Gfted1
Moderators
-
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Gfted1
-
Youre the one that brought up ethics. My whole point is that the monarchy is a product of the people and at the end of the day the "people" should own the public holdings that they themselves provided to the monarchy.
-
You agree that name dropping positively influenced the sales but feel its peoples fault for getting sucked in by that practice? The onus is on the company selling the product to be clear to the buyers and, imo, that was not the case here and they absolutely knew what invoking those game titles would mean to people. Nobody expected a clone (they don't have the D&D license) but I think people expected a close approximation (like they are doing with several mechanics already).
-
Its a good thing you did, I would have just besmirched that lofty title with some hooker scandal.
-
We'll never know but I don't think they would have sniffed anywhere near 4 million without name dropping the IE games. Similar for inExile and the Torment branding.
-
IMO, it does matter. Until recently, the monarchy is the law of the land. You could literally have been killed for not paying your taxes. Business's are private enterprises that are forced to work under the laws of the land and earn money by providing . True dat.
-
Unless Ive missed some subtlety you seem to be repeating yourself so perhaps I need to restate my opinion. What Im saying is that the monarchy is a product of the people it represents and has created wealth via the taxes of its citizens. Private wealth is earned differently and liking the method is immaterial. As such, imo, the monarchy shouldn't "own" anything, it should belong to "the people".Im not interested in arguing that the monarchy should be disbanded, only in the comparisons to other wealthy families. The stark difference being everyone else "earned" it, while they commanded it. And the less fortunate can suck it.The difference being the "really rich families" didn't amass their fortunes through taxation.Werent all of their land holdings and palaces originally financed by the people? Or they used their own personal fortune to build Buckingham palace?Only if the monkey and lamb can romance each other. It shall be known as Forbidden Wool.When does it go live, midnight tonight US Pacific time?You can create those hirelings by yourself and they probably don't have much of reactivity towards anything, in other words they are mute party members that do what you command, if I have understood correctly. I was referring to this: I read this as there being 16 Obsidian provided joinable NPC's and that the eight hirelings are not Adventurer Hall products. Have I misunderstood?I believe its been stated that one of the ways to acquire new spells is to learn/scribe/steal them from vanquished mages grimoire's.Spoilsport. It was fun watching them pretend you could only learn the game by playing it.Hell, even Ive written and been published.* *In a technical trade magazine, lol.That would be awesome if there was a build that replenishes Health. We can call it the Napper."Three blind mice"What makes you think that the majority of the 73k people don't want Romance. You have to gather statistics somewhere and the official forums are as good as place as any to get opinions of Romance, plus we know from the likes of BSN that Romance is a popular option in RPG so I don't think we need to ask the question " what makes you think people want Romance" when the evidence from the gaming community is clear. The sooner you accept some sort of Romance is a popular choice for gamers the happier person you will be Gfted1, you can't fight the inevitable storm. Don't be the reed in the path of the hurricane I don't give a rats ass about in game romances but if it makes you feel you are "winning" by have less than one percent of backers in agreement with you, more power to you.Spiders wearing water droplets as hats.
