Jump to content

Recommended Posts

N5fYSjj.png

  • Like 4

The words freedom and liberty, are diminishing the true meaning of the abstract concept they try to explain. The true nature of freedom is such, that the human mind is unable to comprehend it, so we make a cage and name it freedom in order to give a tangible meaning to what we dont understand, just as our ancestors made gods like Thor or Zeus to explain thunder.

 

-Teknoman2-

What? You thought it was a quote from some well known wise guy from the past?

 

Stupidity leads to willful ignorance - willful ignorance leads to hope - hope leads to sex - and that is how a new generation of fools is born!


We are hardcore role players... When we go to bed with a girl, we roll a D20 to see if we hit the target and a D6 to see how much penetration damage we did.

 

Modern democracy is: the sheep voting for which dog will be the shepherd's right hand.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Or just two terrified neighbors.

 

I like the new minigun though; and it's good that the PA troopers stand a head taller in the armor this time.

minigun_zpsnv34waz5.jpg

Edited by Gizmo
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, too lazy to jump back in time and search for that interview.

 

If you mean source for that new classic mode thingy, it's from that reddit rumor post.

 

If you can't source it, don't ****ing say it. Obviously just your usual negativity spreading BS. Again.

Swedes, go to: Spel2, for the latest game reviews in swedish!

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Sorry, too lazy to jump back in time and search for that interview.

 

If you mean source for that new classic mode thingy, it's from that reddit rumor post.

 

If you can't source it, don't ****ing say it. Obviously just your usual negativity spreading BS. Again.

 

 

Doubting mr. Lexx  knoweldge of Fallouts is ... unwise

I'm the enemy, 'cause I like to think, I like to read. I'm into freedom of speech, and freedom of choice. I'm the kinda guy that likes to sit in a greasy spoon and wonder, "Gee, should I have the T-bone steak or the jumbo rack of barbecue ribs with the side-order of gravy fries?" I want high cholesterol! I wanna eat bacon, and butter, and buckets of cheese, okay?! I wanna smoke a Cuban cigar the size of Cincinnati in the non-smoking section! I wanna run naked through the street, with green Jell-O all over my body, reading Playboy magazine. Why? Because I suddenly may feel the need to, okay, pal? I've SEEN the future. Do you know what it is? It's a 47-year-old virgin sitting around in his beige pajamas, drinking a banana-broccoli shake, singing "I'm an Oscar Meyer Wiene"

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Reddit rumor is bull****. There are a lot of holes with it and Kotaku did a good job explaining what they are: http://kotaku.com/latest-popular-fallout-4-rumor-sure-seems-like-bs-1709009561 (plus, it doesn't hurt that they actually know what their own reporting is based on so they can debunk the "IT'S ME, AUSTIN! I WAS THE ONE THAT LEAKED THE CASTING CALLS" spiel from the Reddit "leaker")

 

Otherwise, wouldn't be happy with a voiced protagonist, but I'm happy that Bethesda abandoned the overbearing green tint of Fallout 3 and seems to be taking a stab at doing their own thing with the franchise in terms of setting. We'll get a much better look at the game at E3 so I'm sure there'll be more to discuss then.

 

While I think that Kotaku's right and the SarahReed post is phoney, their reasoning is wrong.  SarahReed doesn't claim she gave the material to Kotaku, she claims she accidently leaked it and it ended up in the hands of Kotaku.  So Kotaku saying "Nuh-uh, we didn't get it from SarahReed!" doesn't prove anything as she didn't claim she gave it to them, only that it was her leak that allowed them to get it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

frankly, they finally got the PA right this time

 

it finally looks like the old PA concept, bulky and terrifying not skinny and ugly as ass like the enclave APA from FO3 And NV

 

also

 

 

 

HD trailer this time, Youtube compressed the entire video in hd

Link to post
Share on other sites

While I think that Kotaku's right and the SarahReed post is phoney, their reasoning is wrong.  SarahReed doesn't claim she gave the material to Kotaku, she claims she accidently leaked it and it ended up in the hands of Kotaku.  So Kotaku saying "Nuh-uh, we didn't get it from SarahReed!" doesn't prove anything as she didn't claim she gave it to them, only that it was her leak that allowed them to get it.

I'm fairly sure they have a good grasp of who gave it to them and how it reached their hands, though obviously they can't go into the specifics because they have to protect their sources.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

While I think that Kotaku's right and the SarahReed post is phoney, their reasoning is wrong.  SarahReed doesn't claim she gave the material to Kotaku, she claims she accidently leaked it and it ended up in the hands of Kotaku.  So Kotaku saying "Nuh-uh, we didn't get it from SarahReed!" doesn't prove anything as she didn't claim she gave it to them, only that it was her leak that allowed them to get it.

I'm fairly sure they have a good grasp of who gave it to them and how it reached their hands, though obviously they can't go into the specifics because they have to protect their sources.

 

 

And that may be true; my guess since the leak was casting call sheets the most likely source for the leak was from someone connected with voice actors/talent agents. 

 

But all I'm saying is that what Kotaku offers as proof that the SarahReed post isn't how they got the material is the statement "Those documents did not come from anyone at Bethesda Game Studios."

 

One, at some point the documents DID have to come from Bethesda Game Studios or else they wouldn't have any bearing on Fallout 4. What they mean is that they weren't given the material by someone directly at Bethesda Game Studios.  Two, the SarahReed post never claims she gave them to Kotaku - "I leaked some of the first Fallout 4 info by accident, and it ended up in the hands of Kotaku. Oops."

 

In other words, were the SarahReed post true - lets say she accidentally sent the casting call sheet to someone who wasn't bound by a business contract or a NDA while trying to email to a talent agency and that person gave it to Kotaku - then technically both her and Kotaku's statements would be true.  So Kotaku's claim doesn't refute hers (although I'd argue Kotaku is probably more reliable as a claimant than an anonymous person on Reddit).

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Sorry, too lazy to jump back in time and search for that interview.

 

If you mean source for that new classic mode thingy, it's from that reddit rumor post.

 

If you can't source it, don't ****ing say it. Obviously just your usual negativity spreading BS. Again.

 

 

Wish I could google the video it was said in, but after so many years it's kinda hard and I don't feel motivated to wade through all the old Fallout 3 news and check every damn video just to prove it... Instead, though, I found a quote of a follow-up interview which clarified the issue.

 

 

https://fallout3.wordpress.com/2008/03/14/fallout-3-first-and-third-person/

Sorry for the confusion. Let me clarify that a bit.

 

I meant, in general, the game is fully playable in third person. You can run around, adventure, get into combat (“run and gun”) etc. all in third person, and the camera was designed to accommodate that kind of gameplay, unlike the third-person camera in Oblivion, which was more of a “vanity mode.”

 

You can zoom the camera back pretty far in third-person, but there comes a point where it becomes less and less effective the farther back you pull the camera, just because you’re so damn small and it’s hard to gauge where the crosshair is at that point. So yeah, you can use third-person for combat, but the game wasn’t really designed to be played with the camera pulled ALL the way back, isometric style. That’s more for fun, and to survey the scene. It’s really no different than any game that lets you zoom a third-person camera back.

Edited by Lexx
  • Like 1

"only when you no-life you can exist forever, because what does not live cannot die."

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why can't I have the small pleasure of looking at a female musculus maximus in the run cycle in 3rd person mode. Is that too much to ask. 

You are rarely invested in a fully voiced protagonist anyway and you run the risk of getting it wrong. Not to mention that character creation is out the window. 

  • Like 2

Na na  na na  na na  ...

greg358 from Darksouls 3 PVP is a CHEATER.

That is all.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm with Gorgon. I've played these games with both male & female PCs and if I'm going to spend 100+ hours looking at a characters rear end in 3rd person view there is no question which gender I'd prefer to look at.

Get off my lawn!

Link to post
Share on other sites

problem is: you're not supposed to (or, rather, shouldn't) play Fallout in third-person  :p

Let's Play The Temple of Elemental Evil (Complete)
Let's Play Neverwinter Nights and Hordes of the Underdark

Let's Play Baldur's Gate II: Shadows of Amn

I was struggling to understand ths until I noticed you are from Finland. And having been educated solely by mkreku in this respect I am convinced that Finland essentially IS the wh40k universe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

problem is: you're not supposed to (or, rather, shouldn't) play Fallout in third-person  :p

screw that, i would even play it as platform

 

also, im old enough to say that the same bitching with fallout 3 and NV is the same bitching that everyone did with Fo2 and FoT, and i still hate fallout 2 main storyline

 

it looked like someone named richardson, decided to took out one Commander Cobra's rejected plans to see if it works

Link to post
Share on other sites

problem is: you're not supposed to (or, rather, shouldn't) play Fallout in third-person  :p

 

You are right, you should only play Fallout from bird eye view in world that is portrayed by using trimetric projection.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

What, why. Why would anyone play in first person once they found out that there is a scroll out function. 

b'cuz third-person in Bethesda's games is awful (mostly due to crappy models and animation). and because first-person is more "immersive"  :rolleyes:

Let's Play The Temple of Elemental Evil (Complete)
Let's Play Neverwinter Nights and Hordes of the Underdark

Let's Play Baldur's Gate II: Shadows of Amn

I was struggling to understand ths until I noticed you are from Finland. And having been educated solely by mkreku in this respect I am convinced that Finland essentially IS the wh40k universe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even if quite a few people reacted poorly to the android questline in Fallout 3, I find the idea of the remnants of MIT still kicking around in the post-apoc interesting.

 

If Obsidian makes another West-coast Fallout game, they should respond with implementing the remnants of Caltech in it, with a few references to the pranks they'd pull on MIT in there.

Quote
"Turned wrong way round, the relentless unforeseen was what we schoolchildren studied as 'History,' harmless history, where everything unexpected in its own time is chronicled on the page as inevitable. The terror of the unforeseen is what the science of history hides, turning a disaster into an epic.”

 

-Philip Roth, The Plot Against America

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...