Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
phimseto

Planning for the expansion pack

Expansion packs and DLC  

120 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you want DLC/expansion pack content to take place during the main game storyline or take place after?

    • During the game... (Tales of the Sword Coast, Shivering Isles)
    • Post-game... (Throne of Bhaal, Mask of the Betrayer)


Recommended Posts

My only request for any DLC or expansion packs: that it take place *after* the main storyline is completed. I've come to really dislike DLC that adds all this cool stuff during the main game which I've almost certainly already played and beaten at that point. I always felt like I "missed out" by playing the game right at launch. I'd rather new content that serves as a sequel of sorts - whether full on to the main plot or simply "the further adventures of". That way I can enjoy the game in all its fullness, while knowing that everything that comes after adds on to the world and story that I will have already experienced.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is kind of misleading because even with Tales of the Sword Coast you weren't required to replay the game. In fact.

"If the player has already finished Baldur's Gate, the game presents the option of loading a save game which places the player character (and party) in Ulgoth's Beard. Ulgoth's Beard acts as a hub for the new quests introduced by Tales of the Sword Coast."

From the Wikipedia.

I remember doing this when ToSC came out too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know if this question can be anwered until the main game comes out and we can see how things fit together.

 

Remember though that Throne of Bhaal contained a new area (Watcher's Keep) that could be played during the SOA campaign as well as the post-game campaign about the Five.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I hear, if the original game doesn't contain any data for upcoming expansions, it gets really hard for the game from different expansions to ineract from unanother. IE, perks from one NV expansion wouldn't effect how the player wields weapons from other expansions. So, I'm thinking that instead of releasing the game on schedule, they should delay the game for about a year so they can get all the data they need into the vanilla version so that all the expansions can be integrated seamlessly. Then, instead of downloading the whole expansions, we can just download a code to unlock them, saving vast amounts of time.


One recent survey by a Washington-based researcher concluded that Americans were far more willing to participate in cannibalism then they have in the past hundred years. America is a nation that will not suffer abominations lightly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I had to choose, let it take place after the game. I'd like to use my character from the official campaign in the expansion. (If it makes sense from a story perspective.)

Edited by Labadal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The answer may depend a lot on how in-depth the original game is going to be.


"It has just been discovered that research causes cancer in rats."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In BG1, the "expansion" areas were optional and you could load into the expansion areas after you finished BG1 main campaign.

Or you had the option to play the expansion areas with the rest of the game.

I perfer this kind of option. Unless the expansion is suppose to be a continuation of the main storyline.

It all depends on what they plan for the expansion.

Frankly for me it's too early to tell.

Edited by Technatorium

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is an interesting question. I had similar feelings with Mass Effect, probably because there was a definitive and linear story progression. It made no sense for my party (some of which have no more obligation to be with me after the story) to continue going on adventures after the end. Or worse, when the "extra" adventure was supposed to occur temporally between the beginning and end of the game.

In BG I didn't have that feeling; there's no particular reason my group would want to stop adventuring simply because I finished my goal. The BG story was ultimately centered on the protagonist and his personal story; it felt epic, but in a different sense than "I'm Shepard and I'm going to save the world." epic. It speaks to a different type of story that the possibility of continued or alternate adventures exist after or during the main game. That it is an epic personal story, compared to a grandiose impersonal story.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I prefer expansions to take place after the game. I think it's because I expect an expansion to carry out a whole new grand story so I want it to be completely distinct and stand alone from whatever is going on the first game. If it's the dreaded DLC I expect it to just expand the world a little bit so it makes more sense to fit in with the original campaign.


K is for Kid, a guy or gal just like you. Don't be in such a hurry to grow up, since there's nothin' a kid can't do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the idea of post game because they could travel to a completely new place and take part in a totally different story. Moreover, they can have the xpac serve as a bridge between the sequel and the original if this is done in this way.

 

Also, PE already sound outrageously huge. 2 main cities, a 15 level dungeon, bg1 like expore zones, etc.. Adding more to that may not be the best move.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How is Shivering Isles "during the game"? You can start it after you've completed the main quest.

 

I prefer post-game expansions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not much a fan of DLC, but since this is a full-on expansion (and I already bought it)... I do agree post-game seems to make the most sense. And probably feel most refreshing, which is what I think an x-pack should do...


^

 

 

I agree that that is such a stupid idiotic pathetic garbage hateful retarded scumbag evil satanic nazi like term ever created. At least top 5.

 

TSLRCM Official Forum || TSLRCM Moddb || My other KOTOR2 mods || TSLRCM (English version) on Steam || [M4-78EP on Steam

Formerly known as BattleWookiee/BattleCookiee

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The third option would be a mix: some new content and features for the original game plus some level expansion and new areas. Stuff the designers want to add, but lack the schedule time to fully implement. I'm sure it'll be fun.


"It has just been discovered that research causes cancer in rats."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am missing third option in the poll, I would like an expansion where you continue after you finish the main game, and you get new stuff for another playthrough as well. Like new Class, new Race, new Companion etc...

 

The best example of this is the Mask of the Betrayer expansion...

  • Like 1

Sent from my Stone Tablet, using Chisel-a-Talk 2000BC.

 

Let's Play/AAR Europa Universalis 1: Austria Grand Campaign (completed)

Let's Play/AAR Europa Universalis 2: Xhosa Grand Campaign (completed)

 

My PS Platinums - 19 games so far (my PSN profile):

1) God of War III - PS3 - 24+ hours

2) Final Fantasy XIII - PS3 - 130+ hours

3) White Knight Chronicles International Edition - PS3 - 525+ hours

4) Hyperdimension Neptunia - PS3 - 80+ hours

5) Final Fantasy XIII-2 - PS3 - 200+ hours

6) Tales of Xillia - PS3 - 135+ hours

7) Hyperdimension Neptunia mk2 - PS3 - 152+ hours

8.) Grand Turismo 6 - PS3 - 81+ hours (including Senna Master DLC)

9) Demon's Souls - PS3 - 197+ hours

10) Tales of Graces f - PS3 - 337+ hours

11) Star Ocean: The Last Hope International - PS3 - 750+ hours

12) Lightning Returns: Final Fantasy XIII - PS3 - 127+ hours

13) Soulcalibur V - PS3 - 73+ hours

14) Gran Turismo 5 - PS3 - 600+ hours

15) Tales of Xillia 2 - PS3 - 302+ hours

16) Mortal Kombat XL - PS4 - 95+ hours

17) Project CARS Game of the Year Edition - PS4 - 120+ hours

18) Dark Souls - PS3 - 197+ hours

19) Hyperdimension Neptunia Victory - PS3 - 238+ hours

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another vote for Both. Main content takes place after the base game, but plug an area or two into the base game and scatter a few questgivers around the world to make people want to replay first.

  • Like 1

The area between the balls and the butt is a hotbed of terrorist activity.

Devastatorsig.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The team definetly said it was going to be a proper expansion (set of expansions!!!) coming out roughly 6 months after the original game. So I believe it will be a proper stand alone adventure/set of quests etc, with new areas and dungeons to explore, but with your high level characters to bring along to the party !! So expect some real mean ass baddies and monsters to defeat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Though I voted post-game I think the new areas should be available during the main section of the game, with certain areas unlocking with the completion of the main story.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Post-game is fine, but I definitely want added content to the main game (companions!) to encourage me to replay the game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...