Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ugh, want to make a poll but too lazy and can't think of anything right now. Harassed this thread about this for a bit, because I didn't want to make a topic on it.

 

There's many ways for expression to take place in the game. A pixel can do a lot. Text, Animations, Voice and still pictures/portraits. All tools for a more "representative" experience of the expression the Companion (or your character) is doing.

 

In the attachments below there are some Examples of what I'm flirting with. JRPG's and Anime use lots of "emoticon" stuff that might not completely belong in Project: Eternity (I'm personally not ruling it out, perhaps there is a way to make it super goed in a realistic and acceptable way).

 

Should the Character portraits included with the game also have a facial expression when you are "Choosing"? Instead of a "Red Text: This is a Renegade choice" versus the "Blue Text: This is an Alliance choice" it would be choosing your Dialogue Choice 1 through 3 depending on the expression of your character. Does he look menacing when you want to choose "I'll gut your stomach and stomp on your flesh!" versus having a more serene smiling facial expression next to the "Hey how are you?" choice :)

 

Thoughts?

 

EDIT: Less voice-acting required as the bodily language is conveyed through the facial portrait expression, however it could reduce a few sentences of text in the Dialogue Log because the Writer wouldn't need to write the characters "expressions" every time.

post-44542-0-05653500-1352754574_thumb.jpg

post-44542-0-49240900-1352754591_thumb.jpg

post-44542-0-31595900-1352754607_thumb.jpg

post-44542-0-40326700-1352754625_thumb.jpg

Edited by Osvir
  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For me, the text in planescape torment did all I wanted. As far as emoticons or even the portraits changing like in japanese games, well, I have never actually played a real japanese rpg, but I have played some flash games and that was only appropriate for a silly (way silly, not good silly) storyline. No need for over-the-top emotions imo.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Uh. No. Absolutely not for dialogue choices. The "this is a renegade option!" stuff is so mind-numbingly oversimplified as it was. PS:T couldn't possibly support the likes of this (up to 18 dialogue choices and most not "good or evil"), and even BG sometimes had dialogue options passing five--what, an emoticon for each? No...

 

"Expression" should be narrative and/or dialogic, IMO. Like PS:T or BG's affected dialogue with only initial voiced lines. Look, I know you want full VO and all that, but the less "automated creative handholding" the player gets, the much better it is for letting our imagination actually work. The problem with current action CRPGs like Dragon Age is that they take all the creativity away from the player by using full VO, cinematics, and expressive heads, all of which strip text content. I don't want to be patronised.

 

The only "expression" in character portraits I'd tolerate is the health/damage in PS:T.

  • Like 10

The KS Collector's Edition does not include the Collector's Book.

Which game hook brought you to Project Eternity and interests you the most?

PE will not have co-op/multiplayer, console, or tablet support (sources): [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]

Write your own romance mods because there won't be any in PE.

"But what is an evil? Is it like water or like a hedgehog or night or lumpy?" -(Digger)

"Most o' you wanderers are but a quarter moon away from lunacy at the best o' times." -Alvanhendar (Baldur's Gate 1)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I... dont think it's a good idea to mix western RPG and JRPG approaches to character presentation. Assuming that characters will get highly detailed portraits and PST style text descriptions I doubt anything else will be necessary.

  • Like 1

Only boring people get bored

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I... dont think it's a good idea to mix western RPG and JRPG approaches to character presentation. Assuming that characters will get highly detailed portraits and PST style text descriptions I doubt anything else will be necessary.

 

Took a little smudging there, a pixel or two. I barely did much to provide with the examples (on a touchpad mouse). A professional would probably be able to dish these out like.. like... uhm I don't have a good analogy... like a professional would. Took me about 5-10 minutes on each of the examples (on a touchpad mouse).

 

I do agree, I am just curious if it could work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One way to make dialogue 'visual' / 'expressive' is via the use of stand up avatars. Before games switched to fully animated / voiced dialogue - ie AAA games today - this method was employed by a variety of isometric games. JRPGs are what people think about when they see this:

 

persona-4-arena-review-3.jpg

 

But Western style games have used them too.

 

dis2_screen003.jpg

 

You have to sacrifice a bit of verisimilitude, however, because portraits of this sort do not work very well in stand up avatars:

 

vg_rpg_bg1_edwin.jpg

 

Disciples II, which is where the middle picture comes from, has a great aesthetic style for those looking for a Western take on the fantasy comic book aesthetic.

Edited by Azarkon
  • Like 1

There are doors

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't like the idea of little portraits next to the text dialogue. For one thing, it (often) takes up too much extra space. For another, it's repetitive to see the same pictures for every line of dialogue. Even if they had a set of several different ones (angry, sad, smiling, bloody-injured) it's still repetitive and distracting. And often kinda corny.

 

[ smiling ] is less annoying, imo...if, indeed, one must have such descriptive giveaways in the first place. When there is no voice work to gather emotional cues from, sometimes I'd rather they just do a good job of set-up and writing, so I get a sense that the npc is annoyed or whatever from that alone, without needing any "cues" to lead me. (edit: easier said than done much of the time, I know)


“Things are as they are. Looking out into the universe at night, we make no comparisons between right and wrong stars, nor between well and badly arranged constellations.” – Alan Watts

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some more examples.

 

Tales of Destiny PS2 (takes up the entire screen, you can see the in-game sprite in the background):

97455494.jpg

 

Folklore was commended for it's approach in a review:

93008520071005790screen.jpg

 

Odin Sphere is a Side-Scrolling game but it pretty much uses the Folklore method as well, but in more of a flowing way (characters express themselves with facial expressions etc. etc.)

imgOdin%20Sphere3.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Josh Sawyer has said that they'd consider portraits with different expressions for NPCs. Doing it for the PC would, of course, be... problematic.

 

I'd be cool with that. Plenty of JRPGs have used that sort of thing well.

  • Like 1

jcod0.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Josh Sawyer has said that they'd consider portraits with different expressions for NPCs. Doing it for the PC would, of course, be... problematic.

 

I'd be cool with that. Plenty of JRPGs have used that sort of thing well.

I'm fine when you click on a merchant or a quest NPC and a dialogue window popup box with their mug in it in a corner pops up, or whatever. I just don't want to feel like every time I click on someone to "speak" to them, or every time my companions decide they want to have a chat, that I'm tossed into/stuck in some special window.

  • Like 1

“Things are as they are. Looking out into the universe at night, we make no comparisons between right and wrong stars, nor between well and badly arranged constellations.” – Alan Watts

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, I like the idea of having a portrait of the speaker next to their dialogue and there being several variations of the portrait (at least for major characters) to show different emotions and states of being. I thought that approach worked well in Persona 3 and gave its dialogue a nice sense of dynamism. That said, since some people seem to be very opposed to this idea, a strait-up, plain dialogue box like in Fallout or the IE games is probably the better way to go.

Edited by eimatshya
  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Josh Sawyer has said that they'd consider portraits with different expressions for NPCs. Doing it for the PC would, of course, be... problematic.

 

I'd be cool with that. Plenty of JRPGs have used that sort of thing well.

I'm fine when you click on a merchant or a quest NPC and a dialogue window with their mug in it in a corner pops up, or whatever. I just don't want to feel like every time I click on someone to "speak" to them, or every time my companions decide they want to have a chat, that I'm tossed into/stuck in some special window.

 

Totally situational and for V.I.P's if anything. NPC's, some merchants (not all), when an event happens in the game, for story, etc. etc. Commoners and the like would and should stay true to their roots (like in BG, only in the Log window) if a dialogue thing is considered to understand your companions and the world.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it is a good idea. The persona games do this quite well like some other posters have said and it can't possibly be that hard to make some additional static images from characters in PE. Personally I would still rather see well made 3D character models that are capable of showing emotion and moving hands and such as "pop ups" during conversation. It just needs to be the active speaking character always with the main character on the side, perhaps sometimes the main character gets supplanted depending on who is speaking. Basically what you see in Folklore, or more recently, Guild Wars 2.

Edited by Karkarov
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Exclamation bubbles, question mark bubbles. A teardrop etc. etc. In one game the teardrop kind of falls down into the talk bubble, the exclamation flashes into view and the question mark kind of wobbles, all part of the "effect" and a representation of a feeling of expression.

183098-tales-of-destiny-playstation-screenshot-the-game-begins-with.png

 

Body movements would be fun to see.

 

Even if you are top down isometric I think if applicable onto the companion even things like this could be noticed and seen:

41593_125089857547979_4968066_n.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While I do love when a JRPG has character portraits that change based on the dialogue I don't think such a thing fits in with this game.

 

For example in a lot of JRPGs you'll get characters with portraits or full characters who have different expressions for a variety of emotions. Usually angry, scared, sad, embarrassed, ****y, ect. While I do enjoy these in JRPGs I think that with the tone of this game we won't be seeing simply drawn character portraits. I think it's more likely that they'll have fully painted portraits such as they had in Baldurs Gate and Icewind Dale. Changing the expression/poses on those sorts of portraits is a bit more involved and therefore expensive. So I imagine for budget alone this wouldn't be a real possibility if they wanted to keep that sort of artistic fidelity in tact.

 

So the next option that wouldn't involve repainting a plethora of extra emotive portraits for companions and PCs would be to simply go the emoticon route. While this is inexpensive to implement I feel that it breaks immersion when present in games. While I don't strictly mind it when I'm replaying Grandia or Breath of Fire I'm also a bit more removed from the world in those games. I'm playing a set character and the outcome in the game is always the same so I don't mind them breaking immersion a bit because I'm not as invested in feeling a part of the world while I play. I really wouldn't want a portrait like those from BG to suddenly get tear drops placed over them or that little angry forehead vein commonly used in more anime style games. I just don't seem the styles blending together well.

 

So I say just make sure the dialogue box is more than just dialogue. Write descriptions of what the character is doings while they talk, how they look, the tone they're saying it in, just as you would in a book. While this might be 'wordy' for some I know it's one thing that people really loved about Planescape Torment and personally I think it's the right way to go in a game like this.


K is for Kid, a guy or gal just like you. Don't be in such a hurry to grow up, since there's nothin' a kid can't do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm reminded a little of some of the older cRPGs where the facial icons could express sickness, pain, and so forth. But I'm starting to agree with some of the posters above that it might not work well with this style of game. Well-written text can communicate emotions quite effectively, as can colors and sounds to some degree.


"It has just been discovered that research causes cancer in rats."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally don't like the idea because I could see the log getting a bit cluttered.


"Take your child murderin' god and shove his him up his own ass."-Volorun

 

"...the vote of a black redhead disabled homosexual transsexual Jew should probably be worth the same as at least a hundred white heterosexual Christians."-Rostere

 

"i can think of many women i would gladly sleep with, but not a single one that i would want as a girlfriend/wife... neither real nor fictional."-teknoman2

 

"I'm all for killing dogs in film." - algroth

 

"Iselmyr is the one who did GOMAD... Aloth is lactose intolerant" -ShadySands

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally don't like the idea because I could see the log getting a bit cluttered.

 

I personally prefer the mini-portraits (used in Baldur's Gate with mods), we'll see if EE is using it or not (On/Off button?).

 

156069-baldur-s-gate-ii-shadows-of-amn-windows-screenshot-bickering.jpg

 

Guild Wars 2, edit:

gw2-rb-1111.jpg

Edited by Osvir

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since the game is not going to be full 3d and stuff, I think it'll be cool to see portraits with facial expressions in dialogues (but not in choices). But be serious about it. Not like japanese stuff (stoopid over the top expressions and rolling pictures and texts each time someone talks - it's annoying!).

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

You have to sacrifice a bit of verisimilitude, however, because portraits of this sort do not work very well in stand up avatars:

 

 

What does any of this have to do with realism.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This also works pretty well and could be (important word following) updated, from Super Nintendo (The Black Gate):

Ultima%20VII%20-%20The%20Black%20Gate%20(U)_00015%20(Small).jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we're all on the same page, whether it is included or not (not over the top). Counted for/against/in-between and something like:

 

9 For some sort of dialogue expression (beyond only text), counted "Likes" as well.

- Osvir "Yes"

- Sedrefilos "It'd be cool. Not over the top"

- Azarkon (I think... for?)

- Tamerlane "Josh Sawyer: Considerations on NPC expressions"

- Monte Carlo "Approves"

- Karkarov "Moving hands, Persona, 3D"

- eimatshya "Persona, portrait next to text" (Ambidextrous)

- nikolokolus "Like"

- exodiark "Like"

 

7 Against:

- Ieo "PS:T is fine"

- Hellfell "PS:T is fine"

- rjshae "PS:T is fine"

- Solonik "PS:T is fine"

- Pshaw "Doesn't fit this game"

- KaineParker "Getting the log cluttered"

- LadyCrimson "Not over the top or too much, portrait taking space/annoying" (Ambidextrous)

 

Please correct me if you count/view it from another perspective, just tried to be objective based on arguments/posts/statements/opinions.

 

EDIT: Some Fallout goodiness as well, another cool method:

dialogue.jpg

 

EDIT: Regardless I would say that PS:T is damn fine :) it's just, I can close my eyes and imagine expression, or even non-expression, portraits+PS:T style writing being equal to <3 (For me)

 

EDIT: In my first original post I mention "this thread" but I forgot to link it.

Edited by Osvir

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see some people saying text can work wonders at being expressive. I counter with: This isn't a novel, it is a video game and the only reason text was relied on so heavily in the past was because graphical fidelity was not good enough to actually show emotion on a character. This even extends in some part to terrain, furniture, housing, and other doodads. Graphics are good enough to do this now.

 

Also wise man once said "A picture is worth a thousand words". So if the choice is a thousand words of text or a well made character graphic, I am going to choose well made character graphic.

Edited by Karkarov

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...