Chippy

There's also this: "All of that and more is available in a Google search. But here’s what most of the media wouldn’t next report. First, what was with that elephant tail? Donald Jr. told me that TMZ didn’t report that Africans traditionally cut off the tail and make bracelets from the tail hair. TMZ didn’t seem to know—again, because they didn’t do any reporting—that Africans do this as a sign of respect for the fallen animal. And they didn’t report that elephants are over-populated in the area the Trumps hunted and so need to be hunted to prevent them from further destroying their habitat. They didn’t mention that when elephants overpopulate they literally rip down the forest. They didn’t note—and any conservation group could have told them this—the result of an overpopulated elephant herd is death by starvation and disease. Nor did they did contact the Zimbabwe Parks and Wildlife Management Authority to find out that hunting is managed scientifically to benefit all species and the ecosystem. TMZ didn’t respect the African culture enough to even ask these questions". Doesn't excuse the Leopard though. Source: Forbes http://www.forbes.com/sites/frankminiter/2012/04/09/tmz-is-wrong-about-donald-trump-jr-and-safari-hunting/#39ef3383206f

They should really evidence that they are donating millions (if they arn't then they should) to endangered species, which would make this somewhat, almost, a reasonable life choice. Or they should start up another Jurassic Park.

You're right of course - that is outrageous, and it makes my blood run cold when I see wealthy million/billionaires with nothing better to do than kill wildlife. But after careful consideration I think I would still vote for Trump - as I just found out that dinosaurs and the Wooly Mammoth are actually extinct.

My mum told me I went into a boogy fit for no reason when I was 7 years old. Now I know why - I heard these guys from San Francisco to the UK :

If I was a US citizen I would take back everything in terms of support after finding out that his trophy hunting sons have killed various endangered species: It's just totally deplorable, and Hillary Clinton was right all along. - This post links to the Youtube video of Trumps sons killing a Triceratops, but for some reason it isn't showing.

Not much news on the FF7 remake - last I heard it was being split into 3 parts, and the battle system was being borked in real time...

That's interesting - I just came across this vid on Youtube of a couple being destroyed by the Canadian government (I know it's probably different in America) because they didn't agree with the gun laws implemented on owners, and let their licence expire: So the government destroyed their gunsmithing livelihood, went after their home, and were financially ruined by defending themselves in court. It just makes me think that if they ever allowed the public guns in Britain (which will never happen without massive political displacement), case studies like this would be common place - unless the government put aside its ability to tax the public - which would require an even bigger upheaval.

I suppose it depends on how the agenda is put forward - if its about "behave as we behave and say what we say, or be on the wrong side of history" then I will refuse that agenda on principle. If it's Alex Jones saying "Hey! they said Trump is the racist backed by the KKK, but here's a video of Hillary Clinton going the the funeral of the grand master/maester (whatever) of the KKK, and her husband talking about what a great influence he was on him... and by the way buy these man pills, they'll boost your performance in bed by 900%". You can still see the agenda there, but he has still brought forward facts you otherwise wouldn't know.

'Alternative media' on Youtube. Mainstream media has an agenda, and only reports on anything that goes against that agenda when it must, and then in a totally neutral manner. The alternative press might have their own opinions, but reports on highly important world news that is just considered "irrelevant" by the BBC, ITC, etc.

This does look awesome. I'm a bit of a snob when I see that a piece of entertainment has been fanmade, but this looks far superior to the ultramarines movie.

Are you allowed to make ammunition or guns under the 2nd amendment ?. Just curious - I live in Britain.

I find it hard to believe she offended you? No Trump will lose and the women of the USA will teach him his lesson in humility. For those interested in the actual perfect example of what I mean check this video, now its important to remember in life there are different types of sexists. Trump isnt the type of sexist that resents women or thinks they should be in the kitchen. No he is the type of sexist that cant handle a women telling him what to do ....watch this video to understand why many women understandably wont vote Trump I think more of political correctness as being a form of political slavery - mutual respect between people is a subtle thing that once gained can't be lost through words, banter, or what may actually be a challenge (Trump referring to the employee on her knees) between people to rise above political correctness and show that gained respect with a suitable retort. Unfortunately, I think that this way of thinking is a generational thing, gone the way of common sense, cognitive analytical thinking, and replaced by programmed behaviour and accepted predetermined attitudes.

Now go away or I shall taunt you a second time... No really...Britain is building a wall: http://www.standard.co.uk/news/world/britain-to-build-2m-great-wall-of-calais-to-keep-migrants-out-of-uk-a3338526.html See...

On a side-note; a British guy tried to assassinate Trump back in June. I'd like to apologize to all Trump supporters on behalf of the British people for the actions of that moron - you know every country has got them.

Britain to build a wall on the divide to Calais. 4m high! I wonder if Calais will start banning sales of ladders? Or milk crates - you can use them like lego you know. Wonder how it will compare to Trumps wall (American using imperial and all) and always doing everything bigger and better.

Well I'm mixed race (4 different grandparents, I'm told I look kind of Mediterranean) and have only suffered racism from three sources: dumb**** white guy's, dumb**** upper class white types, and an Arabic Muslim extremist that wanted to kill me on sight because he saw I wasn't a Arabic when he walked into my class, and decided it was improper to be taught by me. Fortunately I had two other Muslims in my class who were war veterans, and convinced him of the error of his ways. But I lived next to Indian and Black people all my life (right next to Brixton, not far from Tooting) without any issues at all. If the EU want to create a generation like me (that ar not accepted as part of any of their parent races) and think it will bring social cohesion, I personally think they are wrong - because they still have to work out where the race of SJW's came from and whether they will create children with the remaining rational people in the world. I expect the SJW's will be test-tube babies, genetically engineered with favourable personality traits and everyone else will have to get to some serious baby-making and adoption to keep up.

Do you think it is a worse state because that is what Trump is saying? Is this part of the plan to lower our debt? I live in Britain, so just going by what he said - which was pretty specific (not sure if he could lie about this stuff) but he pretty much went through army number of boots on the ground, ships, and air force ("they're flying the planes their fathers flew" i think was the sentence) and that under Obama and Hillary the cost over the past 10 years has been 6 trillion - I think estimates at 75,000 per American household. I don't know your average salary, but expect that's about 2-3 years worth. http://www.globalresearch.ca/us-wars-in-afghanistan-iraq-to-cost-6-trillion/5350789 I mean, the man is specific. I don't know what Hillary's take on this is. The last time I heard her say anything, it was about shutting down Infowars and Breitbart. Kinda makes me worry when I hear this - same crap in Britain. They are actually saying the military isn't up to scratch.

That link to the newspaper talking about Tooting is inaccurate. My family have been going to the market there for over 50 years, and knew plenty of stall owners. It's got worse, but you can still walk through there. I think the Chinese government was talking about the various other no-go zones here and there. I'm still waiting for there to be a documentary or for politicians to walk through these areas themselves.

Watching Trump on Youtube now (live in Ohio). It seems America's military and defense system is in a worse state than Britain. Obama and Hillary Clinton did a great job there. (Sarcasm)

So the Codex is reporting that Herve Caen is finally packing it in at Interplay. Last I heard from this company I think they were running a scam to Kickstart a fallout title... so is there anything left? I think the Planescape setting has been discontinued, and Interplay lost it to whatever happened to Atari, any other IP's Obsidian or InXile might be able to get?. Also; it bloody well took long enough, what have they been doing in the past 15-20 years...

See No Evil, Hear No Evil. Richard Pryor and Gene Wilder - should really be mandatory viewing for everyone on the planet. RIP.

I'll concede (having done some research) that it was inaccurate to label Sweden as I did. If Sweden was the subject of a question and study though: are migrants assaulting/raping swedish women? It seems as though providing a definitive answer is impossible. As an observer it seems that Sweden is governed by the far left, a government that sees no wrong with immigration and will punish it's native citizens severely for raising questions on immigration. In the event that judges are presented with cases of migrants raping women, they consider the rapists to be victims of their previous culture and provide lenient sentences: "In an astounding number of cases, the Swedish courts have demonstrated sympathy for the rapists. Several times the courts have acquitted suspects who have claimed that the girl wanted sex with six, seven or eight men." "A 15-year-old girl was locked up while six men of foreign extraction had sex with her. The lower court convicted the six men but the court of appeals acquitted them because no violence had occurred, and because the court determined that the girl "had not been in a defenseless position."' In fact, it seems to be a greater crime (4 years min jail) for a citizen to raise concerns on immigration. The government has refused to allow police to record the ethnicity of criminals, classifies second generation migrants as Swedish, and actively tried to prevent (as happened in Cologne, Germany) the police from telling the public what happened in Stockholm. The consensus seems to be that the far left government doesn't want to swing public opinion to the right when it comes to the next elections. When Swedish citizens voice dissent, such as policemen telling women not to go out at night, it's done in a totally PC manner. People expressing informative views are excluded from society and citizens are afraid to read their work, experts (Michael Hess) presenting informed facts to judges are dismissed as personal racist opinions, or an artists (Dan Park) freedom of expression against PC is prosecuted as a form of insanity by the court. Michael Hess discovered (before the government stopped measuring) that: Whether or not they measured by the number of convicted rapists or men suspected of rape, men of foreign extraction were represented far more than Swedes. And this greater representation of persons with a foreign background keeps increasing: 1960-1970s – 1.2 to 2.6 times as often as Swedes 1980s – 2.1 to 4.7 times as often as Swedes 1990s – 2.1 to 8.1 times as often as Swedes 2000s – 2.1 to 19.5 times as often as Swedes The reason that this concerns me is that in Britain the police refused to investigate Pakistani Muslim men who were grooming and raping over a thousand girls over a fifteen year period. They were paralysed by political correctness and afraid of being labelled racist. Consider that a moment - parents, police, social workers, lawyers, politicians and every policeman and woman from the lowest to the top ranks who were aware of this did nothing because political correctness prevented them from doing so. Now consider -from Wikipedia- that in Sweden: According to Brå, it is likely that only around 20 per cent of all rapes are being reported, which was confirmed in a 2001 study of the extent of violence against women, funded by the Government of Sweden and the Crime Victim Compensation and Support Authority. As well as: How is it, then, that in 2008, Sweden's neighbor Denmark only had 7.3 rapes per 100,000 inhabitants compared to 53.2 in Sweden? Danish legislation is not very different from Sweden's, and there is no obvious reason why Danish women should be less inclined to report rape than their Swedish counterparts. In 2011, 6,509 rapes were reported to the Swedish police -- but only 392 in Denmark. The population of Denmark is about half the size of Sweden's, so even adjusted for size, the discrepancy is significant. In Sweden, the authorities do what they can to conceal the origin of the rapists. In Denmark, the state's official statistical office, Statistics Denmark, revealed that in 2010 more than half of convicted rapists had an immigrant background. So does that mean that 53 per 100,000 inhabitants (another site said about 1 in 4 women) are victims of sexual attacks, that this figure is only 20% of the actual figure (I expect, not including the 55 'no-go' zones/156 ghetto areas as of 2006) and that as I mentioned above, not just the people in a single town of Rotherham in the UK, but EVERYONE who has a legal and moral responsibility from the government down is -country wide- doing nothing or acting in a politically correct manner because they are afraid of the consequences of being labelled racist? Because, quite honestly, that would cause me to entirely re-evaluate my perception of the entire human race. Or maybe I'm the crazy for seeing a problem and Swedish government is the future of Europe. This is what the future holds for all barbarians like me who actually knows of a girl who was a victim of the type of rape mentioned in Rotherham. Who thinks that political correctness is a system used by the far left not to facilitate law, or justice, but (either by design or ineptitude) to re-write of a persons rationality through guilt and other projected behaviours and attitudes to achieve their own agendas. So essentially I think that if you don't see a problem here, and are not prepared to query the source of the problem - then you're just laying down, grinning and bearing it. All in the name of political correctness. That's my take on it as an observer, apologies if anyone takes it the wrong way, probably won't discuss this anymore. My father is Tunisian and I spent many a youthful holiday surrounded by Arabic and Muslim culture which still facinates me today - I have nothing but great memories of teaching adult offenders (over 5000 for 5 years) of which 70% were black or from an ethnic minority and totally smashed government targets to the extent that other colleges from Europe were visiting to discuss our recipe for success (hint: it was respect), but my experience with the left has always been bad. Sources: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/5195/sweden-rape http://www.infowars.com/feminists-mute-on-muslim-rape-epidemic-sweeping-europe/ http://pamelageller.com/2014/04/sharia-sweden-new-law-criminalizes-criticism-islam.html/#sthash.6pVmJ7i5.dpu https://swedenreport.org/2014/10/29/swedish-police-55-official-no-go-zones/ http://www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/world/2014/April/Soviet-Sweden-Model-Nation-Sliding-to-Third-World http://www.d-intl.com/2014/03/29/good-bye-sweden-you-wont-get-me-for-insanity/?lang=en http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/01/13/watch-swedish-police-blame-self-censorship-not-political-cover-up-for-migrant-for-sex-mob-silence/ https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jan/13/sex-assaults-sweden-stockholm-music-festival https://www.rt.com/news/328523-swedish-police-refugee-assaults/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Park https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_in_Sweden

The way I look at it is that countries need to lay out the ground rules from the start. Germany has this open door policy (and Sweden) of total PC culture and acceptance, and then start chucking people out of the country when it hits the fan, and banning traditional dress because (I assume) of security fears. This is where I agree with Donald Trump and Nigel Farage - if this was done properly they would have set camps up in the migrants native countries that checked for valid status, made a person aware of expected changes and local laws, and then deported that person if they broke those laws or denied them access if they didn't agree. As it is in France, a man was attacked with hatchets and harpoons for taking a photo of a woman in a 'burqini'. Now I half expect that she wouldn't have been on the beech without one, and he would have been attacked for sure if she was wearing a normal costume. But they're effectively shutting the door after the horse has bolted with the ban. And people that talk about the Muslim community changing the radicals to integrate better are morons - because that's a long term change. Assuming it works. In the short term you're not going to change the mind of a person armed with a machete going into a shopping centre to kill people with: "Hey, hold on a moment while I ring up someone who can talk you out of this". This is why I question the sanity of these leaders. Germany is frightening the crap out of it's citizens by telling them to stock up on supplies for 10 days, while simultaneously creating friction with migrants with a burqa ban - knowing that this was one of the reasons France has been targetted so much because of theirs.

According to Brigitte Gabriel (great deal of respect for that lady) the coup would have been a good thing...

AFAIK Sweden is now the rape capital of Europe, and second highest the world world over. It's expected that as much as 190,000 migrants will come into Sweden this year and 160,000 last year, with 80,000 being sent home. The rape epidemic started (as in Germany) with the influx of migrants, with the governments trying to cover it up. I'd say that as far as cultural integration goes, and economic concerns are predicted, putting a question mark over Sweden is the only logical way to look at it. And can only hope for the best for the future of their country. I honestly think we're at a time in Europe where the projections of conspiracy theorists are starting to sound more reasonable than the decisions of world leaders. Germany for instance, now wants to ban the burqa. It's like they're actually trying to incite social unrest. ...further.