Hurlshort

Haven't we already gone over this before mkreku? Mods are not paid employees. This is not his profession. He does not need to kiss up to members of the forums or play nicey nice with everyone. He is not breaking any forum guidelines by criticizing you, so get over it.

Redemption was neat for its time, but the best parts of it have been taken by other games and done incredibly better.

Is this like suing a car company because some jackass ran into you?

I'm not really comfortable hacking a save game, I'd worry that it might cause issues for using that character on ME3.

Agreed, it's not much of an upgrade over driving the Mako around. I guess it takes less time overall. Anyone else feel guilty about depleting planets?

I really enjoyed the dwarf commoner origin in DA. I actually started with the human noble and didn't feel it, and went with the dwarf next and never looked back.

It's a solid game. Not my top Bioware title, but nothing negative to say about it myself.

Dreamworks doesn't really have to be great though. They produce kids movies and they rake in numbers because of that. I own quite a few because my daughter just loves to watch anything animated.

I haven't even heard of Ponyo, so it doesn't sound like it really penetrated the US market, and the Oscars are first and foremost an American awards show.

Gotta agree on that one. The way he handled the reunion with Ashley was terrible. I tried to choose good options, but he was saying all the wrong things.

It's pretty funny that the guy who played Jayne is basically playing the same character on Chuck.

Bah, if you think you run out of hand cannon ammo fast... try the sniper. You get 10 shots before you run out. Sure, but those 10 shots are all headshot kills for the most part, and it's a slower process. Plus I only use the rifle to pick off the few people off in the distance.

I love the new combat so far, but the biggest change is the fact that I actually use my entire arsenal. I think that might have as much to do with the lack of ammo though, my hand cannon runs out like crazy.

Well, Nightshape did start his post with "this is all personal opinion." I'm going to stick by my position that needing to be online all the time is a serious line to cross, whereas invasive software and disk checks are just not noticed by the general public enough for companies to stop doing it.

How would that even work? Is there an exhaust pipe or something for that?

About the Wii, an entire generation of gamers is growing up playing that thing. It's a huge part of the future gaming scene.

The reason the minigames are different probably has to do a lot with the controls. The matching game in particular would be a headache without a mouse.

I'd say on most DRM measures, yes, but being online all the time can be an issue for a much larger group than a disk check, or invasive software, or even an initial online activation. For example, my PS3 has a spotty connection. It's too far from the router. If I could never play games unless I had a connection, it would be a worthless device. As is, it usually spends a minute trying to connect and then tells me certain services are not available, but the game itself is fine.

That's a big trade! Definitely an upgrade in goal and D for the Leafs. They should be a lot more competitive next year. I'm not sure how this will play out for the Flames. The Ducks had two good goalies, so it's not a huge shake up for them and probably frees up money.

I'm all for getting rid of DRM, particularly the kind that wants you online all the time. I think you are hurting your argument by arguing over the semantics of piracy.

These are the quotes that turned this into a piracy discussion and led to my response: So neither Nightshape or I brought up piracy, just to clarify.

Why would you waste your time arguing over the use of the term copyright infringement instead of theft then?

Quite a few people have hinted at it.

Coming soon, Jersey Shore - The MMO!