Was that an attempt at wit? Because it turned out to be just the opposite. You shouldn't push yourself too hard, or you may end up making another 'Fallout & chess' comparison.
It doesn't matter, because you don't have to micromanage every second of the combat. Once you have issued your orders, you watch the combat unfold. If needed, you pause again, and change what needs to be changed.
was me showing you want it both ways, you want realism sometimes, and not others, not my arguement for why games don't need to be totally realistic.
I was challenging your opinion, not sharing my own. That is clear if you read.
Where have I stated that I want it both ways? In fact, for me the more realistic, the better. You would know that if you had actually thought about what I write. Oh well, I suppose I can't ask for that much from you.
I'm not lying. It seems you have trouble interpreting mildly complex arguments and comprehending sentences more than five words long.
What's that? Are you giving up? Just because you have been unable to defuse just one of my arguments?
Tell you what, it's about time. Quit embarrassing yourself already.