Jump to content

213374U

Members
  • Posts

    5642
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

Everything posted by 213374U

  1. Heh, I'd never imagined I'd take lessons about my mother language on these boards. Now I've seen it all. :D You are right. Partially right at least. Primero is the ordinal form and it's more of an archaic/highly formal way of putting it, therefore not usually applied to dates. But yes, I've seen it and it certainly is correct. However I didn't think it would have much use outside of logs or official documents, and even then, I think it would be regarded as an archaism.
  2. Any excuse is good, eh Hades?
  3. 3 words: No Story Whatsoever.
  4. I knew you would like it. However this is one of those few changes that actually favor game balance instead of destroying it. Besides, it's not the core ruleset we're talking about here. You almost managed to get me confused. Almost. Still, it's unrealistic that the characters can carry 3 or 4 heavy weapons, 2 armors, a ton of ammo, grenades, and stimpacks, and be able to fight as if they were carrying nothing apart from their weapon. The only RPG i've seen come close to 'realistic' inventory management was Deus Ex. It had really strict size (and weight perhaps?) limits and if you wanted to carry even two heavy weapons, you wouldn't have any size left at all. And still it was somewhat unrealistic. I don't think you want Counter-Strike sized inventories, do you? You want the rules to make sense? Me too. But having every thing you kill drop their stuff and then being able to carry inhuman amounts of thrash just doesn't make sense.
  5. I don't feel dumber for visiting the LA forums. Quite the opposite in fact. The comparison favors me in that case, you see... "
  6. It's not like they're missing anything...
  7. You can, just don't expect to win that bet. "
  8. Unfortunately, that doesn't work from a game balance standpoint. CRPGs are not PnP RPGs, hence you can't have the same rules, period. I'm all for realism in that sort of things, but then again, how do you justify carrying around 25 armors and 500 lightsabers?
  9. I know you're fond of the absurd but... this time you've outdone yourself.
  10. To have something to look forward to while waiting for the game? You, sir, are a weirdo. And quit blasting my arguments!
  11. Star Control II. It came for free with my copy of SC3 and it actually made the whole purchase worth it.
  12. No.
  13. So then why would they want to listen to the soundtrack in the first place?
  14. I didn't post the image, it was someone else. However that person posted the image in reference to one of my posts in which I mentioned that very picture. Again, you are proven totally clueless. I don't discuss the reasons, you do. I'm just saying I couldn't have had the thread removed through spamming. You haven't been able to prove otherwise so far. And yes, its a fact that you weren't part of the reason that the thread was removed. Just like the fact that things fall upwards. Everyone knows that. Cool. Whenever you are unable to make your reasons prevail in a discussion, you just take full advantage of the ignore function. Yeah, that must be a great way to avoid feeling stupid. Good luck with that.
  15. Gee, that's such a good idea. I wonder why people didn't come up with it before.
  16. I don't know nor do I care what the moderator reasons were for deleting your thread. If the removal was unjustified (which somehow I doubt), then you should have contacted an admin or someone else explaining the situation. At any rate, it's impossible I could have had a thread removed by spamming, because that would actually allow spammers to disrupt the boards. Is it too complex an argument for you to understand? As always, I give reasons to back my claims, while you give nothing but moans and whines. So says the one who defined a renowned piece of Renaissance art as a 'nude picture'. ROTFLMFAOPMP! Get a clue, dumbo.
  17. Right, you can't be sued. But you can't stop people from trying, either. "
  18. Uno de mayo de mil ochocientos seis. Treinta y uno de diciembre de dos mil cuatro. Siete de enero de mil novecientos cuarenta y dos.
  19. It's been that way since the dawn of time. History is about empires rising and falling all the time. And when there hasn't been a clear hegemony, people have suffered the consequences of power struggles, or even worse (i.e. Cold War). To think it can be any other way and work is just a utopia. I'd rather have a democracy ruling the world (with all its flaws) through aggressive economical strategies than a totalitarian regime like the chinese, thank you very much. And um, last time I checked, socialism had been proven a failure.
  20. The thing is, threads don't get deleted because of spam. If spam is indeed plaguing the thread, it's simply pruned. What's spam is removed, and what's not stays so people can continue to engage on fruitful conversations. If the whole thread was removed it was because: The topic did start as spam, in which case it would have been deleted. The topic contained spoilers or wasn't in the appropriate forum, in which case it would have simply been moved. In any case, it's impossible I could have had one of your threads removed through spamming. So quit lying through the internet and go read something about Renaissance art.
  21. and I thought they did anything to get Lucas more money. er...should I have said that? Yeah, well. That would even make sense if they were planning to release the K2 soundtrack commercially, but that doesn't seem to be the case. So, no. They are just not allowing it for... absolutely no reason. It feels good to know you are supporting such a bunch of f*ckheads, doesn't it? Anyway, thanks both Meshugger and Akari.
  22. So much for classic culture.
  23. This thread had been dead for over a month until some newb went gravedigging so, who cares?
×
×
  • Create New...