Amentep Posted February 28, 2008 Posted February 28, 2008 Justice League - The New Frontier . Going into this flick I was a little afraid after seeing quite a few lackluster animated comic movies. But I found this to be a decent take on the Silver Age of DC superheroes. Worth a rental, at least compared in relation to its competition. Have you read the stories it was based on? The last movie I saw was The Signal, a low budget horror film about a broadcast through TV/radio and phones that causes people to kill. Its "okay" at best; the movie was divided by three writer-directors into three different sections, so the whole is rather uneven. I thought the opening was weak with some very poor drama and dialogue, then picked up only to descend into people acting really stupid. The second part is the best of the three, and also the darkly funniest. But it also contains a number of "why are these people acting that stupid" moments. The third is mostly a chase/race story so there's little to it and the immediate end is somewhat let down by a lack of budget and some confusing psychology, but manages to be kinda okay. Couldn't say I could really recommend the film though. I cannot - yet I must. How do you calculate that? At what point on the graph do "must" and "cannot" meet? Yet I must - but I cannot! ~ Ro-Man
Gfted1 Posted February 28, 2008 Posted February 28, 2008 Justice League - The New Frontier . Going into this flick I was a little afraid after seeing quite a few lackluster animated comic movies. But I found this to be a decent take on the Silver Age of DC superheroes. Worth a rental, at least compared in relation to its competition. Ive been meaning to get that. I really like the animation/way the characters are drawn in that series. It was a sad day for me when they cancelled the regular Saturday series. "I'm your biggest fan, Ill follow you until you love me, Papa"
Pidesco Posted February 28, 2008 Posted February 28, 2008 Shoot em up. I had heard this movie was good from someone who only a few days ago I thought I could trust. I wasn't too impressed. I'm a mild fan of Clive Owen and he did a fine job but I suppose this movie just wasn't for me. I'm not a huge fan of over the top action and this was no short of being ridiculous but even so there were other problems. They tried to introduce backgrounds of the characters in horribly action cliche ways that were entirely retarded and unwarranted. I can understand that this movie was a parody of action movies but it just wasn't funny or all that awesome. Blood splatter and crazy gun shot wounds were cool but for the most part it was just all over the place and not awesome. 6.5/10 - Needed more bewbies and less trying to satirize action movies. That's like saying Apocalypse Now needed less war, or Love Story needed less love, or Aliens needed fewer aliens. "My hovercraft is full of eels!" - Hungarian tourist I am Dan Quayle of the Romans. I want to tattoo a map of the Netherlands on my nether lands. Heja Sverige!! Everyone should cuffawkle more. The wrench is your friend.
astr0creep Posted February 29, 2008 Posted February 29, 2008 No Country for Old Men Visuals and acting are very, very nice. The unravelling of the story was like listening to an anectdote heard in a coffee shop on a busy morning. Slow, long and irrelevant. I didn't really care what happened. The pacing was ok for the film itself but it was too slow for my taste. I'm still wondering what the use of TLJ's character is for. Josh Brolin's performance was more of a surprise to me and I found his work in this better then Bardem's, who just stares blankly at things and uses a deep, barely audible voice. Also, I couldn't figure out how a man of Moss' obvious intelligence would go back to the scene of a drug deal gone bad to bring water to a dying survivor, after many hours. Why did he go back after such a long period of time? Guilt? Pff. 7/10 http://entertainmentandbeyond.blogspot.com/
theslug Posted March 2, 2008 Posted March 2, 2008 American Gangster. This is kind of a tough one. It was an above average movie but it had a lot of potential in my opinion and it only ended up being sup par. The movie was long as hell and was a little boring a few times, pacing was well done but I mean it was like 3 hours, so not much you can do about that. I would have liked if they added a bit more "action/suspense" but the investigation portion of the movie was fine I suppose just could have been a bit more lively. The story itself was interesting and fresh considering there hasn't been a gangster movie in quite a while, the acting was solid, and there honestly was no major flaws besides the length of the movie. As a whole the movie doesn't come close to the caliber of movie like Casino, but thats kind of unfair since Casino is like an amazing movie. Way better than any of that other trash the majority of stupid meat headed meat faces that walk the streets saying Scarface, Godfather, etc is the best. But enough about that, I give you the much anticipated score. 8.1/10 - Towards the end things got pretty cool and the music in the film was nice. If they would have shaved off like 30 minutes, amped up the action and STYLE of the film this could have been a real gem. Just pulls out a -B. There was a time when I questioned the ability for the schizoid to ever experience genuine happiness, at the very least for a prolonged segment of time. I am no closer to finding the answer, however, it has become apparent that contentment is certainly a realizable goal. I find these results to be adequate, if not pleasing. Unfortunately, connection is another subject entirely. When one has sufficiently examined the mind and their emotional constructs, connection can be easily imitated. More data must be gleaned and further collated before a sufficient judgment can be reached.
Meshugger Posted March 2, 2008 Posted March 2, 2008 (edited) No Country for Old Men Visuals and acting are very, very nice. The unravelling of the story was like listening to an anectdote heard in a coffee shop on a busy morning. Slow, long and irrelevant. I didn't really care what happened. The pacing was ok for the film itself but it was too slow for my taste. I'm still wondering what the use of TLJ's character is for. Josh Brolin's performance was more of a surprise to me and I found his work in this better then Bardem's, who just stares blankly at things and uses a deep, barely audible voice. Also, I couldn't figure out how a man of Moss' obvious intelligence would go back to the scene of a drug deal gone bad to bring water to a dying survivor, after many hours. Why did he go back after such a long period of time? Guilt? Pff. 7/10 As for TLJ's character, he is the main character. He doesn't understand the murders, and he simply refuses to believe that someone like Chigurh would be capable of that kind of atrocities. Watch his ending speech again, where one will understand on why "There is no country for old men". As for Moss going back, it was a flash of doing the right thing. Which is partly the point of the movie, look for everytime someone does a good thing, and how it messes things up for them. Chigurh however, is consequent throughout the movie, and look what happens to him Edited March 2, 2008 by Meshugger "Some men see things as they are and say why?""I dream things that never were and say why not?"- George Bernard Shaw"Hope in reality is the worst of all evils because it prolongs the torments of man."- Friedrich Nietzsche "The amount of energy necessary to refute bull**** is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it." - Some guy
Gorth Posted March 2, 2008 Posted March 2, 2008 Bought a couple of movies when I went into the local mall yesterday. Resident Evil 2 & 3, Battlestar Galactica Season 3 and A Knights Tale. Trying to decide which one is going to be the 'Movies you have seen lately' “He who joyfully marches to music in rank and file has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would surely suffice.” - Albert Einstein
LadyCrimson Posted March 3, 2008 Posted March 3, 2008 Sicko. No one should confuse Michael Moore with being a serious documentary filmmaker, but I do find his movies entertaining opinion-propaganda. This one falls apart towards the end (becomes boring & overly conceited even for Moore) but up to that point it's watchable, gave me some laughs, and occasionally made me nod in agreement with the basic point that "health care system in America is bogus." “Things are as they are. Looking out into the universe at night, we make no comparisons between right and wrong stars, nor between well and badly arranged constellations.” – Alan Watts
astr0creep Posted March 4, 2008 Posted March 4, 2008 Sicko. No one should confuse Michael Moore with being a serious documentary filmmaker, but I do find his movies entertaining opinion-propaganda. This one falls apart towards the end (becomes boring & overly conceited even for Moore) but up to that point it's watchable, gave me some laughs, and occasionally made me nod in agreement with the basic point that "health care system in America is bogus." I found Sicko to be more about Health Insurance than Healthcare. He bashes on insurance companies a lot more than the governement. Until the last "chapter" where he mixes up his causes with the war in Irak. He lost the focus of his film at that point and my interest as well. http://entertainmentandbeyond.blogspot.com/
Pidesco Posted March 4, 2008 Posted March 4, 2008 There Will Be Blood Saw it yesterday, and it was good if a bit uneven. I particularly liked the confrontations between Eli and Daniel. No Country for Old Men Saw it today, and it was quite awesome. I'll have to see it a second time to try and figure out where the Coens were going with it. "My hovercraft is full of eels!" - Hungarian tourist I am Dan Quayle of the Romans. I want to tattoo a map of the Netherlands on my nether lands. Heja Sverige!! Everyone should cuffawkle more. The wrench is your friend.
walkerguy Posted March 5, 2008 Posted March 5, 2008 the lord of the rings - all exteneded version Twitter | @Insevin
Shryke Posted March 5, 2008 Posted March 5, 2008 the lord of the rings - all exteneded version extended version? so another 2 hours of walking then? don't get me wrong, i liked the movies (the first time i watched them) trying to sit through them again was a bit of a yawn-fest though last movie i watched was Bubba Ho Tep (on the advice of my brother) Bruce Campbell as Elvis... when your mind works against you - fight back with substance abuse!
astr0creep Posted March 5, 2008 Posted March 5, 2008 the lord of the rings - all exteneded version extended version? so another 2 hours of walking then? don't get me wrong, i liked the movies (the first time i watched them) trying to sit through them again was a bit of a yawn-fest though last movie i watched was Bubba Ho Tep (on the advice of my brother) Bruce Campbell as Elvis... I absolutely loathed Bubba Ho Tep. I love Bruce Campbell like any other geek but this was just total crap, even for a B-movie type thing. On the other hand, I went to see LotR:FotR 15 times in theaters... http://entertainmentandbeyond.blogspot.com/
walkerguy Posted March 5, 2008 Posted March 5, 2008 the lord of the rings - all exteneded version extended version? so another 2 hours of walking then? don't get me wrong, i liked the movies (the first time i watched them) trying to sit through them again was a bit of a yawn-fest though It was very long but makes normal cut seem like the biggest pile of poo* in the world. Extra plots, dialouge, more complete. Sort of like the TSL restoration project. Trust me. Twitter | @Insevin
Shryke Posted March 5, 2008 Posted March 5, 2008 yeah it certainly wasn't the greatest i'm not trusting my brother's movie taste ever again when your mind works against you - fight back with substance abuse!
Hurlshort Posted March 5, 2008 Posted March 5, 2008 Eh, I thought a wheelchair bound Elvis and JFK versus a mummy was pretty interesting. You have to go in expecting it's going to be a bad B movie, really.
Amentep Posted March 5, 2008 Posted March 5, 2008 (edited) Yeah I loved Bubba-Ho-Tep. Mind you, as you might be able to guess, I'm a sucker for mummy movies. Too bad about the sequel, Bubba Nosferatu not getting made. >_ Edited March 5, 2008 by Amentep I cannot - yet I must. How do you calculate that? At what point on the graph do "must" and "cannot" meet? Yet I must - but I cannot! ~ Ro-Man
kirottu Posted March 5, 2008 Posted March 5, 2008 I liked Bubba-Ho-Tep too. [Elvis begins reading an incantation against an unconscious Bubba Ho-Tep from JFK's "Book of Souls"] Elvis: "You nasty thing from beyond the dead, no matter what you think or do, good things will never come to you. And if evil is your black design, you can bet the goodness of the Light Ones..." [begins to slow the recitation from disbelief] Elvis: "... will kick your bad behind"? [muttering to himself] Elvis: For chrissake! [to the heavens] Elvis: That's it? That's the chant against evil from the "Book of Souls"? Oh yeah, right, boss. And what kind of decoder ring comes with that, man? ****, it don't even rhyme well! Bubba Ho-Tep: [regains consciousness, rises, and speaks in ancient Egyptian] Eat the dog **** of Anubis, you ass-wipe! This post is not to be enjoyed, discussed, or referenced on company time.
Tale Posted March 5, 2008 Posted March 5, 2008 (edited) the lord of the rings - all exteneded version extended version? so another 2 hours of walking then? don't get me wrong, i liked the movies (the first time i watched them) trying to sit through them again was a bit of a yawn-fest though last movie i watched was Bubba Ho Tep (on the advice of my brother) Bruce Campbell as Elvis... How can someone not like The Lord of the Rings trilogy? I'm dying for the hi-def extended edition releases. Edited March 5, 2008 by Tale "Show me a man who "plays fair" and I'll show you a very talented cheater."
LadyCrimson Posted March 6, 2008 Posted March 6, 2008 I love Bruce Campbell like any other geek but this was just total crap, even for a B-movie type thing. I wouldn't say it was total crap, but I do mostly agree w/the sentiment It had some comic/amusing moments - if Bruce is in the movie, it's bound to - but overall it was kind of a snooze-fest. It was very long but makes normal cut seem like the biggest pile of poo* in the world. Extra plots, dialouge, more complete. I can't watch the theater versions at all anymore for that reason. Extended adds more depth, which was somewhat lacking before. Not that it's super-deep even in the extended, but .... yeah, y'all know what I mean. But after the first time, I haven't been able to sit through all 3 extended without fast-forwarding through a lot of scenes. The more I came to memorize the films, the more scenes there are that I realize I don't find all that entertaining on repeated viewings. And the last movie I saw was Hoosiers. One of those old movies I hadn't seen a long long time, and one of the few "sports" movies that I actually like. “Things are as they are. Looking out into the universe at night, we make no comparisons between right and wrong stars, nor between well and badly arranged constellations.” – Alan Watts
Guard Dog Posted March 6, 2008 Posted March 6, 2008 Sort of like the TSL restoration project. Trust me. You might want to reserve judgement on that one. The LOTR movies actually got finished. I kid. "While it is true you learn with age, the down side is what you often learn is what a damn fool you were before" Thomas Sowell
Oerwinde Posted March 6, 2008 Posted March 6, 2008 Last movie I saw was Justice League: The New Frontier. Probably the best DC animated film, and right up there with Iron Man for best animated comic movie. The area between the balls and the butt is a hotbed of terrorist activity.
DSLuke Posted March 7, 2008 Posted March 7, 2008 Sleuth Really low budget film, all the shots were inside a house. Didn't like the story. Plus all you ever see is 2 actors. And by the light of the moon He prays for their beauty not doom
Walsingham Posted March 8, 2008 Posted March 8, 2008 Diary of the Dead. 1. After Cloverfield precisely which fething genius thought handheld footage would work? 2. Call me old fashioned. 3. Just call me old fashioned. 4. Also explain what the point is of a film which does absolutely nothing new? 5. Please also explain the purpose of protagonists who are so ball-twistingly annoying you actually want them to die? Why can't we have believable and likeable characters? "It wasn't lies. It was just... bull****"." -Elwood Blues tarna's dead; processing... complete. Disappointed by Universe. RIP Hades/Sand/etc. Here's hoping your next alt has a harp.
Gorth Posted March 8, 2008 Posted March 8, 2008 1. After Cloverfield precisely which fething genius thought handheld footage would work?2. Call me old fashioned. 3. Just call me old fashioned. 4. Also explain what the point is of a film which does absolutely nothing new? 5. Please also explain the purpose of protagonists who are so ball-twistingly annoying you actually want them to die? Why can't we have believable and likeable characters? 1. People on a low budget and artsy amateurs (and the idea hasn't reached Boll yet, he probably will when it does). 2. You are old fashioned. 3. You are old fashioned. 4. You just described 95% of the movie industry (which btw. is whining about people not watching their "new" releases) 5. Whats wrong with Doctor Zhivago? Recently seen: A boy and his dog. “He who joyfully marches to music in rank and file has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would surely suffice.” - Albert Einstein
Recommended Posts