213374U

My character is called Search. Search is your friend, you know.

You should get your eyes taken a look at.

True, when i tested my IQ, i got 132 (Am i stupid or smart? ) Only 2 points smarter than Bush? I'd be very worried if I were you, mate. :ph34r:

Nah, he just plays dumb so his enemies will underestimate him. :ph34r:

Doom 3 kind of got boring after lights dim, zombies come, zombies die then the cycle repeats itself. Ofcourse its entertaining because you can go trigger happy and shoot everybody. And HL2 is different how? Oh yeah, I forgot. Locations change and you can maul the poor things to death using the grav gun.

The closest thing you'll find to a 'guide' to the Old Republic are the TotJ comics. Supposedly KotOR was inspired somewhat by that series. AFAIK there are't any 'official' packages to help you set up a game like that. And as for fan-made packages, well, their guess is as good as yours. In PnP, creativity is your friend.

LOL. I won't pretend I know more than magistrates and economists, unlike you do. If MS is declared a monopoly in court, I'll believe it until it's proven otherwise. I agree, however, that pure monopolies may be hard to find, as it happens with all theoretical concepts. MS may not have been a pure monopoly, but it was a practical one, and that's what counts. But none of that really matters. Monopolies are good only for those running the monopoly. For the rest of us lowly mortals, they suck. Monopolies kill competence, which is the most important pillar of a free market. And that's basic economics theory. When I see a monopoly that's good for the average joe, I'll swallow my words. Until then you auto lose. Game over, and all that stuff you keep saying.

Predictable. Instead of coming up with ideas of your own, you just attack mine. But it doesn't matter since MS was legally declared a monopoly due to all that IE business. You auto lose. )

Define 'REAL' proof. You realize that due to the linear character of time it's impossible to prove something that hasn't happened yet, do you? Can you prove the sun will rise tomorrow? No, you can't. However, chances are it will. Now, based on logic and past similar experiences, you can make a prediction with a very high probabilty of it accurately descripting future events. MS is a perfect example of a monopoly. You can't deny that. Now, once a company has swept all competition, they can ask almost what they want for their product, without worrying too much about its quality, because there's nobody out there to dispute their market share. I have provided an example and a reasoning to back my claims. Now it's your turn to do the same. The ball is in your court. If you can't, you will 'auto lose'.

S P A M No, really.

Want proof of how monopolies have product quality decrease while at the same time increasing prices? Microsoft is all the proof you need. If EA is allowed to get a similar monopoly on sports games, the same thing is bound to happen. Monopolies are the dead end of rampant capitalism.

Keep going, you've already proven yourself a worthy spammer. Too bad I ran out of cookies.

One of the funniest things I've read in my time on these forums. S P A M <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Pot... Meet Kettle. S P A M

One of the funniest things I've read in my time on these forums. S P A M

Yeah, so going from having nice games at nice prices to having mediocre games at ridiculously high prices is indeed winning. Like it or not, that's what a monopoly means. Higher prices, lower overall product quality. And no, I could care less if you buy games or not. After all, if I don't feel like paying what a game's worth, I can just rent it, even PC titles. Can you say the same? )

Yet you're here discussing the finer points of a SW duel. Yeah right, you're not hardcore. You just like SW so very much. A defensive maneuver, yes. But performing a defensive maneuver to avoid being chopped in half is not being on the defensive. You might need to perform defensive maneuvers to counter an enemy's retaliation, which implies you're on the offensive. Exactly.

I think you mean Civ IV?

So, going backwards = being on the deffensive? Whoa, and here I thought that being on the defensive meant to concentrate on a defensive strategy rather than falling back a few steps. I thought that there was more to being on the defensive than parrying a few blows, that it involved a whole different fighting style. Obviously you would make a GREAT fencing master if you just stood your ground and only tried to stab the other guy without worrying about his weapon(s) when you were 'on the offensive'. Man, what a great fencer the world is missing. So says the Anakin fanboi. LMFAO

I'm going to enjoy seeing you pay twice what those games cost today. To each his own...

No. This topic needs to be locked and forgotten.

What's this BS? LA's adventure games just owned. DOTT, S&M, Full Throttle, and the Indy series were all excellent games.

It's incredible the extent to which some people will twist the truth to make a point.

I thought you weren't going to get the game?

You have no idea.

The pieces begin to fall into place now... "