EnderAndrew

The preferred term is Saber-Chucks, and I say that the suggestion is pure gold.

Right now it seems like Friday afternoons (US Central time) seems to be the current suggestion.

Jill Valentine hands you another clip.

4 hours? I've had all-day sessions but I don't aim for them.

I really like D6, WoD (including Exalted and Abberant), L5R, etc. Earthdawn and Shadowrun aren't bad.

If that's Darque in the pic, GoA is the poodle. And I can't make promises when the kid comes, but it would be easier to game online so I should be able to keep the game going hopefully.

Our first session will be a group diaberlie/debauchery session with Darque's character. :darque:

Who do you love?

Ghost? Really?

Only if the Ministry of Growth is a subdivision of the Ministry of Truth.

Grab one while you can. Apple is moving to Intel processors. The sky is truly falling.

The problem is that I work graveyards. If I am going to start afternoon, it would work best if it were Thursday or Friday, my days off. In late September I am expecting my wife to shoot out our first womb discharge, which may take up quite a bit of my time. Because of that I am ending my normal Pen-and-Paper game I am running, but I may still be able to game online.

The character creation rules are pretty good, but I don't feel the 4 attributes really properly reflect a character. The system is all skills and no real attributes.

You can play as high as 9th Generation but you don't have to. 9th Generation vampires are more powerful, but you might not want to play 9th Gen because it makes you more high profile, not to mention a target for diaberlie. I happily played a 12th Gen for almost 4 years because I liked the underdog role. You increase your generation by spending points on the generation background. And I prefer that characters get sent to EnderNOSPAMAndrew at Gmail DOT com.

Lancer doesn't mind living in the case so long as he can spruce it up. :darque:

I look forward to reading all the character sheets, but we still haven't determined a time/schedule to play.

If I have time I can happily dig up some of Epiphany's posts where he has outright lied, not to mention in Volourn-esque fashion he insists on completely ignoring any facts and evidence that makes him look bad. Epiphany insists the XBox didn't have a PC CPU because it had a Celeron, which isn't really a P3. He insists that the PS3 won't have a HDD despite Sony's specs listing it as having a HDD. He insists the PS3 specs are a lie, and that it won't pull off two 1080p images, but the 360 which only produces one 720p image is clearly more powerful. He insists overall the 360 is more powerful despite all the 3rd party developers saying the PS3 will clearly have more power. He claims to be an objective non-fanboy, but he uses Microsoft as a trusted source while assuming every Sony statement is a lie. He insists that HD-DVD is a superior technology over Blu-Ray which is plain fanboyism and foolish. I include this only to demonstrate his dedicated M$ fanboy trends. He insists that the PPC processor designed by IBM from the G5 Mac line (that they also said would be in next-gen Macs) doesn't constitute PC technology, yet he insists the PS3 is just PC technology. The Cell has never been in a PC and was designed for the PS3 primarily and entertainment technology in general. He says floating point performance means nothing, despite CPU benchmarks. In fact any benchmark which proves him absolutely wrong, he discounts as meaningless. His only response to pssts that prove him wrong is that I'm an idiot and that the conversation is above me. In console threads I wasn't the first, nor the only person to declare him to be a liar. He has also outright lied on specs and facts as well.

That's fine but I'm about to head off to bed so you likely won't get feedback until tomorrow.

No problem. I like to read.

Sawyer seems to post almost daily.

Every single post you make proves you are wrong. The N64 actually had better graphic capabilities overall, a respected brand behind it, and existing franchises. No one expected Sony to succeed, but all the developers jumped ship once they realized how easy it was to develop for, yet you insist that Sony has developed a system not designed for gaming, that no one will be able to code for. You also call all the specs lie, that it won't have a HDD (despite the specs stating it does have a HDD), that they won't pull off the resolutions, etc. etc. etc. You have no facts, only assumptions that any point that makes you look bad is bull, yet you have all the faith in the world in Microsoft. The other benefits of the PS1 doesn't mean that the system wasn't easy to develop for. Every single developer swore on how easy it was to develop for.

It should be noted that while fans are clammoring for a FF7 remake on the PS3, Square-Enix has specifically stated they have no plans of doing it. They just wanted to tease all their fans with that demo.

How can anyone, the Green Dragon included, deny the Schmarthy-poo?

West Denmark doesn't have these problems.