Sarex

That is a myth. It would be bad if China fell apart though. One can dream.

Well his point was basically that nothing lasts forever, so he's right. But even so, the US has done a good job of playing the game post WW2. Testament to power in that the reaction to this will be mainly words from other nations. Pretty much this, I wasn't talking about some "holy" crusade against the US or anything similar. My point was when the US system starts falling apart (by internal or external influences) it's going to end up bloody. As for who is strong enough to take down the US, well China is a pretty good contender, Russia isn't that far fetched either (least we forget how history repeats it self(many times)). Agiel and some other forum goers have been drinking too much of the "US is unbeatable" propaganda coolaid that their country has been churning out.

The time will come when the US will have to pay the piper, you can only make so many enemies and still get away with it.

You're not jealous, you are envious.

Any system is abusable given enough time to tinker with it, no matter how much it is improved.

Heh, shorty. XD

Neither am I.

No. YOU and a few other guys don't want pencil sketches. That's all. Stop talking for everyone.

This one loads fine.

My antivirus (Eset) blocked your images.

He's got nothing on BruveVC.

On the Asus forums they said that it's like that and that they won't/can't change it.

Now THIS is a lightsaber! edit: Though here are a few more ideas: http://imgur.com/a/kbOh0

You are a: Conservative Pro-Government Non-Interventionist Cosmopolitan Traditionalist Collectivism score: -67% Authoritarianism score: 33% Internationalism score: -33% Tribalism score: -33% Liberalism score: -33% I don't know what I am anymore...

Called the CM branch in my country, it seems that the new shipment of the Nepton 280L will arrive in the middle of January so I will probably go for that.

This was a discussion I already participated in, with arguably the biggest troll on this forum (not Volo), and it went down the exact same path you have taken it. The gist of it is that there are bigger consistency issues than that in the game. In the end it's not about realism or consistency, it's just about what is popular to whine about at the present time.

But then again that boobplate physics totally ruining our immersion...

No, this was your answer: You don't know, but you go on to justify it anyways. It doesn't matter, let's leave it at that.

Fair enough, but you still didn't answer my question. Also, I don't see how more content will change the core concept of combat or the poor AI or any of the other flaws present, it may at best overshadow them with other things, but that isn't really good either and personally I don't expect it to happen.

Ok we agree on that. But then what was the point of all these changes to the combat then. Instead of changing the combat so drastically from the IE games for the sake of avoiding metagaming/powerplay the dev's time could have been spent on so many better things.

Ah the magical "It's beta"! So you think that in the final game it will be impossible to metagame/powerplay?

Just one problem with that, Josh was against metagaming/powerplay and said that all the changes he made to the combat were going to remove that. So what now? We got bad combat and we can still metagame/powerplay...

I don't even think you need a chip anymore. All I know is the DA:I was a day one release on Xbox360 and ps3.

The sad thing is that consoles are just as piracy ridden as the PC is.