so let me see if ive got this right:
something that lucasarts and lucasfilm gives the okay to that you dont agree with (the basilisk thing), and thats breaking with continuity and "not okay".
something that lucasarts and lucasfilm gives the okay to that i dont agree with (beldorian the hutt, a jedi) which seems to break continuity and in your opinion thats fine.
weird how that works.
personally, i think a hutt jedi, a cloned emperor and a sith lord that is unbelievably powerful (exar kun) are more a blight on the star wars universe than the fact that kotor2 used a different design for a single war droid that, for all intents and purposes, played a part in about 1/100000 of the actual game and story.
if youre going to be anal about continuity, thats your choice. but dont use existing eu material or lucasfilms track record as proof, since theyre the ones responsible for the atrocities ive stated, including beldorian the hutt jedi, which is DIRECTLY in contradiction to everything continuity says about hutts being able to be force sensitive.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Well said Knight. Not to mention the utter lack of continuity even within the ToTJ comic books, when some Jedi used protosabers and others lightsabers.
SW and continuity are like polar and nonpolar: they don't mix.
Find me one comic/book, and there's probably another comic/book that violates some fact about the former.