EnderAndrew

That depends. Who is making it? Atari? Sure, then they might just copy RoTJ all day long.

I don't think the Star Forge plays any part in the story of KOTOR:TSL.

There was a bug that if you didn't level up right away (such as if you were waiting to save your levels to be a Jedi) that the NPCs in your party did not have the same ammount of experience as you. Since you start as a Jedi, I'm not sure this will be a major factor, but I wonder if the bug has been indentified and fixed.

Revan=we'll discover more about Revan, but I don't think he/she will appear directly Bastila=will either be dead, or have a cameo Canderous=likely died alongside Revan T3-M4=playable character but why? HK-47=playable character Jolee=pulling a Yoda and hiding on some place like Degobah Juhani=doing adult films on Coruscant Carth=likely to return Zalbaar=returned to his homeworld now that Revan is dead Mission=is Juhani's costar

That would make sense for where we have seen him before. And frankly, I think that Hades is the main villian.

I dig the Falcon.

I think Revan would likely attempt it to get away from everything for a while.

The Millenium Falcon was an old body with a great engine. I'm not a big fan of the look of the Ebon Hawk, but many people love the Falcon, and thusly it is reminiscent of the Falcon.

I don't want to argue semantics. Name one instance of where you believe the United States started a war in the 20th Century. I'll gladly discuss a nice, specific topic.

I agree that with most FPS, I would prefer a mouse, however, HALO plays better on the X-Box. As for precision, the analog controls on the PS2 and X-Box are pretty precise. Try playing Tiger Woods, and see how the slightest movement changes your swing. The analog joysticks work beautifully for a golf swing. I think the PC works great for games like X-Wing Alliance. You couldn't play that game on a console because there are too many controls. Yet, I still use a flight stick for the game. The mouse doesn't work well enough.

Michael Moore is intelligent. He is also an outright liar. And the United States didn't start a single war in the 20th century. We did have hands in assisting regime changes in countries that already have an internal war going on. That didn't mean we started a war.

There are too many variables with Revan, and he was our PC. How can someone else now write that character in sequels? Revan is going to die.

The new Star Wars DVD's will feature the same actor as the Emperor in the Empire Strikes Back scene to correct the problem.

Considering the state of the ship, Revan was either shot down, or had to dump the ship while trying to escape to the Outer Rim.

Do AA? I don't get what you're asking. And it depends upon the game as to whether or not a console controller or keyboard and mouse is better. I think the Playstation controller in particular is brilliant. It fits the hands quite well, and is very easy to use while providing tons of buttons. Playing games like Madden 2003, I can't ever imagine playing that game on the computer. I had Madden 2001 on the computer, and it was a nightmare with the keyboard and mouse.

I think FU said they wouldn't just add sidequests for the purpose of adding sidequests. So, in a sense, I think most of the sidequests are there because they are supposed to directly add something to the gaming experience. I expect KOTOR:TSL to follow much of the formula that KOTOR was based around. Instead of Star Maps, we'll have Sith Temples. And as far as continuing to play after we beat the game, the devs have said it's not going to happen.

It would be nice to see, but we're just now seeing 3D engines handling facial expressions, which I find more important that hair movement.

As much as people liked Bastilla and Revan, I have high hopes that even better characters will feature prominately in KOTOR:TSL.

Shaq still has two more good years in him I figure. He might get you a championship. I don't know if Yao will ever be a "Shaq", but I might go with Yao because he'd be cheaper, and last longer.

You raise good points again. The United States has been active in dealing with other countries. I think Liberia is a prime example. Yet, everytime we step in, we're accused of being imperialistic. Once again, if the UN did their job, the US wouldn't have to step in. I used to go to Amnesty International meetings in high school. Reading up on places like East Timor really got to me. Yet, on the rare instance that the UN wants to do anything, they send in US and Canadian troops to take action. It's not like anyone else in the world makes an active effort at being a global police force. Eddie Izzard once said that we take offense when you kill your neighbors, but you can kill your own people all day long. The sad thing is, he's got a point. I can't understand how nations of the world still can turn a blind eye to genocide to this day, or transmigration for that matter.

I imagine doing Q&A work is slightly different from the way you'd normally play a game. Perhaps you save your game every opportunity you can, and then from each save, try every option and branch that you can.

Shaq is 32, but through last year was arguably the most dominate player in the NBA still. Yao Ming is still rising as a star. Which would you rather build a team around?

Gorth, That was priceless! TriCritical, You bring up an interesting dilemma. In a certain sense, I really want to agree with you. Life would be much simpler if the United States only worried about themselves. Life would be much simpler if every country governed themselves, and we all practiced isolationalism. Yet, just as individuals need policing, so do governments. We have the UN, whose job is to help in international dealings. It is the right of the UN to intervene in such affairs. Arguably, the UN already gave the US permission to use force, despite the fact that if a new measure had been placed before the security council, France and Russia likely would have vetoed it. (It should also be noted that France and Russia had lucrative oil contracts with Saddam, but I digress). After the fact, the UN seemed to accept the temporary US occupation, and recognized it as a true sovereignty rather than a foreign invading force. There are bad people in this world, who will continue to do bad things. Someone has to try and maintain order. I believe the UN has in many ways invalidated itself. If the UN did their job, the US would not have had to take things in their own hands.

KOTOR didn't have much of an ending. I would like to know what happened to certain characters, but I want KOTOR:TSL to be mainly new characters.

I think many skills atrophy over time. I worked on air conditioners in the Marine Corps. I'd have a tough time working on one today.