Tale

I'm actually incredibly excited about the concept. However.... ARGHHHHHH

Yeah, but they're all Chihuahas and Dachsunds. All they need are some tall shoes.

I've made many claims to being a blind gamer. I use a braille monitor.

Commercial sucks, but GLAAD's objection sucks more. It does absolutely nothing to promote violence against homosexuals.

If Shivering Isles somehow miraculously convinces me to reinstall Oblivion, after the difficulty I had uninstalling the dang thing, then I might just have to install those mods, too.

As a former child, myself, I would think a compromise between the parents and government being the best. A village to raise a child and all that. Parents for much of the traditional caretaking. Government when parents are fecking morons.

But, what if I don't want it? My daughter won't get cancer, she doesn't have sex. 4 years later WHAT DO YOU MEAN SHE HAS CANCER?!

Self-defense using a hand gun isn't firing from the hip. It's not about fast draw. You want to look down the sights while you're telling the perp to back off/not move, whatever is appropriate for the situation. There's no time you don't want to be, or at least try to be, looking down the sights. Someone breaks into your house, is "self-defense" somehow holding the gun at your hip? Guy with a knife in the alley, is that supposed to be from the hip?

I hope my computer can run the Supreme Command Demo. UPS dropped off my new card 5 minutes ago.

They're reasonable if you're using a decent economy. What I'm playing now, I can barely even afford shields! I should download and play Scorched 3D. Looks very interesting.

I was always a fan of using guided napalm. I remember the version I played a long time ago you could use it to dig through dirt in a way that breached shields. Fry those suckas in their shields!

I like him too. He was my favorite Doctor Who since Tom Baker and maybe even better!

Scorched Earth You know you like it.

Where are the women like this when I was looking? Sheesh.

If you'd ever fought a fit woman dressed like that, you'd realize the difficulty in hitting her. Probably the most correct statement ever... Well, what if she was like super fat? Die laughing or run away in horror.

And all anyone has to do to prevent being harmed in a car accident is to drive safely. No need for seatbelts. That would be just fine, if you were the only person on the road driving. Let's say you're sitting at a stoplight, minding your own business, not wearing a seatbelt, then someone rams you from behind at 50 miles per hour. Or how about you're driving on the highway at 70 miles per hour, then your tire blows and your car spirals out of control - in the middle of traffic. Or maybe you're driving home at night, stopped at a stop sign, then a crazy drunk driver comes out of nowhere and hits you head on. Or perhaps you're a senior citizen who suddenly has a heart attack behind the wheel, and the car goes out of control, and you collide into opposing traffic (which did happen in my own town). Case closed. Wear a seatbelt, children. 10 points to the person who realizes how this can still apply to the topic at hand.

Eddo posts, the new free association.

Of course.

You are mistaking alignment for a conscious choice. It's not, it's an abstract of your motives and actions. These influence your alignment, not the other way around.

Do I look like the chief investigator of the case?

Depends on the evidence.

What's there to think about?

How about making a game of Alaschu at gunpoint!

Yes, and then there are countries that are the other way around. Just because one thing does not always lead to a negative outcome does not mean that negative outcome should be trivialized.

Is this meant sarcastically? I doubt it's meant literally, but symbolically.