Blame Social Justice Warriors for Donald Trump

[Nonek]

I can't possibly comment on whom Americans vote for, as an Englishman it's none of my business, however I think that any fault with Trump lies with his barber! The man has scissors and a pair of clippers no doubt, act with conviction and damn the consequences, be bold in revealing that baldness.

[Oerwinde]

SJWs exist outside the Internet?

Colleges and Universities are swarming with them, in the student body AND faculty. MSNBC had quite a few, but I think they're receding there. Its mostly the participation trophy generation coming of age without ever having to deal with any adversity and seeing the slightest bit of it as some sort of oppressive conspiracy.

[Hurlshort]

Pretty sure you can argue colleges and universities have always been swarming with such people, albeit with different labels.

[Barothmuk]

Weren't any when I was at college. At least not in any significant capacity.

[ktchong]

He has never run for the White House. But when he does, he talks about his **** size in a presidential debate on live national TV.

 

Donald Trump is, The Most Interesting Man in the World.

Edited March 5, 2016 by ktchong

[Valsuelm]

Pretty sure you can argue colleges and universities have always been swarming with such people, albeit with different labels.

 

Not really. While culturally marxist folks and their deluded zombie followers (a.k.a. SJWs) have existed for quite some time, it's only been in the last decade or so that they finally achieved such great numbers.

 

When I was in college back in the 90s, you could still tell such idiots (who were very much in the minority even at the overall liberal school I went to) what to go do with themselves.

 

Nowadays saying such things are generally banned from all sorts of places (especially internet forums; which historically were far more free) as 'offensive speech'. People in general used to have more backbone, as well had a much greater aversion to censorship and appreciation for the First Amendment. People in general also used to be more social in a real sense. It's the anti-social nature of 'social media' that has lead to much of the insanity now plaguing us methinks. That's a complex thing to explain to someone who doesn't intuitively get it. [And you're not like to intuitively get it if you aren't old enough to have been around before the 'eternal september' and experienced first hand how the internet, cell phones, etc have changed the culture over the years; and/or appreciate just what's lost in communicating via text vs face to face].

 

Even when I was touring colleges in the early/mid 00s SJWs hadn't yet taken over (save for Harvard in my experience (that place being infested much sooner than most other places from what I've seen (holy *(#@$ at the nutjobs I met there); which stands to reason as much of higher academia has tried to emulate Harvard for better or worse for a long time now)).

 

It's somewhat ironic that some (most SJWs certainly) are actually deluded to think the stifling of speech we now have is 'progress'.

 

He has never run for the White House. But when he does, he talks about his **** size in a presidential debate on live national TV.

 

Donald Trump is, The Most Interesting Man in the World.

 

It was actually the immature and vapid puppet Rubio that brought the subject up, not Trump. The whole thing lends a little credence to the probably untrue accusations that he's been in some gay porn, him being interested in Trump's wee wee that is.

Edited March 5, 2016 by Valsuelm

[Hurlshort]

[PK htiw klaw eriF]

A very educational video. You've convinced me that playing ding ding ditch is a cultural marxist scheme to cuck the goyim.

[Hurlshort]

 

Nowadays saying such things are generally banned from all sorts of places (especially internet forums; which historically were far more free) as 'offensive speech'. People in general used to have more backbone, as well had a much greater aversion to censorship and appreciation for the First Amendment. People in general also used to be more social in a real sense.

 

This is ridiculous.  And yet, you are free to continue posting such ridiculousness on this forum, as you have done for years.  You will not be censored, and even if you were, given this is a forum owned by a gaming company, you are free to start your own forum or find others that allow all sorts of extra ridiculous discussions to happen.  

 

That last line deserves a participation ribbon.

 

edit:  removed actual ribbon.  

Edited March 5, 2016 by Hurlshot

[Valsuelm]

This is ridiculous.  And yet, you are free to continue posting such ridiculousness on this forum, as you have done for years.  You will not be censored, and even if you were, given this is a forum owned by a gaming company, you are free to start your own forum or find others that allow all sorts of extra ridiculous discussions to happen.  

Your cognitive dissonance and hardcore ignorance is showing. Evidence of censorship on this very forum is linked on this very page below, and that is by no means an isolated incident of censorship in the land of Obsidian in my experience.

 

On the wider scale that I was referring to (I was not limiting my observation to this particular forum), there are cases of various forms of censorship, in particular in schools, that make national news almost every day. If you look into the Foundation for Individual Rights in Higher Education ,or even the ACLU (they are less consistent in fighting censorship, but they do often fight it) you can find an in recent times ever increasing number of censorship cases, often (though certainly not always) driven by sentiments the SJW crowd holds dear.

 

Much more could be said, but given your usual immature ignorant response, I think it's likely a waste on you.

[Hurlshort]

I'm getting a major case of deja vu over here.  Here is a helpful immature and ignorant picture to demonstrate.  

 

[BruceVC]

 

This is ridiculous.  And yet, you are free to continue posting such ridiculousness on this forum, as you have done for years.  You will not be censored, and even if you were, given this is a forum owned by a gaming company, you are free to start your own forum or find others that allow all sorts of extra ridiculous discussions to happen.  

Your cognitive dissonance and hardcore ignorance is showing. Evidence of censorship on this very forum is linked on this very page below, and that is by no means an isolated incident of censorship in the land of Obsidian in my experience.

 

On the wider scale that I was referring to (I was not limiting my observation to this particular forum), there are cases of various forms of censorship, in particular in schools, that make national news almost every day. If you look into the Foundation for Individual Rights in Higher Education ,or even the ACLU (they are less consistent in fighting censorship, but they do often fight it) you can find an in recent times ever increasing number of censorship cases, often (though certainly not always) driven by sentiments the SJW crowd holds dear.

 

Much more could be said, but given your usual immature ignorant response, I think it's likely a waste on you.

 

Vals I agree with Hurlshot on this one

 

I think you are exaggerating...but just to be clear about what you are suggesting. Are you saying the SJ movement represented by SJW is influencing institutions like schools? 

[aluminiumtrioxid]

Evidence of censorship on this very forum is linked on this very page below, and that is by no means an isolated incident of censorship in the land of Obsidian in my experience.

 

 

Urm, wait what.

Edited March 5, 2016 by aluminiumtrioxid

[Volourn]

Someone say SJWs?

 

 

Patriarchy at work: http://metro.co.uk/2016/03/06/boy-16-faces-rape-charge-despite-sex-being-consensual-5736113/

 

 

BVut, males have it sooooooooooooooo much easier than than females.... :rollseyes:

[Guard Dog]

Someone say SJWs?

 

 

Patriarchy at work: http://metro.co.uk/2016/03/06/boy-16-faces-rape-charge-despite-sex-being-consensual-5736113/

 

 

BVut, males have it sooooooooooooooo much easier than than females.... :rollseyes:

https://youtu.be/G8xp8BQxftE 

Edited March 8, 2016 by Guard Dog

[BruceVC]

Someone say SJWs?

 

 

Patriarchy at work: http://metro.co.uk/2016/03/06/boy-16-faces-rape-charge-despite-sex-being-consensual-5736113/

 

 

BVut, males have it sooooooooooooooo much easier than than females.... :rollseyes:

Yes it correct you dont charge the ladies ...but you shouldn't charge the guy then as it was consensual 

 

In South Africa we dropped the age of consent between young people to 12 and 16....so you wont get charged 

[Darkpriest]

Hahahahahaha oh boy, then we should have around 50% of modern youngs in jails for rape... this is beyond stupid...

[Gorth]

 

Someone say SJWs?

 

 

Patriarchy at work: http://metro.co.uk/2016/03/06/boy-16-faces-rape-charge-despite-sex-being-consensual-5736113/

 

 

BVut, males have it sooooooooooooooo much easier than than females.... :rollseyes:

Yes it correct you dont charge the ladies ...but you shouldn't charge the guy then as it was consensual 

 

In South Africa we dropped the age of consent between young people to 12 and 16....so you wont get charged 

 

 

From Volourn's link:

 

"The case has come before the courts in County Kildare in the Republic of Ireland where the age of consent for males and females is 17. Boys under that age can be prosecuted for statutory rape, but females cannot."

 

I guess the Irish still need to catch up a bit on the equal rights front?

[BruceVC]

 

 

Someone say SJWs?

 

 

Patriarchy at work: http://metro.co.uk/2016/03/06/boy-16-faces-rape-charge-despite-sex-being-consensual-5736113/

 

 

BVut, males have it sooooooooooooooo much easier than than females.... :rollseyes:

Yes it correct you dont charge the ladies ...but you shouldn't charge the guy then as it was consensual 

 

In South Africa we dropped the age of consent between young people to 12 and 16....so you wont get charged 

 

 

From Volourn's link:

 

"The case has come before the courts in County Kildare in the Republic of Ireland where the age of consent for males and females is 17. Boys under that age can be prosecuted for statutory rape, but females cannot."

 

I guess the Irish still need to catch up a bit on the equal rights front?

 

17 is far to strict but Ireland is Conservative due to Catholicism

 

 But seriously ....thinking its wrong people at that age want to have sex

 

As I said we acknowledge the reality of sexual activity in teenagers and young people. So we allow consensual sex from the age of 12 to 16 

[aluminiumtrioxid]

 

As I said we acknowledge the reality of sexual activity in teenagers and young people. So we allow consensual sex from the age of 12 to 16 

 

 

Umm... 12?

[Malcador]

Curious, but I suspect googling 'South African age of consent' for more info will get me on a watch list.

[Elerond]

Age of consent in South Africa  is 16.

 

People under 16 but over 12 if their age difference is less than 2 years can have sex with each other without getting charge for statutory rape.

 

People under 12 are strictly of limit of any sexual activity even such extent that masturbation would be illegal if it wasn't fact that people under 12 can't be charged for crime. So main effect is that 12-14 year olds can't have sex with people under 12 even if age difference is less than 2 years.

 

I Googled this information, so I probably will not be here anymore in tomorrow :(

[Orogun01]

Age of consent in South Africa  is 16.

 

People under 16 but over 12 if their age difference is less than 2 years can have sex with each other without getting charge for statutory rape.

 

People under 12 are strictly of limit of any sexual activity even such extent that masturbation would be illegal if it wasn't fact that people under 12 can't be charged for crime. So main effect is that 12-14 year olds can't have sex with people under 12 even if age difference is less than 2 years.

 

I Googled this information, so I probably will not be here anymore in tomorrow :(

Sounds like its the same as Cuba.

[BruceVC]

Age of consent in South Africa  is 16.

 

People under 16 but over 12 if their age difference is less than 2 years can have sex with each other without getting charge for statutory rape.

 

People under 12 are strictly of limit of any sexual activity even such extent that masturbation would be illegal if it wasn't fact that people under 12 can't be charged for crime. So main effect is that 12-14 year olds can't have sex with people under 12 even if age difference is less than 2 years.

 

I Googled this information, so I probably will not be here anymore in tomorrow :(

Yes this is basically correct

 

In SA it is legal for people to have sex from the age of 12-16 with each other

 

But you can't be 17 and have sex with someone who is 12, then its statutory rape

[Darkpriest]

And 17 with 15?