Boeroer

Official new Deadfire rum!

The Liquorist! The Spirits-Shifter! The Puked-over Jacket! The Soul-Sommelier! The Rummy (half Rogue, half Mummy)! The Boozed Bawler! The Blitzed Bombardier! The Hooligan! Only the Steel Carrot and the Priest of Lasagneface are the party poopers.

Blood Thirst does not do anything for reloading weapons (like Arbalest). Frenzy and Bloodlust do work. Can't remember if Bloody Slaughter is melee only or not, sorry. It may be that you can trigger Blood Storm with Thorny Roots (never tried).

But not in games?

Haha... Oh you...

And High RES + Clarity + Lone Wolf (see Sacred Immolation's self dmg getting nullified by that combo). I played a Berserker/Nalpasca the other playthrough and the wound generation through Frenzy was so powerful. I predict that Sages are going to be even more awesome than they already are.

I did execute HoF and it used melee weapon and gun. But that was some time ago and it might well be that a) this got altered or b) HoF is special since it's not the usual Full Attack animation and all I think I also had the same behavior with Flagellant's Path and Whispers of the Wind. Maybe I'll test that today when I have some minutes free time. My days are horribly jam-packed atm.

Yeah, when you're not the "real" blue orlan. Down with those impostors!

Dude! Noice!

You mean all nine are Drunken Monk? Wonder how that works as a Wizard subclass... "Fan of Rum-infused Flames!"

I would love a Firefly RPG made by Obsidian (there's already a tabletop version). But those ads are more "fallout-ish" - meaning they combine futuristic elements with the vibe of the 50's. I still like the overall vibes of those ads though. The looks, the sound, the rustles... Looks promising to me.

"Fallout of the Old Republic" would be my favorite.

I have no problems reading it. I also didn't think it was a bug. I just thought "Hm, I guess those jaunty frills don't look thaaat good...?" while frantically searching the corresponding checkbox. Yeah... I'm so sorry Josh!

MIG (besides INT) is a great stat for DoTs.

...combine with Frenzy, Bloodlust and Blood Thirst I hope.

Count me in!

https://forums.obsidian.net/topic/106894-countdown-shenanigans-on-obsidians-homepage/ Right beneath this one.

Nope

Hello. Unfortunately Obsidian Entertainment did not develop the console version of PoE but Paradox did on its own. Hence the people here might not be able to help you. You can find the technical support forum for PoE for consoles on Paradox's website: https://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/index.php?forums/pillars-of-eternity-bug-reports.990/ Hope this helps!

If it's a full attack that works with melee and ranged weapons then the char will execute the full attack at melee range with both weapons. At least last time I tried. Might have changed.

I think first of all there are plenty of weapon proficiency points to use (if you are not a Devoted). Secondly weapon proficiencies don't do much besides adding a modal that is not very impactful in most cases anyway. A case where you want to have them is Confident Aim. They do not make you generaly better with the corresponding weapons. And then: for the rare cases you really can't use any of your picked weapon proficiencies and it makes a difference for your char in combat - there's retraining. So the problem is not really pressing in my opinion. But I agree that it would be cool to be able to only "partially" retrain: only the last x levels or only proficiencies or so. That's not a bad idea. Unfortunately, like I said above, I don't think that the problems are so pressing that we will see a change in this matter (via patch). Maybe this is moddable though?

It was the same in PoE. If you didn't pick one of the highest lvl invocations (that grew in costs with every tier) at lvl-up your phrases wouldn't accumulate to the same amount as if you had. You can file a bug report. It's not a bug but it's a mechanical issue that's unfair and kind of stupid, too. The number of stacked phrases should be tied to PL or char level but not which invocations you picked.

This is very low Sonic. And I will explain: I mean trying to disingeniously drag a statement into a controversial direction where it's supposed to be torn apart. "Can two men have sex?" - "Why? You hate gay people???" If I didn't explain explicitly what I meant your next move after my statement (that it's low) would have been that you'd accuse me that I said LGBT is low. It's not only disingenuous but also clumsy. If you want to go ahead with this then be my guest. Just know that it paints a picture of a flawed ethical code.

Since you ask: - Stop claiming to present facts or truth when you are not. - Stop claiming to speak for everyone. For starters...