Malcador

No, not like him, but through out the games you mainly encounter them being outright **** to people and using power that way etc.

I guess you couldn't really sway Mission, she seemed the goody two shoes type. Granted, next to the them having watched you be a douchebag to people all game, that shouldn't matter (influence system works so much better). It does fit that in Star Wars, dark side folk tend to be pretty unsubtle in the evil so perhaps that is why Bioware didn't bother with you being a seductive corrupter.

Redeemed it via GOG, simpler for me.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yluv3Gxw3Hk A lack of genestealers.

Your post above mine was aiming for the same point, albeit with more emotes. Not too sure how that was an attempt at cynicism though, is pretty clear that's what this whole affair is from any angle. Not that it is not without some entertainment though, granted the Twitter wars have calmed.

Best way to do streamlining is do it via options as much as one can, barring boring filler combat sometimes they cleave a bit of depth to the game or even the joy some people get out of the tedious tasks (I guess this is 'immersion'). Though I would get a laugh of a checkbox of "Enable fighting through tunnels".

Well, your repeated assertions of "I only really follow this whole gamergate thing because it's good entertainment!" and generally dismissive attitudes towards social issues tend to create that perception. I know that despite this perception, you're not an unfeeling sociopath, hence "facade". I'm not sure why this would be insulting, but what do I know about the subtleties of language, I'm just a dirty foreigner after all. Well if you merely accidentally included a meaningless jab at "my group", as you so charmingly put it (hey, it's almost like meaningless jabs are just this... thing you do, without even thinking about it!), I guess it could've been avoided by snipping the irrelevant parts of the quote in order to prevent misunderstandings. Well sorry for thinking the phrasing was meant to signify that indeed, the quoted part was the only really good part for you Argh, you're one of these quote users. That and this board's editor kind of sucks (to VIM this goes!) How is that a jab at all, though ? You've quoted the part you've decided to get your back up on and it is referecing a set that you identify with based on your activity in these threads. Yes, that was a really good quote to me, the inverse of which isn't 'bad' though - for which other than the crappy styling, the article wasn't. Isn't that stuff what this entire topic is about ? Generally people being ****, abusing sarcasm or trying to be edgy for The Cause ?

Ok, but your shot was about me presenting a facade of detached cynicism, which is wholly inaccurate and if you want to start bringing up posting history, well that is where the remark about you comes in. Easy to follow. As for the part I quoted, did you read all of it ? It wasn't harping on your group only, which you've got your back up on predictably, he or she is perceiving a bizarre stalemate and that one group talking about innovation is lying out of all them, the last sentence hints at that. As for cynical being a good trait, well when it comes to games, it is, there are plenty of liars in this industry. You seem to think that my quoting that part meant everything else in the article was bad, it wasn't, but that part stood out for me. The styling on that article sucks, occasionally it forgets to de-bold the questions. Well, you can **** right off too until you get a Moderator badge, eh ?

Pretty much ECE115 practices taken a bit further here.

News to me that I pretend that here, recalling posts I've made over the years. Though it is amusing as reading your posts on people being condescending or being **** to others, but I suppose Bruce can't be alone in that area.

I kind of want Star Citizen to fail just to spite these cultist-like fans of the game (also the ensuing outrage would be amusing). But space MMOGs are always appealing.

The interrupts didn't make that much sense either in 2 and 3. Hug Tali is..uh..Paragon ? Sniping a guy was Renegade ? Renegade does give that one defenestration though. What is wrong with killing Mission via the Wookiee, exactly ? To get that you've had to do 'evil' things to begin with. Only way to top that would have been MC'ing Carth to kill himself.

Well, it is about the same level as most of the insight in that article, but a thumbs up for your rating. What was insightful to you though ? Details on why and how the audience sucks ? I guess you have to be a **** as always, though.

I kind of want one, but $1400 for one is a bit too much.

The bit about how bad they feel when people slam their games was a bit much, maybe they DO suck. I'm sure Derek Smart thinks his games are awesome and it's everyone else's fault for not seeing it, after all. It is true that even garbage requires a fair amount of work to implement, but that is why you hate designers not the tools guys, no one cares about them, heh. This was the only really good part for me.

Marred by the reflection of the fool with the camera!

Dreamed a friend was dead, hm. Now to make it a reality....

http://www.nodontdie.com/anonymous/ Developer talking about the industry

Two grad students are going to have an easy job.

Like in a host of other places, it seems.

Y-wings dogfighting, ha ha ha. Well that and torpedoes with smoke trail but at this point hardly something. Music could be better though.

Roberts wants more of your money.

Still with Cities, will have to get the mod to use more than 9 areas, the space that is off limits is irritating to me. People are right when they say the real fun of the game is trying to get optimal traffic flow, did something smart this time around and built a highway to the train station and cargo harbor before putting them down

How come? Channers channed up the chan. Ah ok, was hoping it would be something a bit more entertaining than that.

Ah, you're one of these "against Israel == Nazi" people, aren't you?