Leaderboard

Happy New Year.

Because they want to do business there and because more than likely China has investments in the company. Why should Chinese companies care about the US rules, the answer is more than obvious.

It turns out that if you put phrases in your chants and then respec and don't pick those phrases again you can still use them ! As long as you don't remove them from your chant. So you make a chant with the all the phrases and then "sculpt" a custom chant from the original chant. This way I avoided picking any phrases at all.

It was just pointed out to me that the beginning of the new Year already spells: Wednesday Thursday Friday So not getting my hopes up

The only joke was Marija Popic, made a mistake on the actual name. It's a common joke here in Serbia that most famous people in the world are just Serbs who changed their names to sound more western. For an example, Elon Muskovic.

It's Mary Poppins BTW, unless there is a joke here I am missing. Thankfully, Polish translation didn't try to polishise character's name. I hate when they do that.

I actually really miss 20-26 episode seasons

Seems like Disney’s Balls are firmly grabbed by their Chinese overlords. You are not even allowed to type Winnie the Pooh into the chat of their Marvel Rival game. Not to mention if you are born in 1989, your out of luck too, you can’t type that year as well

Fourth GOG giveaway during this winter sale. https://www.gog.com/en/game/vambrace_cold_soul

Yeah, I hope some extra depth will go with it as well. Eh, it is just a trailer. With gamepass there is no way I won't be checking it out anyway.

So.. I bought a game from my wishlist this Christmas break, Drova - Forsaken Kin, and installed it yesterday when I got back from my mother's place. Thought I'd "try it out". 19,7 hours later (IN ONE SITTING) I have to say: it is Gothic 2D! Absolutely love it so far. Long time since I felt this much joy from a game. Dark, difficult and dangerous, with absolutely no hand-holding, just as I like it.

Something random YouTube came up with had me in stitches. I laughed so hard my sides hurt. Can you imagine, The Critical Drinker apparently had a Kickstarter project to make his very own short film. Now, for those of you who don't know, which is I hope most of you, The Critical Drinker is one of those obviously conservative YouTube channels that focus on criticizing wokeness in mainstream media. Well, actually, no, he's calling himself a film critic, but in reality once you have watched a video or two of his it becomes clear that his own critical thinking ability is not all that greatly developed. This leads to having content such as stating that Star Trek: Picard is bad because a female admiral is giving Picard some lip while at the same time extoling the virtues of Star Trek: The Next Generation, a series that has plenty of episodes with female admirals giving Picard some lip, or even sue him with the intent of ruining his career. For the longest while of the Next Generation era of Star Trek, Admirals were the go-to people in the Federation whenever the writers needed a threat, a villain or just someone who is a completely unsympathetic higher up serving as a foil to properly contrast our heroes. If he had actually watched any of the TNG era Star Trek while paying attention, he would have known that. Alas, he either didn't, or didn't have the mental capacity to process, and his brain reached the conclusion that wokeness RUINED Star Trek. As if Star Trek wasn't ever among the most woke series on air. What it used to be, though, before the TNG movies, before Enterprise and arguably before parts of Voyager, was well written and engaging in addition to presenting philosophical conundrums and a brighter, optimistic look at the future. Star Trek: Picard ruined that by making the Federation Tump's America, which was a current issue at the time, and by having that cynical backdrop that simply does not fit into the existing Star Trek canon than further dragged down by atrocious writing, a stupid plot and terrible characters. But @majestic, what does that have to do with his Kickstarter project? Well, it just recently came out. A forty minute short film that no longer is a film, but has been turned into a TV series proof of concept (they at least had the sense to not call it a pilot). A project that overshot its Kickstarter goal by a factor of fifteen, raking in some 300,000 pounds instead of the 20,000 he asked for. This is it: I don't blame you if you do not want to sit through forty minutes of the most rote Steven Seagal level straight to video schlock. In fact, I suppose, I encourage you to not give him any clicks. Watching it makes it clear why he has called it a TV series proof of concept. It's not that all technical parts of the film are terrible (the stunt work is fine, actually), except for the soundtrack and the audio mixing, but that writing is... well, how do I put that nicely? It's an incoherent disaster, hence why it is called a proof of concept - after all, if all you have is a bunch of scenes you cannot string together into a coherent narrative because you suck at making films (oh, the irony), just call it a proof of concept and hope your seriously dumb fanbase does not notice*. Here's the bit that made me laugh though - I mean, as bad as the film is, what else would one expect from The Critical Drinker - it's that precisely the same people who watch his channel for his critiques are the ones making fun of him in the comments. People are calling him a grifter and a hypocrite, and those are the nicer ones. It's fair, considering that the thing he is most famous for (aside from writing forgettable spy thriller novels which are what this proof of concept is sort of an adaptation of) is making fun of bad writing on YouTube. Eh, looks like bad writing is still bad, even if you subtract the wokeness, although, dumb short film still features a girl boss coming to the rescue of the protagonist. Edit: Contrast this with the aforementioned Turbo Kid, which had a budget of 60,000 Canadian dollars in 2015, and out came a heartfelt and fun movie that is also a great homage to the 80ies... and it featured Michael Ironside as villain. *There are those who blame it on not having enough creative control. Over the film he raised the funds for and credits him as one of the writers of the script, with behind the scenes footage clearly showing his being present and giving input at every turn. Right.

Guess I have a sort-of Millennium Falcon now. (No Man's Sky)

Just started playing BG 3; I'm up to 5th level and heading into the Underdark. Playstyle-wise it's awfully similar to D:OS 1 & 2, with a D&D ruleset pasted on top. At least the characters have realistic-looking stats, unlike in D:OS. The amount of cut scene cinematics is impressive, and the facial/gesture animation work is top notch. But levelling up is definitely a slog, and too many battles are time-wasting do-overs. I had more fun with the Solasta tactical combat system; at least they felt winnable, up until they weren't. I definitely miss the Dodge action in BG 3.

Monitor/screen type and settings does tend to affect how much of a difference is noticeable. eg, it's a fair bit more noticeable on the 4k OLED, vs older 1440 LED. Outside of "sunray shadow filter" and any fancy reflections, it's mostly about contrast and brightness and very subtle angling, re: light filtering, seems to me. I can imagine. And then if one has to add DLSS on top of it just to get the fps. Still cracks me up when people say how their 40xx runs it great at native supreme/fullPT at 1440/4k/100fps .... and then they finally mention using "DLSS at Performance + Frame Gen." The definition/knowledge of "native" seems to be slipping away.

Shame about blondie