Only in your world of illogic.
Here's a simple concept for you to start with (ok, I lied, I will try to educate you, it's stronger than me):
do you really think that a government would give money to people, outside their electorate, that didn't give them more money in return?
Do you really insist in believing that foreign grants would have the same net effect on the donating countries economy if the money were channelled straight into it? Really? Do you think you've just come up with some amazing observation that has somehow been missed by every man, from every political party or government department? That is some overpowering solipsism you are saddled with.
Ok, ready for a second step? Money invested in a nascent economy will nurture it into a larger one, i.e. one that requires more trade.
Following so far?
(I am assuming, for your sake, that you are taking on a advocatus diaboli persona rather than just being completely and utterly obtuse.)