Volourn

"Don't vent the frustration that spending $50 on a beta causes you at me, it's not my fault you buy sub-standard quality productsault you buy sub-standard quality products" BL was, and is not a substandard product. It was worth the 65$ I spent on it. As for the theif comment. It seems I was wrong. You aren't a theif. That's a good thing. Thieves deserve to be destroyed. However, you may not have bought the game; but you did rent it so yous till gavce money to a game that is supposedly "subpar" even though you enjoyed it enough to play it twice. I haven't even finsihed it twice. Obviously, though you say otherwise, the game is not subpar unless you make a habit of playing subpar games multiple times. R00fles!

Congratulations.

"Not quite. I played the game and finished it twice (at a great personal cost ). It's just I'm not about to pay 50 bucks for an alpha." Stupid thief. You should be banned.

I was being generous in 1 minutes estimation... <_<

"Most performance problems reported to Activision Customer Support are due to computer systems not meeting the minimum system requirements or not having the latest video and sound card drivers installed." Hilarious! ROTFLMAOATWTKKUYPADYT This is pathetic. My computer DESTROYS the reccomened specs, and it is slow as molasses. The arrogance on their part. Sorry; but 1 minute load times is YOUR fault; not MINE. Jerks.

"The difference that the timer in FO 1 represented the amount of time before the bad guys find your home and eliminate it or take it over" Whose to say my PC gave a dman about the Vault? Why should my game ebfore if the Vault weakling can't babysit themslves? Screw them. That's the biggest weakness of the waterchip mess. Not that FO2 was any better in that regard. Like I said, the story is exactly the same.

"I liked HotU, I did not "enjoy" it. Like I said before there is a difference, but you just wouldn't understand." Oh. Whatever. You have said in the past that you enjoyed. Nice try; though.

"FO one had a much better story" You do realize their story is exactly the same so how can one be better than the other? "Well, name one CRPG that has a beter rules system for a computer game" NWN and TOEE are two. ", more open ended yet well balanced for its story" Huh? This doesn't even make sense. FO's 'story" was merely ok. "or a better interface for its engine design?" NWN has a better interface. Maybe even the IE games as well. And, Madden too. And, New Reno was one of the two places that made FO2 as good as it was - tied with BG2 as best game. Period.

"If you haven't played KOTOR2 yet don't read reviews or come on the forums because you will be convinced he game is worse than it really is when its a great game. If you listen to what other people have to say about things like the ending and bugs it will most likely stay in the back of your head when your're playing and ruin the experience. This game is great don't let other people give you spoilers or ruin it by pointing out flaws before you play it. The ending wasn't even bad because it was really a begginig of a new journey and answered many questions if you asked questions and listened to the dialouge for example manycomplain about the game not revealing Canderous as Mandalore but if you listen to the dialouge somebody in the ending says this won't say who because I don't know how to do spoiler tags. By reading what other some people have to say you'd thank this game is a bug's nest. If you are worried about bugs the simple solution is doing the obviuos thing and making 2 save files that way if one gets corrupted you will have another. Discover the beauty of the game yourself by avoiding others opinions and criticisms. It worked for me" I see. It's wrong for us to pay attention to the negative comments; but we should listen to the positive ones. Or better yet ignore evrryone and we play the game we'll be told:"You should ahve done your research for spending your money." Hahaha! "There are no exceptions. At least for me." That's hilarious! You enjoyed HOTU a lot, IIRC. WOWSERS!

"Oh, I am quite jaded and cynical. To tell the truth I haven't really enjoyed a computer game since BG2. " Get your story striaght and maybe I'll believe you. You said you liked SOU. You liked HOTU. You gave the OC 75% and KOTOR almost 90%. You logged somewhere around 400 hours for MW. Geez.. Hades... I know it's that time of the month for you; but still. <_< "Thing is for a a game published back in 1997 its pretty damn sad that they have yet made a game better." FO2, BG1, and BG2 are all better than FO1. NWN: TEP is also better. Next.

No. Large empty spammed repeatable space is not a strength.

"Other than that, Revan had no character." You didn't play KOTOR.

"However, Obsidian made many improvements from Bioware's design." For some reason, I have a hunch that BIo would have made improvements as well. For some reason, I doubt they'd have released KOTOR2 exactly as KOTOR1. I'd imagine there'd be more force powers, feats, and such and who knows what other stuff would be added. Plus, BIo probably would have had at least 2 years. It's a tad too easy to brag about 'improvements' Obsidian has made considering a lot of the game and espiciailly the engine was already done for them. P.S. Random loot is NOT an improvement.. As for KOTOR3, I'd say a brand new company should make it simply because it might as well follow the pattern. Then we can have 3 sets of fans bashing each other about whose KOTOR is the best. The fun! R00fles!

Ehh.. What's your point? To agree with me? You just, once again, showed the mislogic of SS. Hmm..

"Yeah but that's quite hard to check through the net!" Which is why I find it hard to trust anyone on the internet.

I, for one, don't trust anyone's comments at face value. No one on the internet is at that level. Unless they are HOT women. :">

"The logic is quite simple. "Why make a story about someone elses b-grade NPCs when we can make our own stories?" Yeah. That would be fine and dandy if they brought back towo robots as well as used other characters in KOTOR2. Once again, your so called "logic" fails to impress since the actuality is far different than what you claim it to be. R00fles!

"like Yuthura Ban, who is in all likelyhood dead, and wasn't even a primary point of interest in the game she was originally in." Yet, she's a pretty popular character. Imagine that, a sequel drawing from an apparant strength (to many) of the original. WOWSERS! Instead they bring back a 1 bit tin can that had less to say than Yuthura and it was a aprty member! Hahaha. There is no logic in that.

"Some people I either don't know or don't completely "respect" have had a lot of negative things to say about the game." You don't respect Hades? That's rude. Now, if you didn't respect me; that would be understandable. Hades is pure as the yellow snow.

"Maybe you should actually play the game before you belittle someone for their opinion. Perhaps your expectations are too high and you are unable to see the improvements because KOTOR2 isn't a leap forward from KOTOR1. " Other than teasing him about beinga fanboy; I'm not belittling Ender at all. As for not having played the game; one does not need to when multiple people have shared their experiences with the game and I can use logic to see what makes sense. Of course, it's not like I'm saying KOTOR2 sucks the big one. I'm just syaing it's not as perfect as Ender seems to claim it is.

"New Lightsaber upgrades."" Just makes them overpowered. Not really an improvement. I mean you now have 6-7 "slots" to embue it with ridiulous powers. "Lightsaber forms" This is cool. A very good improvement. It's too bad its wasted in what seems to be an easy game much like all of TOEE options (aside from 5' step). "Influence system" I thought so too; but now from what I've ehard it's a mixed bag. "Random loot" Improvement? This is a weakness. Random loot sucks in RPGs. Yeah, that guy carries a red lightsabre; but he drops a blue one. Hahaha. A REAL improvement. Indeed. "MUCH better dialogue" We shall see; but I doubt it consideirng the already high quality dialogue of the first game. Plus, youa re a MCA fanboy (no offense! ) so I'll take your word here with a grain of salt. "A real dark side path" Eh? The first game had a REAL dark side path. This point makes no sense. "Tons more replay value" Maybe. But, cosnideirng I've only finished KOTOR1ce (on my seocnd way through); I doubt KOTOR2 will get more than 2 play throughs max for me. The KOTOR series doesn't reek of that due to the cinemtatic nature. "Weapon switching on the fly" In KOTOR1. "More force powers" More choice is always good; but not really an 'improvement'. "The new workbench - this is huge" In some ways, yes; in some ways no. It's greta to eb able to use it so; but considering the over poweredness of the characters; it just makes you more uber. "Much better skill implementation. Every attribute and skill is worthwhile now." Huh? I found every attribute and skill wortwhhile in KOTOR1. We shall see about KOTOR2; but the fact it sues skills more in dialogue (apparantly) is cool. In conclusion, KOTOR2 will probably be good; but you overrate it's quality most likely and call things improvement when they really aren't. Tsk, tsk.

"Now new conversation threads are opened up via events in the game, and influence rather than leveling up. It was silly that Carth wouldn't talk to me unless I got an abitrary ammount of xp. Even if nothing new happened in the plot, but now because I hit 10,000 XP he has something new to say. " Huh? It wasn't always about leevelling up. Lots of times they start talking to you depending on the area you in or the story point youa re in. Are people saying that KOTOR2 npcs don't approach you at all or very little in KOTOR2 to talk to you? If so, that sucks... They are robots there for your pleasure...

"The only difference is the intent." Bingo. "Again, if somebody misinterprets you, you start a fight because you assume they hold you ill will?" Huh? Did you rerad my last post. I don't get into fights. Period. And, when I fought way back when it had nothing do with conceptions; but with fists coming wards me. Come on, dude, pay attention.

"That's one of the stupidest things I've read from you. And man, you do say a lot of stupid things. So, if somebody just misunderstands you say, at work, you start a fight?" Hilarious. That expalins why the last time I got into a a fight was in high school which was years. You lose again when making up fictional scenarios. There's a huge difference between misunderstanding someone. It's another to twist someone words. If you can't see the difference; you are obviously unable to graps the meanings of those two different words. "Heh, you are one sad, sad little man." Actually, I am *always* happy. Happy happy joy joy. :"> "Magical Volo, once NWN2 comes out, we should join a clan once again!" No. That just leads to lawsuits and lawyers. I'll pass.

"LMFAO. Yeah, you sure do focus on the topic as hand. I still remember those 7 or 8 posts in which you kept spamming 'what are you babbling about?' just because you had suffered a brain cell lockup but just couldn't let it be." You don't remember clearly obviously since it was mor elike half that number at around 3 or 4 not 7 or 8 (ro maybe I'm not rmemebering clearly, meh). And, you were babbling so I was asking you to clarify. You chose not to so I repeated the question. "Attack you where? It was you who started it all when you started whining about me twisting your post. That might have been a misunderstanding, but it was by no means a personal attack. However you responded with one of your pitiful attempts at wit." I consider someone twisting my words to mean something completely different as an attack. Don't twist posts anymore and there won't be as much problems; but since we both know trolls like you cna't help themslves there will be more. Your turn, moni amigot.