213374U

Okay. Now get back to Earth.

I fail to see how any of those games is any more replayable than KotOR/TSL (with the possible exception of NWN), but each to his own.

Ah, it's funny to hear people defending unwarranted mass layoffs when their living isn't being threatened. I would like to see you keep your 'all hail rampant capitalism' attitude if you had just been fired because your employer thought the revenues weren't high enough. Funny, in a sad kind of way.

It's not irrelevant when, as company owner, you have certain social responsibilities. No, I don't.

Nice, but unrealistic. Not many people would buy that. I know I wouldn't.

Even though I don't like the idea of a 'gamers union' to bully around game studios, that's not a valid example. Bio is large and well established enough to stand up to the publisher and tell them to shove it if the game isn't ready. Most developers can't afford that luxury.

That's right. After all, it's your business. However, mass layofss to increase profits are wrong.

Hey, sorry man. I'll wait seven years before talking to you again. Oh wait, by then you will be 34. Oh my, it seems I'll never be old enough for you...

No, you shouldn't. People aren't disposable goods.

You hit the nail on the head.

i think thats because Heh. And here I thought it was because

Yep, it seems a high replayability was one of the main objectives of the design team. And thank GAWD you didn't make this a poll. "

(w00t) Got any links?

Yep. That's odd but it will be somewhat explained in time. Incidentally, Visas is the only NPC that I have seen so far which you can actually influence, instead of being the other way around.

I guess that was a compliment. Stop trying to justify it. I called you on it. **** happens. The fact is, you did NOT use it as anything other than an insult, and then attempted, weakly I might add, to claim it was not an insult, and his defense of himself was in fact proof of your assertion that he was indeed a fanboy. It's a circular argument that has no objective support, and would not stand up in any reasonable discourse. And so we can be clear, I am simply arguing the merits of your logic, not your point in general. Are you so asinine that for you there are only insults or compliments? If I had wanted to insult anyone, I would have done so openly, as I have several times before. Calling him a fanboy was nothing more than a... description, if you will. Not a compliment, that's for sure, since I implied his objectivity had been compromised, but definitely not an insult. Nobody likes to be told the truth, when the truth is not pleasant, which was proven by his reaction. Thus, my point was proven. I really didn't want to go over this step by step, but since you're making an effort to be obnoxious, you really left me no choice. That's really hilarious. You posted you're 20 in the age thread, well I'm 27 and that explains a lot really about how you express yourself; obviously there isn't a point in having a conversation with you or trying to state a different opinion. I tried to explain my pov and why I wanted to see it that way not to imply that I'm correct and doing it any different is wrong as you clearly do. There's about a hundred different more responses I could give you but it's not worth it as I'm sure you feel the same. Whenever K3 is made, if it is, these comments will be irrelevant. All I can say is that the game can work as much the way you want it as the way I want it. No, I'll tell you what's hilarious. I'm sure there are hundreds of arguments you could use to defuse my claims and destroy my credibility. However, you resorted to the old 'ah, you're just 20' to strengthen your discourse. Got any more high school bullying tactics you want to try with me?

:ph34r:

No, I think your logic is even worse. 'Fvcking jew' is no matter how you see it, an insult. Fanboy on the other hand is not. You are taking things to an extreme to make a point. That is one of the most common logic fallacies ever. There are people here that do that with a lot more of subtlety than you. They tried to use it against me, and failed, just as you have. I am not superior. My arguments are. End of story.

The fact that you consider 'fanboy' as calling names, just proves you are one. Your objectivity has been compromised, and proof of that is the overwhelming amount of arguments you have been given as to why they shouldn't (and won't) make a game in which Revan or the exile are the PC, and you refuse to acknowledge. The only reason you have wielded so far is that the game should be about Revan or the exile because 'um, it should be that way and it would be cool and stuff'. Game over. Uh, that's still a new PC, so I guess you just haven't really read the poll question.

Keep telling yourself that before you go to bed. But beware, if you say 'Mao Tse-Tung' three times, he will appear and start a revolution in your barn!

Whatever kids. Not gonna happen, so keep crying for it. I'm done reasoning with you fanbois.

Yeah, and one that actually implements all the stuff that got cut and left the story incomplete. But for the time being, this will do. :D

Yeah right. Ever heard of Duke Nukem Forever?

This your first post is a masterpiece. We are in dire need of more sensible posters like you.

At the time people seemed to have a different opinion, though. None of that happened, anyway, and as I said, I don't deal with hypothetics. Huh? I think you're beginning to lose the trail here. Autarchy is an outdated idea, it's not feasible even for the almighty US economy. And well, since countries have armies and form defense coalitions like NATO, I think your theory of 'any conquest is unsustainable' isnt shared by most strategists and statesmen. After all, if we follow your reasoning, why have well trained and equipped armies when we can rally some partisan militias in case we are invaded and get even better results?

You ain't seen me flamin'.