PK htiw klaw eriF

Today I helped a friend move, spent time with the girlfriend, and am now going to play SRR.

So, are any British forum members watching massive amounts of porn in protest?

Wals, I think you've had a bit too much to drink.

I'm getting the idea this universe is starting to get too big, though. I hope it doesn't branch out into series of comic books and shows that affect the main cinematic series. I hate homework for movies. Too late, it already happened a few years ago. Not to mention, S.H.I.E.L.D. has appeared in various comic books for decades. The key phrase I used here is how much it affects the main cinematic universe, not the branching out. I'm fine with them adding a bunch of crap on the side, as long as I'm not required to know about it to understand the films. Also, big duh. I know what S.H.I.E.L.D. is. If I hadn't read the comics before, I'd still know it because of the disastrous Hasselhoff flick. Everyone knows who S.H.I.E.L.D. is. Again, I meant specifically to the cinematic canon. But the main drawback of the comic universe is how overcomplicated and large it is. I dislike having to follow five other series of comics just to be able to follow the one I like - I hated having to read ten different X-Men related comics just so I could understand what was going on in Cable & Deadpool. This translates to movie universe as well. I'm fine with the occassional side story, but as far as I'm concerned this new show better be self-contained because if it's ****, I don't want to have to watch it as a homework assignment for the movies. I feel you bro. Nothing is worse than having to read/watch a bunch of **** you're not interested in to get the whole story.

In this particular case I'm going to side with the customer, he had a legitimate criticism and Gaider's response was basically telling him that he is better than him.Unless i'm missing something important from the context. I agree, but Gaider is a oversensitive **** so it is pretty much a given that he would act like a prick.

I drank a huge amount of vodka and passed out in a bathtub.

While I'm not missing the looting very much, I do think having items as quest rewards would have been a nice touch. Also, I think melee weapons could have been more effective.

That must have been quite a bit of white flags.

Oh **** off Wals

I'd say that it's a better use of time than posting rant threads.

Why insult one man when you can insult the entire country? Grow some balls France.

Today I went to work and plan to go out with some friends.

Honestly, if someone is being a real ****, you should just ignore them. 99% of the time, they're doing it to get attention and feeding them will only make it worse. That isn't to say you should brand all criticism as vitriol or anything, just that you should ignore the (empty) death threats and other internet toughguy bull****.

I hope the sequel is better designed. I am loving playing a Custom Kensai character.

I love the Pathfinder system but honestly. it's just not a good system for a computer game. If PE were turn-based, sure, that's a whole other thing. But seeing as it is, I'd say building their own system is a good idea, albeit difficult to achieve. Wouldn't they have had to license Pathfinder anyway (deducting money from the project)? Of course. But I don't think that's really the point because designing your own system also costs a lot of money. Still, there is a game that uses the Pathfinder license. Head over to goblinworks.com for info about Pathfinder Online. Actually, I don't think that is using the Pathfinder system, just the setting. Using the Pathfinder rulesets for a cRPG would likely be legal hell, seeing as you would have to deal with both Pazio and WotC.

I wish that you could save manually, stealth was possible, and that you could cast healing spells out of combat. Otherwise the game is addictive as ****.

Yes, the studios have (more or less) said as much.I don't think its good for the industry. It depends on what you mean by "good for the industry". If you mean "provides a large amount of diverse entertainment without constantly recasting the usual suspects, and is comfortable with several successful films instead of having few wildly successful films" then I would definitely agree.

I dunno, I've always enjoyed the "seedier" side of life. Joining a playboy's entourage probably wouldn't give me time to enjoy that.

You make a good comparison but the reality is men are more lecherous and known to be more publicly crude than women. Also we know that men on women sexual abuse is much more rife than women on men abuse so I would still say the picture is relevant? We don't know if men on women sexual abuse is more prevalent because a good portion of sexual abuse is not reported and there is neither a study that compares sexual abuse data or a universal definition for sexual abuse. The picture is relevant because on subway trains, women are very likely to be harassed by creepers.

That actually is a pretty good example of what a subway is like for an attractive woman. PS: Wrong alt.

I'm aroused and interested in reading at he same time.

nb4bitchingatsawyer From the info available, PE does look like an IE game. It doesn't have kill XP, it uses a "more gamist" attribute system, and missing is less common, but IMO those differences doesn't transform PE into a Diablo clone. In terms of classes, every one but the Cipher is an analogue of one of the 3.5E core classes. Other than that, I'm happy PE is getting away from the D&D, which does not function well outside of PnP.

If PE has a Monkey with a revolver riding on a lamb, it will sell 10 million copies. You can't stop the storm!

I'm going to agree with FlintlockJazz that the appeal of romances in BG2 as the increased amount of content compared to other characters. PST also had content rich characters those characters were well received by most despite not being romances(yes I know your PC could flirt with some characters and have sex with prostitutes, but I don't count that as romance). IMO, the goal for games like PE should be to have companions that have different content based on what kind of relationship they have with the PC, but I see no reason that romance has to be arbitrarily slapped on because some people find it to be incredibly deep(or immersive or whatever). That isn't to say say that romances should be arbitrarily excluded because some people don't like them though. Romances should be included if... 1) the devs want to do it 2) it fits the setting and the characters involved 3) content for other characters and other relationships is not ignored 4) it is well written 5) it doesn't exist as pure fanservice that turns the NPC into a sex doll If PE has a sea battle with a Kraken, sales will go through the roof.