Shevek

I hate that these soulbound weapons only bind to certain classes. All weapons should bind to and have effects for all classes.

I wouldnt play without a wizard.

This isnt a MMO. You can build a fighter in a variety of ways and wont have to worry about not finding a group if he cant solo tank a dragon or hit 2k dps.

Well, after a user's third suggestion, I just ignore the rest. I also ignore anything that has zero to do with gameplay. Okay, but you're not a developer so why should we care? Why should anyone care about anything? I suppose it could be because I made the thread asking for feedback because I was curious and wanted to get a handle on what people's top 3 suggestions would be. I mean, what kind of person just jumps into a thread and starts posting without even reading or giving a darn about the original post or the reason for the thread's existence? I guess you.

Its an economy of ideas. If you have to pick three things, you pick three things that really matter to you and you, hopefully, have concrete details to support your salient points. If you have no limit, you start listing every little thing you would change to make the perfect crpg that only exists in your brain. This also legitimizes the data to a degree since all respondents have a ceiling and cant monopolize the input by listing 30 things to some other dudes 1 or 2. Also, by limiting folks to 3, its much easier to use established means of qualitative research to yield quasi quantitative

Its an economy of ideas. If you have to pick three things, you pick three things that really matter to you and you, hopefully, have concrete details to support your salient points. If you have no limit, you start listing every little thing you would change to make the perfect crpg that only exists in your brain. This also legitimizes the data to a degree since all respondents have a ceiling and cant monopolize the input by listing 30 things to some other dudes 1 or 2. Also, by limiting folks to 3, its much easier to use established means of qualitative research to yield quasi quantitative

I ignored everything after 3

Well, after a user's third suggestion, I just ignore the rest. I also ignore anything that has zero to do with gameplay.

Essentially, make the pet optional to the ranger or remove it is basically a bit of feedback/suggestion having to do with a singular aspect of the gameplay - the ranger's pet. But, hey, you want to leave one suggestion, thats fine by me.

You just made what amounts to a single gameplay suggestion. Care to reformat and add 2 more?

Its not about commenting on my suggestions. Its about giving me YOUR suggestions about anything gameplay related. Your top 3.

I am trying to see if I can collect and categorize gameplay feedback/suggests for PoE2 to compile. Chances are this will probably be ignored but I will have a bit of time off in coming weeks - so I am taking this as a bit of a side project. So, basically, give 3 specific suggestions to further improve PoE gameplay for PoE2. Suggestions beyond the first 3 will be ignored as will anything that is not gameplay related. I will collect feedback over the next week or so and then start to compile it. Heres mine: 1. PoE2 should do more with its injury mechanic. Theres untapped potential there. In

The unarmed talent does not work for shapeshift. It is utterly useless.

They are the answer to folks who might have been upset that they backed off their original intent (in the early part of the KS) of having some form of m/c. It is a weak answer.

Why would you sat that? (T_T) They're not meant to be ultimate moves, they're more for adding variety to builds.They suck compared to any multiclassing I have seen in any rpg system ever.