PK htiw klaw eriF

I only speak American and subtitles are a secular jewish pinko conspiracy.

Well I suppose they are generally left, but more social democrats than socialist and more concerned about intersectional boogeymen than class or economics.

Same here. But they had some great funding, they even had their own building with a nice garden, seperated but equal from the others So the stuff from the arts faculty, then ?\ I would say more of the philosophy department. It lacks the horrible prentiousness found among the art students. I've been drinking with both parties during my days in the academia and you'll notice a certain pattern emerging: the former is more about a whimsical idea to spark a debate about anything and the other is more about narcisism with a hint of madness. Also, the philosopher wakes up the following morning wondering what the hell was the point of all that jibberish while other wakes up knowing which people you should put on your ****-list. My experience has been that both are packed with people who think the **** they make up is profound despite it not being particularly good. And they tend to be bourgeois as well. You must've attended a hipster-university, my condolences. True on hating the bourgeois though, but different in how they articulated it. Since the philosophers actually had classes in reason, ethics and morality, they could at least criticize them for being hazardous to a just society (from affording good lawyers to creating laws that benefit only them), the immorality of vices leading to inequity due the potential power and so on. The "artists" just thought that they were the first reading Karl Marx and attended every new kind protest for the sake of protesting. They did posess that raw spirit that one can admire. Too bad it was almost always focused on dumb ****. Oh I was saying that the students of art and philosophy are largely bourgeois. More so than the STEMlords or economics and pre-law students at any rate.

So the stuff from the arts faculty, then ?\ I would say more of the philosophy department. It lacks the horrible prentiousness found among the art students. I've been drinking with both parties during my days in the academia and you'll notice a certain pattern emerging: the former is more about a whimsical idea to spark a debate about anything and the other is more about narcisism with a hint of madness. Also, the philosopher wakes up the following morning wondering what the hell was the point of all that jibberish while other wakes up knowing which people you should put on your ****-list. My experience has been that both are packed with people who think the **** they make up is profound despite it not being particularly good. And they tend to be bourgeois as well.

Wut? Rather than encourage bad parents to do better, you want good parents to do worse? Because of the white supremacist cismale patriarchy? That makes about as much sense as combating obesity by encouraging fit people to work out less and eat worse.

It can be, but we have a few situations that are more relevant at the moment, such as the SPJ thing and possibly a debate panel at a con. I'd much prefer to talk about that than getting into another circular argument with Bruce that clogs up several pages. Ooh i've not heard of this, Return of the Honey Badgers? Not necessarily, a comic con said it would be open to a debate panel concerning gg. At work right now so can't link, but the idea was to get a couple of willing people selected. KiA probably has more details.

It can be, but we have a few situations that are more relevant at the moment, such as the SPJ thing and possibly a debate panel at a con. I'd much prefer to talk about that than getting into another circular argument with Bruce that clogs up several pages.

Nonek mate, remember what we said about engaging people who weren't arguing in good faith?

How did UKIP do?

My understanding of Thor and Mjolnir is that whoever is worthy can hold the hammer and get powers, but they don't become Thor. Which is why I find the girl Thor a bit strange(in a lore sense) as it seems to go against the conventions of the Marvel Universe. I understand that new characters rarely sell, but I do have to agree with Sarex's thrust that the Big2 these days fail to create new characters that last longer than a gimmick. As it is, I believe that female Thor will no longer be the titular character of Marvel's Thor comic and will likely fade into obscurity. YMMV, but I would have preferred a new superhero name instead of a legacy character.

So will Scotland finally get FREEDOM!? Why do they even want to be in the UK when they are not participating in what many consider one's civic duty + all those lose women, alcohol and bacon? The weather.

She's done other videos where that isn't an issue.

http://youtu.be/pOxDtBv9wHs

I don't get it. Can you feel how they are grasping at straws? It feels good, man. Looking at what you've publicly done at your job isn't spying. Sort of a pot and kettle thing with Moosa complaining about shaming people online for opinions. I have no idea who that is. I assume they're standard SJW? If so, it is quite funny.

I'll take the unions over wall street any day. That's part of the appeal for me.

I don't get it.

Yes, still the fact that she has such large support from Wall street is troubling.

Don't you know? Gamers are dead as a culture! Yes we do know, we've been trying to figure out if we were resurrected or are undead.

http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/05/01/bernie-sanders-has-a-better-fund-raising-start-than-republican-counterparts/?_r=0 I'm actually excited about a presidential candidate. Is this what Libertarians felt like when Ron Paul ran?

He was elected as an independent, my guess is that he's going the path that will get him the most attention(democratic primary debates) sort of like Ron Paul did.* No idea how it will work out for him, but I'll take almost anyone over Hillary or Jeb. *I know Ron Paul was elected as a Republican, but his history(presidential candidate for Libertarian party) makes him not a typical Republican.

**** it, I'm with Bernie.

Can we eat doughnuts if we do like it, or do we have to not like it to eat doughnuts now...? What kind of donuts we talking about?

Wow, Sensuki is behind PoE sucking. Was he behind 9/11 as well?

Been fooling around in New Vegas, playing something light before finals. Considering playing BG2 with hidden kits, anyone here have experience with that mod?

I find it funny you're going off on personal attacks and insults, while insulting and attacking. Sawyer is a big guy, he can take the heat.