213374U

(w00t) Got any links?

Yep. That's odd but it will be somewhat explained in time. Incidentally, Visas is the only NPC that I have seen so far which you can actually influence, instead of being the other way around.

I guess that was a compliment. Stop trying to justify it. I called you on it. **** happens. The fact is, you did NOT use it as anything other than an insult, and then attempted, weakly I might add, to claim it was not an insult, and his defense of himself was in fact proof of your assertion that he was indeed a fanboy. It's a circular argument that has no objective support, and would not stand up in any reasonable discourse. And so we can be clear, I am simply arguing the merits of your logic, not your point in general. Are you so asinine that for you there are only insults or compliments? If I had wanted to insult anyone, I would have done so openly, as I have several times before. Calling him a fanboy was nothing more than a... description, if you will. Not a compliment, that's for sure, since I implied his objectivity had been compromised, but definitely not an insult. Nobody likes to be told the truth, when the truth is not pleasant, which was proven by his reaction. Thus, my point was proven. I really didn't want to go over this step by step, but since you're making an effort to be obnoxious, you really left me no choice. That's really hilarious. You posted you're 20 in the age thread, well I'm 27 and that explains a lot really about how you express yourself; obviously there isn't a point in having a conversation with you or trying to state a different opinion. I tried to explain my pov and why I wanted to see it that way not to imply that I'm correct and doing it any different is wrong as you clearly do. There's about a hundred different more responses I could give you but it's not worth it as I'm sure you feel the same. Whenever K3 is made, if it is, these comments will be irrelevant. All I can say is that the game can work as much the way you want it as the way I want it. No, I'll tell you what's hilarious. I'm sure there are hundreds of arguments you could use to defuse my claims and destroy my credibility. However, you resorted to the old 'ah, you're just 20' to strengthen your discourse. Got any more high school bullying tactics you want to try with me?

:ph34r:

No, I think your logic is even worse. 'Fvcking jew' is no matter how you see it, an insult. Fanboy on the other hand is not. You are taking things to an extreme to make a point. That is one of the most common logic fallacies ever. There are people here that do that with a lot more of subtlety than you. They tried to use it against me, and failed, just as you have. I am not superior. My arguments are. End of story.

The fact that you consider 'fanboy' as calling names, just proves you are one. Your objectivity has been compromised, and proof of that is the overwhelming amount of arguments you have been given as to why they shouldn't (and won't) make a game in which Revan or the exile are the PC, and you refuse to acknowledge. The only reason you have wielded so far is that the game should be about Revan or the exile because 'um, it should be that way and it would be cool and stuff'. Game over. Uh, that's still a new PC, so I guess you just haven't really read the poll question.

Keep telling yourself that before you go to bed. But beware, if you say 'Mao Tse-Tung' three times, he will appear and start a revolution in your barn!

Whatever kids. Not gonna happen, so keep crying for it. I'm done reasoning with you fanbois.

Yeah, and one that actually implements all the stuff that got cut and left the story incomplete. But for the time being, this will do. :D

Yeah right. Ever heard of Duke Nukem Forever?

This your first post is a masterpiece. We are in dire need of more sensible posters like you.

At the time people seemed to have a different opinion, though. None of that happened, anyway, and as I said, I don't deal with hypothetics. Huh? I think you're beginning to lose the trail here. Autarchy is an outdated idea, it's not feasible even for the almighty US economy. And well, since countries have armies and form defense coalitions like NATO, I think your theory of 'any conquest is unsustainable' isnt shared by most strategists and statesmen. After all, if we follow your reasoning, why have well trained and equipped armies when we can rally some partisan militias in case we are invaded and get even better results?

You ain't seen me flamin'.

Baldur's Gate 2 could do it because: It was the first sequel, and in BG1 you didn't 'lose your powers because of some incredibly lame or outright unexplained reason'. That has already been done for K1 and K2. Enough already. In BG2 you continued your character leveling where it ended in BG1. You weren't the most powerful Jedi in the galaxy, and therefore you didn't need to have your powers reduced due to game balance reasons. So really, there's no comparing the two. And again, it's nice and all to have a sequel. But nobody is going to make a sequel so attached to the previous installments that somebody who hasn't played them will have a hard time making sense of the story. No matter what the devs choose, be it Revan, the exile, dark or light, a lot of people are going to be pissed because 'that's not the way it was!'. Let them come up with a new story with new characters and pray they have the time to develop it to its full potential. If there is any mention of the previous games for those who have played them, so much better. But don't make the game a slave of past stories. Simply, no.

Nope. Kreia stays neutral no matter what.

Euhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh I'm gonna have to thumbs down this one. Yeah dude. How I long for a thumbs down smiley. :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown:

Of course it could be done. Could it be done right? No.

You're actually better off that way.

ok yeah I think that would take the game to a whole nother level of play mainly because now there would be a chance of cutting your own arm off while trying to fight one of these things. You don't actually fight those. They're the size of a small dog and aren't at all aggressive. All they do is cling to trees and stuff. Shooting them dead is easy enough, provided you can spot them. It's just another of those EU things that sucks big time.

while they may not be mutually exclusive, the "real deep" aspect is not present in troika games. vol isn't comparing two things that have nothing to do with each other, he's pointing out the primary focus of two games that don't have "real deep" rpg experiences. taks No. The focus of BL was the role-playing. Proof of this is that you could avoid combat altogether for the better part of the game, except for the last third or so which sucks. If you say that BL focused in combat, I say you haven't actually played the game.

Yes, it does prove my point. The US were doing all they could to prevent the germans from achieving supremacy in Europe, short of entering the war themselves. Germany and Italy had their hands full at the moment, and it would have been suicidal to declare war on the US as things were. History proved that. But anyway, I don't deal with hypothetics. None of that really happened, so your point is moot. Don't be so narrow sighted. I'm not saying that Germany could have successfully invaded the US. I don't think the US govt. considered that a threat, either. However, they didn't want a new power that could consolidate a hegemony in Europe and a large part of Asia. Preventing that was on their best interest, as it increased the US' chances of being the dominant superpower after the war, even more so considering that they were the only party involved in the war whose mainland hadn't been directly under fire. As always, it all comes down to politics. No honor, no good intentions. Deal with it.

Again, you are comparing two things that have nothing to do with each other. The RPG can be 'real deep', and the combat may suck. Those two aren't mutually excluding. That is... disturbing. :ph34r:

The PM I recieved from Chris Avellone. Uh, I don't know if it's actually against the rules to post PMs openly, but it's definitely something you shouldn't do, unless you've asked for permission beforehand. They are called private for a reason, you know.

It is BS. All the forms have the same animations.

Which means you enjoyed BL, despite its flaws. Then we come to yet another contradiction. Your arguments for quoting BL as an example of a bad RPG in your first reply on this thread are... none, since you liked it.