Wrath of Dagon Posted February 23, 2017 Author Share Posted February 23, 2017 WoD doesnt believe in those statistics, which makes this a pretty big waste of time. Only evidence that supports his narrative are applicable.As I explained earlier, Obama started counting people turned back at the border as deportations, which they weren't counted as before. The actual interior deportations declined dramatically: http://cis.org/ICE-deportations-hit-10-yr-low?platform=hootsuite "Moral indignation is a standard strategy for endowing the idiot with dignity." Marshall McLuhan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hurlshort Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 It would probably bother me less that you are using CIS as your source if you didn't freak out every time I've mentioned CAIR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valsuelm Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMWcq83GJD4 The MSM in a nutshell. Been going on in overdrive for the better part of 100 years.... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valsuelm Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malcador Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMWcq83GJD4 The MSM in a nutshell. Well, pretty much any media as well. Youtube has such gems of that these days. F**king Internet. 1 Why has elegance found so little following? Elegance has the disadvantage that hard work is needed to achieve it and a good education to appreciate it. - Edsger Wybe Dijkstra Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hurlshort Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 I was listening to someone talk about how much safer things used to be in DC. They said you could walk around the Capitol Building and see Ted Kennedy, or even walk up to the White House and ring the doorbell. But then later on I thought about it a bit more and I was like "Was this in the 60's when the Kennedy's were shot, or the 70's when we had Watergate and a bunch of high level staffers got convicted?" We've given up a lot of our freedoms in the name of security. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valsuelm Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 (edited) I was listening to someone talk about how much safer things used to be in DC. They said you could walk around the Capitol Building and see Ted Kennedy, or even walk up to the White House and ring the doorbell. But then later on I thought about it a bit more and I was like "Was this in the 60's when the Kennedy's were shot, or the 70's when we had Watergate and a bunch of high level staffers got convicted?" We've given up a lot of our freedoms in the name of security. Nah.... only some have given up their freedoms. The rest of us have been kicking and screaming all while being told we're the crazy ones by folks gullible enough to believe the pure BS they're fed in the bought and paid for media and by bought and paid for politicians.... The folks that pull the strings on the government are evil mofos, more evil than you and most give them credit for, and far smarter than you and most give them credit for. And those are the two primary reasons they get away with what they get away with. But hey... I'm just a whacky conspiracy theorist guy. A cynic even (apparently). Here's a truth: The U.S. is far less free than it was 100 years ago, and far less secure as well. The same could be said for 50 years ago, or 20 years ago as well. That is not an accident. Can you wrap your head around it and explain it? The U.S. is not a free nation. Relative to the rest of the world? Sure. But that's one hell of a horrible comparison. Relative to itself once upon a time it's become a tyrannically Marxist state with oodles of fascism through and through. 'None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.' Edited February 23, 2017 by Valsuelm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guard Dog Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 I was listening to someone talk about how much safer things used to be in DC. They said you could walk around the Capitol Building and see Ted Kennedy, or even walk up to the White House and ring the doorbell. But then later on I thought about it a bit more and I was like "Was this in the 60's when the Kennedy's were shot, or the 70's when we had Watergate and a bunch of high level staffers got convicted?" We've given up a lot of our freedoms in the name of security. Nah.... only some have given up their freedoms. The rest of us have been kicking and screaming all while being told we're the crazy ones by folks gullible enough to believe the pure BS they're fed in the bought and paid for media and by bought and paid for politicians.... The folks that pull the strings on the government are evil mofos, more evil than you and most give them credit for, and far smarter than you and most give them credit for. And those are the two primary reasons they get away with what they get away with. But hey... I'm just a whacky conspiracy theorist guy. A cynic even (apparently). Here's a truth: The U.S. is far less free than it was 100 years ago, and far less secure as well. The same could be said for 50 years ago, or 20 years ago as well. That is not an accident. Can you wrap your head around it and explain it? The U.S. is not a free nation. Relative to the rest of the world? Sure. But that's one hell of a horrible comparison. Relative to itself once upon a time it's become a tyrannically Marxist state with oodles of fascism through and through. 'None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.' You're cynical because here you are quoting Goethe, correctly identifying the worst ills of our age, creeping authoritarianism and the public's willing acceptance of it, all while rejecting the very people who agree with you as being "more of the same". For the record I don't disagree with anything you said. Unfortunately, with the possible exception of the Goresuch nomination, the election of Trump has done nothing to slow that down. "While it is true you learn with age, the down side is what you often learn is what a damn fool you were before" Thomas Sowell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hurlshort Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 There is a very large middle ground here though. Bummer, I am not as free as I was 100 years ago, but I am also not going to get polio. *shrug* 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gromnir Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 100 years ago? 1917? definite weren't more free for blacks, native americans, asians and others. weren't more free for women, and they were/are better than 1/2 the population, yes? 1917 is also the year the infamous espionage act(s) o' 1917 were made law. the Court didn't get around to knocking some o' the free speech teeth abridgements outta the act 'til 1969 with brandenburg v. ohio. also, folks ignore our frequent lessons 'bout the dangers o' democracy. contrary to what most folks believe, democracy ain't what protects your freedoms. democracy is the danger, not the solution. our checks and balances which make our government so ineffective is what largely protects folks. culture also protects. but democracy? democracy is the majority, and the majority has never been a trustworthy repository o' freedom. the majority is petty and fearful and often very stoopid. for much o' US history, the fed government had very little say regarding how States protected freedoms o' citizens. never forget that the bill o' rights is a check on democracy, and that check were a relative weak limit for much o' US history. oh, and absolute liberty rare equates to universal freedom. those with money and power have an advantage in maintaining the status quo. those w/o are typical too busy trying to make ends meet to serious devote energy to changing the system. so in the early 1900s we got stuff such as child coal miners https://arlweb.msha.gov/CENTURY/LITTLE/PAGE1.asp and women working in factories in nyc http://www.history.com/topics/triangle-shirtwaist-fire give folks a myth o' equal opportunity and call it freedom? is seeming paradoxical, but absolute liberty do not result in perfect freedom. hobbes' state of nature is absolute liberty, but it ain't what most o' us think o' as freedom. given human nature, absolute liberty, freedom from any kinda government constraint, inevitable results in the exploitation o' man by his fellow man. dunno, but particular as a native american, am having little difficulty proclaiming with certainty our greater freedom today than were enjoyed by our great grandparents and grandparents. 5 "If there be time to expose through discussion the falsehood and fallacies, to avert the evil by the processes of education, the remedy to be applied is more speech, not enforced silence."Justice Louis Brandeis, Concurring, Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (1927) "Im indifferent to almost any murder as long as it doesn't affect me or mine."--Gfted1 (September 30, 2019) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guard Dog Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 Yes Gromnir, humans are awful SOBs who, even here in these supposedly enlightened shores, have often fallen short of honoring the kinship between all of us. And yes absolute liberty is anarchy, something no one is asking for. I'll trot out one of my favorite James Madison quotes here: "What is government itself but the greatest of all reflections on human nature? If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary." And yes Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on the lunch menu. To quote Madison again "There is no maxim, in my opinion, which is more liable to be misapplied, and which, therefore, more needs elucidation, than the current one, that the interest of the majority is the political standard of right and wrong." As you pointed out that is why we don't live in a democracy. All that said I don't think it's at all a stretch to wonder if we have passed Socrates "fair and glorious beginning out of which spring tyranny" when you can go to jail for massaging a horse or the police shut down a child's neighborhood lemonade stand. We ARE becoming far less free by the very minute and it horrifies me to see the acquiescence to it because the Executive or Legislatures measuring everyone for chains is on "their team". Undercutting Val's entire argument because things used to be worse in many ways misses the point he was making. Like I said repeatedly in the months before November. If you continue to choose the lesser of two evils all you get is evil. In every election there are names on the ballot that believe in a balance between liberty and the power of the Government and names that don't. 129 million Americans voted for a name that didn't. "While it is true you learn with age, the down side is what you often learn is what a damn fool you were before" Thomas Sowell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gromnir Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 Undercutting Val's entire argument because things used to be worse in many ways misses the point he was making. am thinking you vast understate the ways in which things were worse 100 years ago, and if children's lemonade stand closures bother you, then am wondering how you feel 'bout fact that the loving case were 1967? heck, were a considerable time post civil war before most States would recognize the possibility o' a black woman being raped by a white man. ain't just 'bout race neither. upton sinclair's protagonist in the jungle, published in 1906, were lithuanian. the accurate depiction o' horrors faced by an immigrant working in the chicago meatpacking industry were vivid documented and so offended the sensibilities o' the elite o' boston that the book were banned in that city. banned books? want us to recite the history of banned books in, of all places, the US of A? such bannings is largely a thing o' the past, and is limited to vague community standards of "obscene," but the First Amendment weren't always so protective o' authors or artists. 100 years ago v. today? were our personal freedoms more at risk then or now? sure, technology allows the Government greater access to our privacy, but the notion o' privacy as a protected freedom is actual a recent legal invention. *shrug* not even a second does we need consider which time were having more more o' our freedoms protected. http://www.history.com/topics/native-american-history/wounded-knee not one second. 1 "If there be time to expose through discussion the falsehood and fallacies, to avert the evil by the processes of education, the remedy to be applied is more speech, not enforced silence."Justice Louis Brandeis, Concurring, Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (1927) "Im indifferent to almost any murder as long as it doesn't affect me or mine."--Gfted1 (September 30, 2019) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guard Dog Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 It's ironic that you point out Wounded Knee when I would say that is a perfect example of heavy handed government needing it's fangs pulled. And as you already know I'm firmly on the side of the plaintiffs in both the Loving and Obgerfell cases. I think you and I were having two different conversations. You are pointing at the past and trying to tell me how much better things are now. I'm pointing at now and trying to tell you how much worse they are than they should be. "While it is true you learn with age, the down side is what you often learn is what a damn fool you were before" Thomas Sowell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pidesco Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 I think you and I were having two different conversations. You are pointing at the past and trying to tell me how much better things are now. I'm pointing at now and trying to tell you how much worse they are than they should be. Valsuelm specifically said things were safer and freer 100 years ago, not that things should be better they are now. That improvement is currently required would brook no argument from anyone, I'd say. To say that things are worse now than before regarding safety and freedom is patently silly, be it 30, 50, 70 or 100 years ago. Relevant: 1 "My hovercraft is full of eels!" - Hungarian touristI am Dan Quayle of the Romans.I want to tattoo a map of the Netherlands on my nether lands.Heja Sverige!!Everyone should cuffawkle more.The wrench is your friend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guard Dog Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 (edited) I'm not arguing Val's points. He can do that himself. I just said because things are better now in many ways than they used to be does not mean they are not getting worse right now. Grom undercut Val's argument on the details. I'm just pointing out that despite being factually incorrect as far as dates and history go there is still a valid point here. The needle on the authoritarian vs liberty meter is on the wrong side of the median. EDIT: because things are better now in many ways than they used to be does not mean they are not getting worse right now : Oh man, that sentence. You can tell by this time last night was more than a little in my bourbon bottle. It makes my head hurt just reading that line. But it's funny so I'll leave it alone. Edited February 23, 2017 by Guard Dog "While it is true you learn with age, the down side is what you often learn is what a damn fool you were before" Thomas Sowell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BruceVC Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 I'm not arguing Val's points. He can do that himself. I just said because things are better now in many ways than they used to be does not mean they are not getting worse right now. Grom undercut Val's argument on the details. I'm just pointing out that despite being factually incorrect as far as dates and history go there is still a valid point here. The needle on the authoritarian vs liberty meter is on the wrong side of the median. GD what would you say are worse nowadays or what do you think is getting worse? "Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is and saw Virtue in her shape how lovely: and pined his loss” John Milton "We don't stop playing because we grow old; we grow old because we stop playing.” - George Bernard Shaw "What counts in life is not the mere fact that we have lived. It is what difference we have made to the lives of others that will determine the significance of the life we lead" - Nelson Mandela Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrath of Dagon Posted February 23, 2017 Author Share Posted February 23, 2017 It would probably bother me less that you are using CIS as your source if you didn't freak out every time I've mentioned CAIR. CAIR is a Muslim Brotherhood front, like it or not. CIS numbers in those charts are from ICE. "Moral indignation is a standard strategy for endowing the idiot with dignity." Marshall McLuhan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hurlshort Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 (edited) If CAIR us muslim brotherhood, then CIS is white supremicist. You are only favoring one over the other because it supports your opinion. Edited February 23, 2017 by Hurlshot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guard Dog Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 I'm not arguing Val's points. He can do that himself. I just said because things are better now in many ways than they used to be does not mean they are not getting worse right now. Grom undercut Val's argument on the details. I'm just pointing out that despite being factually incorrect as far as dates and history go there is still a valid point here. The needle on the authoritarian vs liberty meter is on the wrong side of the median. GD what would you say are worse nowadays or what do you think is getting worse? Bruce this deserves a longer response that I have time for. Have to go to work and I'm a little hung over. "While it is true you learn with age, the down side is what you often learn is what a damn fool you were before" Thomas Sowell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrath of Dagon Posted February 23, 2017 Author Share Posted February 23, 2017 How is CIS white supremacist? CAIR was an unindicted co-conspirator in a major terrorism financing case. But we went over all that before. "Moral indignation is a standard strategy for endowing the idiot with dignity." Marshall McLuhan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gromnir Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 I think you and I were having two different conversations. You are pointing at the past and trying to tell me how much better things are now. I'm pointing at now and trying to tell you how much worse they are than they should be. if you don't like the now, then change it. is only bad 'cause we let it be bad. patriot act were voted overwhelming bipartisan. the ordinance preventing your little girl lemonade stand? weren't a demagogue who implemented. is nothing preventing you from getting changed. you are part of heavy handed government, so fix it. and yeah, val's argument sucked. we got far more functional freedom today than 100 or even 50 years ago. has government become too protective and invasive in specific situations? sure it has, and we rail 'gainst such, but use patently wrong and utter ridiculous appeals to the past is not gonna help. just realize it is the saame democracy we spoke o' earlier which makes it possible for government to do stoopid stuff such as patriot acts and little girl lemonade stand prohibitions. such democracy is also available to you if you wanna change. fix the problems. we made the problems. now fix. HA! Good Fun! "If there be time to expose through discussion the falsehood and fallacies, to avert the evil by the processes of education, the remedy to be applied is more speech, not enforced silence."Justice Louis Brandeis, Concurring, Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (1927) "Im indifferent to almost any murder as long as it doesn't affect me or mine."--Gfted1 (September 30, 2019) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hurlshort Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 How is CIS white supremacist? CAIR was an unindicted co-conspirator in a major terrorism financing case. But we went over all that before. Do some research on CIS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hurlshort Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 and yeah, val's argument sucked. we got far more functional freedom today than 100 or even 50 years ago. Whoa whoa, I've seen a lot of Westerns, and you could totally get away with a lot of cool stuff back then. Isn't that why Westworld was so popular? In a bit more serious vein, I was researching my great grandfather recently for a little project, and in the 1935 census he had taken on two borders. They were both teachers, and they didn't have to pay taxes! I was jealous. But then it said they made $496 that year, so it was a bit of a wash. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gfted1 Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 Not too shabby. That equals $8,644.81 today. 1 "I'm your biggest fan, Ill follow you until you love me, Papa" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elerond Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 (edited) and yeah, val's argument sucked. we got far more functional freedom today than 100 or even 50 years ago. Whoa whoa, I've seen a lot of Westerns, and you could totally get away with a lot of cool stuff back then. Isn't that why Westworld was so popular? In a bit more serious vein, I was researching my great grandfather recently for a little project, and in the 1935 census he had taken on two borders. They were both teachers, and they didn't have to pay taxes! I was jealous. But then it said they made $496 that year, so it was a bit of a wash. Hey, that is about $9000 in today's money EDIT: Ninjaded by Gfted1 Edited February 23, 2017 by Elerond 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts