ghostwriter Posted September 20, 2017 Share Posted September 20, 2017 So how do you guys feel about them? Also, do you think we should get the option of naming our multiclasses ourselves? Here they are: https://playfig.s3.amazonaws.com/CampaignMediaItem/image/rich_text_editor_image/2017/09/20/fb142528-dd26-4489-8728-3ef2cc6ce87d I think Chanter/Rogue should definitely be Bard... it's the most obvious and appropriate title/class concept out of all the 55. Harbinger isn't too bad, it could be used for Chanter/ pretty much anything other than rogue. Also Fighter/Paladin should be Champion. Crusader brings a religious feel to a class that has nothing to do with with religion. I'd much rather see Paladin/Priest as Crusader. Templar is a reference to an actual real life organization so it feels a little out of place in this setting. Crusader feels a bit more general. There are other names which don't fit too well(Wildrhymer lol)... but these two were bugging me the most. Thoughts? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
draego Posted September 20, 2017 Share Posted September 20, 2017 (edited) There are other names which don't fit too well(Wildrhymer lol)... but these two were bugging me the most. ding ding. Ye that is just wierd but i like them for the most part. It would be nice to rename yourself but there may be in game text that references the name and then your name wont match but that prob not a big issue. i have seen that request in other places Edited September 20, 2017 by draego Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smjjames Posted September 20, 2017 Share Posted September 20, 2017 Being able to change the multiclass title would be a nice option, yeah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Icesong Posted September 20, 2017 Share Posted September 20, 2017 (edited) Not really feeling the Cipher names. Inquisitor is good but not from the perspective of an emphasized Cipher to me(the Paladin names seem mostly thematically good). I was leaning Hunter or Rogue to multiclass, but Seer sounds too primitive and "stalker" isn't the kind of rogue I had in mind. Psyblade is the only one I feel Cipher flavor in, though it's bit on the nose. If we can talk about subclass names here too, I was disappointed to see Wild Mind is apparently just for Serafen. The name is cool and the flavor of being self-taught would have worked perfectly for my character. Ascendant and Soul Blade sound good, but Beguiler is pretty unimpressive, though apt for what it does. Edited September 20, 2017 by Icesong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enoch Posted September 21, 2017 Share Posted September 21, 2017 As I posted in the tweets & teasers thread, I'd have gone with "Theurgist" instead of "Theurge." I know that's the word that the D&D PrC uses, but I've always seen Theurgist used to describe historical practicioners of Theurgy (the 2 dictionaries I have on hand agree), and it avoids easy "The Urge" jokes. In my book, "War Caller" is a good deal more lame than WildRhymer. Should've just named every Fighter/Chanter Edwin Starr. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
injurai Posted September 21, 2017 Share Posted September 21, 2017 Witch seems out of place and doesn't fit. Holy Slayer and Arcane Knight seem uncreative, though I guess they bring some oldschool camp. Hierophant also should be part of the Priest combo... Should probably be switched with Mystic. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dragubaba Posted September 21, 2017 Share Posted September 21, 2017 I was hoping for chanter/priest to be called "Cantor" but now it's what chanter/monk is called. "Celebrant" doesn't sound all that epic. I'm liking most of the barbarian/* names although the name "Witch" sounds more to me like a fragile, casting-oriented person and barbarian/cipher is pretty much all-melee. But I'm beginning to like the idea, might make a witch myself. All-in-all I don't have anything I'd really dislike about the decisions they made. Well, maybe the Celebrant one because I was doing a Chanter run in the hopes they go with the Cantor for chanter/priest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Osvir Posted September 21, 2017 Share Posted September 21, 2017 (edited) Still think Druid/Priest, Chanter/Druid, or Priest/Chanter would've been better as a Shaman. Druid = Nature Priest = Faith Chanter = Spirits Barbarian = Rage Resource/Power pool. What is a Shaman? A spiritual guide. Talking with natures spirits. Meditation and other fluff. Most often in video games having some sort of Restorative or elemental power (Thrall in WC3 for instance, Chain Lightning, Feral Spirits, Far See and Earthquake). Druid of the Bear (WC3 unit) has Rejuvenation. Also, all Druid units in WC3 have Shapeshifting. Druid/Chanter would've been a perfect fit. Edited September 21, 2017 by Osvir Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DigitalCrack Posted September 21, 2017 Share Posted September 21, 2017 So how do you guys feel about them? Also, do you think we should get the option of naming our multiclasses ourselves? Here they are: https://playfig.s3.amazonaws.com/CampaignMediaItem/image/rich_text_editor_image/2017/09/20/fb142528-dd26-4489-8728-3ef2cc6ce87d I think Chanter/Rogue should definitely be Bard... it's the most obvious and appropriate title/class concept out of all the 55. Harbinger isn't too bad, it could be used for Chanter/ pretty much anything other than rogue. Also Fighter/Paladin should be Champion. Crusader brings a religious feel to a class that has nothing to do with with religion. I'd much rather see Paladin/Priest as Crusader. Templar is a reference to an actual real life organization so it feels a little out of place in this setting. Crusader feels a bit more general. There are other names which don't fit too well(Wildrhymer lol)... but these two were bugging me the most. Thoughts? A Crusader is simply someone who fights for a cause. Doesnt have to be a religious cause. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lotti Fuehrscheim Posted September 21, 2017 Share Posted September 21, 2017 A Crusader is simply someone who fights for a cause. Doesnt have to be a religious cause. The name indicates that he fights for/with the Cross, which is very much Christian thus religious. Of course many words are being used outside their original meaning, but your statement does away completely with that meaning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ghostwriter Posted September 21, 2017 Author Share Posted September 21, 2017 So how do you guys feel about them? Also, do you think we should get the option of naming our multiclasses ourselves? Here they are: https://playfig.s3.amazonaws.com/CampaignMediaItem/image/rich_text_editor_image/2017/09/20/fb142528-dd26-4489-8728-3ef2cc6ce87d I think Chanter/Rogue should definitely be Bard... it's the most obvious and appropriate title/class concept out of all the 55. Harbinger isn't too bad, it could be used for Chanter/ pretty much anything other than rogue. Also Fighter/Paladin should be Champion. Crusader brings a religious feel to a class that has nothing to do with with religion. I'd much rather see Paladin/Priest as Crusader. Templar is a reference to an actual real life organization so it feels a little out of place in this setting. Crusader feels a bit more general. There are other names which don't fit too well(Wildrhymer lol)... but these two were bugging me the most. Thoughts? A Crusader is simply someone who fights for a cause. Doesnt have to be a religious cause. I think the question is(as Sawyer mentioned in the update), what provides a clearer character concept? For me, the champion of a paladin order would be the best combatant or fighter in that order. Technically, 'crusader' can be used in different contexts. But it's most appropriate use is when referencing a holy warrior. Same with Bard, it's the name with the most clear character concept. Harbinger sounds pretty nebulous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
esyvjrt Posted September 21, 2017 Share Posted September 21, 2017 Yes, i would like to be able to edit the names, i would be satisfied with it being easily moddable, i suppose they tried to came with a name that could fit a 50/50 base classes, people could have more appropriate names for the specific concept of they characters, that and the fact that i got a little obsessed thinking sub-classes names and ended up with a large list of names that i am satisfied with Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skie Nightfall Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 Well finding 55 combination can't be easy, but I do think they won't mind changing them if good suggestions come along. ✔ Certified Bat Food Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barafundle Posted September 30, 2017 Share Posted September 30, 2017 (edited) Pondering over the right names for these 55 combinations turns out to be a strangely riveting endeavor. Here are some suggestions: druid fighter - earth guardian druid priest - pantheist druid wizard - elementalist wizard cipher - psionic druid monk - hermit ranger monk - wayfarer fighter monk - pugilist priest monk - seeker/aspirant priest ranger - mendicant rogue paladin - holy avenger monk paladin - zealot rogue priest - apostate cipher monk - psimonk wizard priest - heirophant Edited September 30, 2017 by barafundle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ghostwriter Posted September 30, 2017 Author Share Posted September 30, 2017 Wayfarer could be used for ranger/chanter... it's not perfect, but definitely better than wildrhymer. Also like I mentioned in the OP, paladins have nothing to do with religion in this setting. So holy avenger(or holy slayer for that matter) is not really appropriate for paladin/rogue. Hope they change that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DigitalCrack Posted September 30, 2017 Share Posted September 30, 2017 A Crusader is simply someone who fights for a cause. Doesnt have to be a religious cause. The name indicates that he fights for/with the Cross, which is very much Christian thus religious. Of course many words are being used outside their original meaning, but your statement does away completely with that meaning. Not according to webster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Messier-31 Posted September 30, 2017 Share Posted September 30, 2017 All I wanted was a bladesinger. It would be of small avail to talk of magic in the air... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anameforobsidian Posted September 30, 2017 Share Posted September 30, 2017 There was a big thread on this. And I had a massive post I won't repeat here. (BTW: It's interesting that they did not go in alphabetical order, and picked fighter first.) Here's my feelings: Fighter names are solid. Howler for a Barb / Chanter is a bit silly. I still think Skald or Skop would have been better there. I'm not super-keen on Ravager for Barbarian/Monk either; besides the silliness, it's like naming a class "the rapist." Other than that, the names are decent. Warlock, Witch, and Shaman are pretty good choices. The Cipher is decent. Oracle seems more priest-like to me but whatever. Liberator is a silly name for Druadins. Universalist isn't great either for druid priests. Holy Slayer for Paladin/Rogue is a bit silly. Votary is so-so. Contemplative isn't a great class name. Zealot would probably be better replaced by Cultist but isn't a bad fit. Geomancer for Ranger/Wizard is ok, not great, but that's not a natural class combination anyways. Explorer might be better. Spellblade is perfectly fine. Put it together and I think they did a decent job. I only think 7 out of 55 names really need to be looked at. That's a high B. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
injurai Posted September 30, 2017 Share Posted September 30, 2017 I like Universalist, it sounds hermetic to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anameforobsidian Posted September 30, 2017 Share Posted September 30, 2017 (edited) I like Universalist, it sounds hermetic to me. Why not just pick Hermit or Hermetic then? Or Animist? Or Numinate? A Crusader is simply someone who fights for a cause. Doesnt have to be a religious cause. The name indicates that he fights for/with the Cross, which is very much Christian thus religious. Of course many words are being used outside their original meaning, but your statement does away completely with that meaning. Not according to webster Check the etymology section next time you look at Webster's dictionary. It's right there: blend of Middle French croisade & Spanish cruzada; both ultimately from Latin cruc-, crux cross. That said, I think much like Jihad, the word's meaning has changed enough that it fits well with Paladins. Edited September 30, 2017 by anameforobsidian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anameforobsidian Posted September 30, 2017 Share Posted September 30, 2017 A couple of the names were picked up in the previous thread: https://forums.obsidian.net/topic/91412-care-to-guess-the-names-of-the-other-multiclasses/page-2?hl=ascetic Some people came up with names that were moved around and 23 were completely on the mark. Several more names were guessed, but no one got the class exactly right. Witch, Zealot, Hierophant, Theurge, Cantor, Contemplative, Sage, Shepard, Sorceror are examples of this. Zealot in particular was all over the place. The fact that 32/55 were guessed makes me wonder if they actually did look at the page. Of the guesses, I believe I had the most completely right (as of now), but Blotter was close in completely right names and had several names that were picked up for other class combos. Names I wish were used: Iconoclast, Divine Fist, Wayfarer, Heretic, Paci-Fist, Cultist, Nemesis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkling.lithely Posted October 3, 2017 Share Posted October 3, 2017 I'd love to choose my multiclass name as well. In case I go the Rogue/Fighter route, I'm sure my character would not be a Swashbuckler. A Fighter/Rogue might be but not the other way around. A sneaky, two-dagger wielding figure appearing out of thin air is no swashbuckler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lephys Posted October 3, 2017 Share Posted October 3, 2017 One of the Rogue cross-ups should be called "SkullDugger." They would be practicioners of skullduggery, obviously. Should we not start with some Ipelagos, or at least some Greater Ipelagos, before tackling a named Arch Ipelago? 6_u Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rjshae Posted October 3, 2017 Share Posted October 3, 2017 I'd love to choose my multiclass name as well. In case I go the Rogue/Fighter route, I'm sure my character would not be a Swashbuckler. A Fighter/Rogue might be but not the other way around. A sneaky, two-dagger wielding figure appearing out of thin air is no swashbuckler. Fighter/Rogue = Rogue/Fighter under the revised multi-classing system. I suppose you could call the class a bushswackler... 2 "It has just been discovered that research causes cancer in rats." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now