have no clue what they are. So anything anyone posts in relation to baby consequences (unless they aren't talking about Eora) is just making stuff up.

Yes.

I am not seeing the "I don't care" option in your poll, so I can't vote.

This. Not to mention in Eora we have.... blunderbuss, arquebus, and pistols. No one in their right mind would still be using throwing spears at Eora's tech level, unless they were some back water society or people with no access to anything remotely modern. As for the romans, trust me, if they had black powder weapons and crossbows they would have left their lawn darts at home.

Lul was about to say, "Shouldn't they be their own worst enemies?" Thanks to DozingDragon I can now see one of them screaming about the ship not having enough sails, and if they don't get more sails no they will "go under".

The sentient weapon isn't a companion...

Well to update my own earlier post, mine has now been collected as well. Poor gold pouch is a bit lighter....

Dude Aarik only wiped 9 times. Sure it was intentional twice but come on.... POTD!!!

I am liking that Foxy Persona avatar! Also, no. I have not been charged yet.

Ydwin sounds the coolest on paper, but Xoti is pretty interesting and I think she will factor in heavily with the story.

You are forgetting it is the dev's who decided to give multi classes unique names to begin with. Also you are acting like coming up with a name takes a ton of dev time? It takes like 2 minutes. That said I would be fine if a Wizard Priest was just a "Wizard/Priest". Being able to name your class whatever you want seems silly however.

Tell you what. When Sawyer says he is going to open renaming your class period, regardless of single class or multi, to the game I will say fine whatever. But if single classes can't be renamed (and why should they be???), why should multiclasses be renamable?

No, it would be very very dumb to do so. If you are going to let me name my multiclass combo whatever I want, why can't I change fighter to "Warrior". How will I be able to tell when I am fighting a multi class character since only I have this name? Just no. If you are going to give them fancy class names they need to be consistent throughout. Either that, or don't give them fancy class names at all.

True, but at the same time with the classes all being tweaked, and the addition of subclasses, they may want to make unique talents a subclass thing. I put a question in the twitter pile for it so hopefully they offer clarification in todays stream. So hate to double post, but they asked my question about paladins and well... Sawyer basically said Paladin orders ARE the subclasses. So there will be broad differences. This also makes me think that there is no such thing as a "straight paladin" or "straight priest" potentially. Interestingly he also said priest and paladin multi classing may be restricted. Like no Bleak Walker priest of Eothas.

You still have the sidekicks, at least one Dwarf there. Also who is this second elf companion? Don't count your chickens man, that requires 5mil first. I feel like "godlike" isn't a race just a template. You are still something else too. So to drive the stake in worse it is really two godlikes, one of which is Human three, and the other Amaua two. On the positive side there is only one Orlan as well again, even though they maintained companion level.

I kind of agree, the steward was okay for Caed Nua I guess, but Caed Nua got destroyed so she should be destroyed too to be honest. Why can't you just have an actual ships crew that takes care of the ship when you aren't on it?

The "Poop and Sloop"?

Yeah I was looking at it earlier and Druid is the one ignored class. Between the sidekicks and companions there are... Locked in Single Class on first level- 1 Chanter 1 Cipher 1 Fighter 1 Paladin 1 Ranger 1 Rogue 2 Wizards Potential multiple class options on the first level- 1 Barbarian 1 Cipher 1 Fighter 1 Monk 1 Priest 1 Rogue Conspicuously Absent.... Druid Of course after the first level you can give them whatever you want. But this is the base line. That said if companion 8 happens, I would not be surprised if the replacement Sidekick were a Druid. Also for anyone who is curious Companion 8 is the locked in Cipher. EDIT - Sorry for all the edits changed my mind about formatting like 3 times

You are misquoting. That first line is me, and I have posted many times that I think five is fine. In my opinion the sixth character in eternity was always just dead weight.

They have already said during one of the streams the 7th character is a godlike Aumaua Chanter.

I am not going to spend my time finding the exact spot they say it, but just go watch the fig video and pay attention to the combat scenes. Notice something? There are always five party members fighting. Never four, never six, just five. Common sense rules the day at the Friendly Arm.

Not just that. Most backers are going to head in and add that DLC sooner or later. Great strategy by Obsidian for a last minute sales boost.

You mean stomp. Truthfully I should have said punt. Stunty punting is one of my favorite pastimes.

Now that ships are in the game. They just have to pull a star citizen. Also yeap, in a later post Feargus confirmed it. Funding of stretch goals WILL continue past the closing of the Fig. They are just not yet sure how far past the closing it will last yet.

Posted the same thing myself in another thread. If he is saying what it looks like he is saying, then the funding of stretch goals will continue well past the fig ending.