Jump to content

Which kind of UI would you like?  

434 members have voted

  1. 1. Which visual style do you prefer?

    • Something with a solid feeling, like Baldur's Gate
      322
    • Thin and wiry, like NWN
      112
  2. 2. Is the ability to have multiple UI windows on screen important to you?

    • Yes
      182
    • No
      252
  3. 3. Do you want a mini- map in the same style as most modern RPGs?

    • Yes
      209
    • No
      225


Recommended Posts

Posted

With multiple windows visible at once, the main use I can see is that it might be nice to have two inventories open at once.

Otherwise I'm not sure it has much point.

 

But the minimap has no place in a top-down isometric-ish game with a panning camera. Press M for map and see the map. Minimap has absolutely no place. And there should absolutely not be compasses pointing out where to go for your quests and such.

 

Otherwise, I like the BG style UI, because it has thematic flavor. I don't really care if it's bulky or not that way, but please keep it thematic.

 

Agree with this, no need for a minimap highlighting everything and BG UI was nice, I'd like one similar but based on the style of world in Eternity.

Posted

I don't know the thing I liked about BG compared to NWN was being able to click the Magic button and having all of my spells available to me. Unlike NWN we only had a task bar that needed to be shared with potions, main weapons, skills, and magic making it quite the hassle to organize everything... and the Shift and Ctrl options usually meant I would forget about my less used spells

Posted

I'd like something closer to the DA:O style of UI myself (but definitely NOT like the generic DA2 one). A mix of DA:O and Baldur's Gate 2 would be nice.

image-163149-full.jpg?1348680770image-163154-full.jpg?1348681100
15327.jpg

Posted

One of the worst things about the NWN series was its UI. It felt like I was in a jewelry shop playing with cheap board-game miniatures on the countertop.

 

I do think minimaps are great, as long as they aren't full of huge markers and flashing lights telling you where to go. Just a mini-map, literally.

  • Like 2
Posted

I totally think mini-maps make sense in an FPS game or a close in 3rd person game, but how exactly do people envision a mini-map implementation in a game that uses a high oblique camera angle ... the screen will practically be a mini-map in and of itself won't it?

Posted (edited)

I totally think mini-maps make sense in an FPS game or a close in 3rd person game, but how exactly do people envision a mini-map implementation in a game that uses a high oblique camera angle ... the screen will practically be a mini-map in and of itself won't it?

like every single RTS game ever I would think. or league of legends. Very different game, but pretty much the same camera.

34984_medium.jpg

 

It would fit pretty easily into either bottom corner of the icewind dale ui for example.

icewind.jpg

Edited by ogrezilla
Posted

You missed a poll option: zero UI at all. That is, no borders, no icons, nothing but the game screen. Things pop up only when you want them to after you press a key or move the mouse to the bottom, something like that.

  • Like 2
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I'd like something solid like the BG/IWD series. I don't care about the ability to have multiple UI windows open simultaneously, nor do I want a minimap that can't be completely turned off. If you can do that though, then I won't mind one.

  • Like 1

Exile in Torment

 

QblGc0a.png

Posted

I like the solid looking UI myself, but I also appreciated a game like Lionheart allowing you to turn off the UI (which in its case was kinda funky but cool too).

 

But I'll live with whatever as long as its a useable UI - function over form.

I cannot - yet I must. How do you calculate that? At what point on the graph do "must" and "cannot" meet? Yet I must - but I cannot! ~ Ro-Man

Posted

In cRPGs, I prefer a more solid UI, whereas in action-RPGs I prefer something much more minimal.

 

I hope they can come up with something a bit nicer looking than the BG UI though.

Posted (edited)

I'm ok with an UI similar to the IWD2's one, better if it come with multiple UI windows, such as those that were in NWN2 (es: the character window).

 

What I really hope for P.E. is a quick-cast window! The one in NWN2 was extremely practical!

 

A mix of both the UI, in my opinion, should be very good.

 

6NQ76.jpg

IpLln.jpg

Edited by Sick
LXIfI.jpg

Posted

Bah, who needs graphics. The UI of text games back in the 80s were to the point and easy to use. Here's the one from "Neverending Story":

Here are the most commonly used words to get you started.

 

Look (or L)

To look around. This redisplays the description of the current location (it is

done automatically if you move to a new location).

North (or N)

North East (or NE)

East (E)

South East (or SE)

South (or S)

South West (or SW)

West (or W)

North West (or NW)

These are movement verbs that are used most often. You can type just the

direction or place the word "Go" in front (it makes no difference). Of course

the program will only let you move in a specified direction if it is possible.

Get/Drop

For picking up or dropping an object.

Inventory

This instruction displays in text format a list of the objects that you are

carrying (You can also reference this on the objects illustration display).

 

;)

*** "The words of someone who feels ever more the ent among saplings when playing CRPGs" ***

 

Posted

Honestly I think something similar to DA:O would work best here, although I thought NWN2 was fine as well. BG UI by today's standards is poor.

 

I should be able to open and close multiple UI windows at will, rather than have some UI impacting my view of the field at all times.

cylon_basestar_eye.gif
Posted

Bah, who needs graphics. The UI of text games back in the 80s were to the point and easy to use.

 

It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.

 

> what is a grue?

 

The grue is a sinister, lurking presence in the dark places of the earth. Its favorite diet is adventurers, but its insatiable appetite is tempered by its fear of light. No grue has ever been seen by the light of day, and few have survived its fearsome jaws to tell the tale.

 

> frotz grue

 

There's a flash of light nearby, and you glimpse a horrible, multi-fanged creature, a sheer look of terror on its face. It charges away, gurgling in agony, tearing at its glowing fur.

I cannot - yet I must. How do you calculate that? At what point on the graph do "must" and "cannot" meet? Yet I must - but I cannot! ~ Ro-Man

Posted

In my opinion IWD 2 aside from being the most beautiful Infinity Engine game ever released,it also had the best UI too.

It was informative,practical and visually appealing at the same time.The different vibrant spell colors of the different

schools of magic was great.A very good piece of design overall.I hope we will see something very similar in Project Eternity.

Posted

Whatever UI they're using, the most important thing to me is READABILITY.

 

I hope:

1. Fonts can be changed - in case they decide to use some crazy artistic font that's bare unreadable.

 

2. Size of the fonts can be changed - Err... it's no fun to look at a big ass screen with tiny fonts. I don't like squinting and I'm not a young'un anymore.

 

3. Please make sure the dialog window / codex / inventory screen can be ADJUSTED to make full use of our big screens. I'd like to see all of the details in glorious size.

 

Please, pretty please ... :bow:

Posted

the DA:O and NWN UIs have a completely different feel to the IE games. The IE games had perfectly good UI's so I hope those are emulated, with the possible inclusion of a minimap, but I'm really on the fence about that. I really like the intricacy of the IWD2 interface with it's Greek motif.

 

The one thing that's really important is a resize-able dialogue window. I really want the ability to maximise that when necessary (and read back previous choices) and minimize it in combat (to 1 or 2 lines).

They think my style strange,

I think they all the same.

Posted

I've never 'liked' any UI for any game I've ever played and I always download a UI mod. So it doesn't really matter to me what the UI is like cause there's a 99% probability that I'll be downloading a separate UI mod for the game (assuming one is available). If I 'had' to choose, I prefer a UI that is crisp, clear, and doesn't have useless information/buttons blocking parts of the screen. I'd love a full customization UI but, I don't foresee that happening.

Obsidian ‏@Obsidian Current PayPal status: $140,000. 2,200 backers

 

"Hmm so last Paypal information was 140,000 putting us at 4,126,929. We did well over and beyond 4 million, and still have an old backer number from Paypal. 76,186 backers. It's very possible that we have over 75,000 backers if I had new Paypal information. Which means we may have 15 Mega dungeon levels, and we already are going to have an amazing game + cats (I swear I will go stir crazy if Adam doesn't own up to the cats thing :p)."

 

Switching to Paypal means that more of your money will go towards Project Eternity. (The more you know.)

Paypal charges .30 cents per transaction and 2.2% for anything over 100,000 per month for U.S currency. Other currency is different, ranging from anywhere between 2.2-4.9%.

Kick Starter is a fixed 5% charge at the end.

Posted

If they go with the IE BG style UI and include a minimap the game screen is going to be crowded. Of course the DAO and NWN UI's have a different feel, because they were designed for those games.

 

The layout though could be applied to any game and be fine. Imagine DAO layout done with PE textures and graphics etc, the portraits don't have to be circles, they don't even have to be in the upper left etc. Just that the layout itself leaves more of the screen for viewing the gameplay.

Posted

The nice thing with the UI in the BG games was that it didn't intrude on the actual view of gameplay. You had the border around the gameplay window that had all your information and no minimaps or portraits obfuscating the actual gameplay.

 

This is an excellent point. Since every screen is going to be gorgeous prerendered graphics, I would like a UI that "frames" that rather than "intrude". Something like Icewind Dale's quickslots and portraits laid out on one bar but without the text log and rest of the UI taking up too space perhaps?

Posted

I hope that the UI will be visually pleasing, with little details here and there, some ornamentation (something akin to the Diablo I health and mana pools) etc. Functional doesn't have to necessarily mean minimalistic.

For an instance, I liked the interface in The Temple of the Elemental Evil, but it felt disconnected to me, due to its rather modern look.

Posted

I'm yet another one who really liked the DA:O UI. Visually it fitted well with the setting, while not getting in the way of the gameplay.

Posted (edited)

A minimap in an isometric RPG? Are you kidding me? Who needs that? Just have a map, that is accessible with one click.

 

Btw: Instead of minimaps you should have ingamedescriptions if there are places, that aren't easily navigated. For example nonamenpcs could have the dialogueoption "Where can I find...". (See Gothic 2 for example).That is a much more immersive solution and it's really bad if it is skipped in favor of an unimmersive minimap that is an unneccesary UI element.

Edited by harhar!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...