213374U

So then why would they want to listen to the soundtrack in the first place?

I didn't post the image, it was someone else. However that person posted the image in reference to one of my posts in which I mentioned that very picture. Again, you are proven totally clueless. I don't discuss the reasons, you do. I'm just saying I couldn't have had the thread removed through spamming. You haven't been able to prove otherwise so far. And yes, its a fact that you weren't part of the reason that the thread was removed. Just like the fact that things fall upwards. Everyone knows that. Cool. Whenever you are unable to make your reasons prevail in a discussion, you just take full advantage of the ignore function. Yeah, that must be a great way to avoid feeling stupid. Good luck with that.

Gee, that's such a good idea. I wonder why people didn't come up with it before.

I don't know nor do I care what the moderator reasons were for deleting your thread. If the removal was unjustified (which somehow I doubt), then you should have contacted an admin or someone else explaining the situation. At any rate, it's impossible I could have had a thread removed by spamming, because that would actually allow spammers to disrupt the boards. Is it too complex an argument for you to understand? As always, I give reasons to back my claims, while you give nothing but moans and whines. So says the one who defined a renowned piece of Renaissance art as a 'nude picture'. ROTFLMFAOPMP! Get a clue, dumbo.

Right, you can't be sued. But you can't stop people from trying, either. "

Uno de mayo de mil ochocientos seis. Treinta y uno de diciembre de dos mil cuatro. Siete de enero de mil novecientos cuarenta y dos.

It's been that way since the dawn of time. History is about empires rising and falling all the time. And when there hasn't been a clear hegemony, people have suffered the consequences of power struggles, or even worse (i.e. Cold War). To think it can be any other way and work is just a utopia. I'd rather have a democracy ruling the world (with all its flaws) through aggressive economical strategies than a totalitarian regime like the chinese, thank you very much. And um, last time I checked, socialism had been proven a failure.

The thing is, threads don't get deleted because of spam. If spam is indeed plaguing the thread, it's simply pruned. What's spam is removed, and what's not stays so people can continue to engage on fruitful conversations. If the whole thread was removed it was because: The topic did start as spam, in which case it would have been deleted. The topic contained spoilers or wasn't in the appropriate forum, in which case it would have simply been moved. In any case, it's impossible I could have had one of your threads removed through spamming. So quit lying through the internet and go read something about Renaissance art.

and I thought they did anything to get Lucas more money. er...should I have said that? Yeah, well. That would even make sense if they were planning to release the K2 soundtrack commercially, but that doesn't seem to be the case. So, no. They are just not allowing it for... absolutely no reason. It feels good to know you are supporting such a bunch of f*ckheads, doesn't it? Anyway, thanks both Meshugger and Akari.

So much for classic culture.

This thread had been dead for over a month until some newb went gravedigging so, who cares?

Heh. So this is a personal grudge? Don't mind me kiddo, I just troll for fun. And I doubt very much I had one of your threads about Nihilus removed because I very much try to avoid spoilers. Don't blame me for the lack of quality of your posts that makes them undistinguishable from spam.

I don't think he meant to do that kind of distinction. You still left out the WoD and the Post Nuclear waste of Fallout.

Yeah, dude. They should close down the London National Gallery for displaying such raunchy stuff. Man, I hear some people even take their kids there! What's wrong with those people? There ya go:

You... you! *waves fist at Ludozee*

Likes: Naked girls. Girls in hot mini skirts. Flaming. Family Guy. Um... girls? Dislikes: Hipocrisy. Waking up early. Cowardice. Hangovers. Everyone else seems to be having more sex than me.

OMG 15th century pr0n! :ph34r: That depends on the guy. We're rather simple but not so simple as to not have different tastes. I prefer 'em more curvy than skinny, myself, but heh, after a few drinks I'm not too picky.

That statement just proves the opposite. I mean, you're not a jerk. If you were you would be probably flaming somebody rather than whining 'bout it. Congrats, you're not a jerk. Again Hades goes off on a tangent. No, Hades. I'm not overly excited about skin and bones either. But that wasn't my point. What I meant is that as Drakon said, usually a girl will have to catch your eye before you move in for the kill. That's how it works. I have already heard your mind-over-matter speech so save it. No amount of of willpower can suppress an involuntary response. And um, why do you always turn every topic into a discussion about yourself? So what (famous) woman in RL would you describe as with classical physical attributes, i.e. who do you you think is an attractive woman? Well, strictly speaking, classical looks is something like Botticelli's Birth of Venus, yet somehow I doubt that's what Hades meant.

Wasn't that 21337's sig a little while ago? Yes, it was until my crappy ISP decided they didn't feel like hosting my stuff any longer. What a bunch of snake oil salesmen. :angry:

I'm level 4. Does that qualify as having a life?

And how do you know if a woman is 'cerebral' or not without talking to her? Exactly, you can't. You know what I'm talking about Hades. Don't do it again, will ya?

and...? i see no problem w/ that <{POST_SNAPBACK}> The problem is that you don't see a problem with that. Your friend would disagree, though. I know I would, and I'm not that much of a weirdo. Yep. The same way we guys are attracted to hot chicks, girls are drawn to guys who display certain 'alpha traits'. A lot of those traits are often found in jerks. Nothing wrong with following instinct. There's a genetic factor to it, too. I don't believe in a cosmic or karmic or whatever connection. It all comes down to chemistry. Now I only have to find Teh Ultimate Formula... :ph34r:

Um, no, they wouldn't. Do you think that say, Mauritania would declare war on the US if they launched a nuclear strike against Korea? Think again. The small fishes would just try to stay out of the way and pray that they don't piss the guy with the WMDs too much. Cowardice works better at saving one's hide than high ideals. But I like nukes. :'( I don't know. I've been playing on the easier levels now and I don't think I'll play harder than Regent. On that level you play more or less on equal conditions with the AI, and my idea of increasing a game difficulty != increasing the AI cheating level. Much less if the cheating is so inconspicuous. However, if people do indeed get so hardcore that they actually need the dumb AI boosted to cheating levels, then let 'em brag.