Jump to content

213374U

Members
  • Posts

    5642
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

Everything posted by 213374U

  1. Why do you keep trying to prove the obvious?
  2. Well, it doesn't matter. For all I care, they can stay in my mountains all they want, my cavalry (or panzers) will be waiting for them just outside. I don't know about enemy roads not giving a bonus to speed. That's stupid at any rate. But even if they don't, that's only an advantage for you. You can move your troops faster than they can, thusly being able to plan your defense in advance. I don't see how you could need overwhelming numbers in order to provide effective defense.
  3. Are you sure you are playing Civilization 3?
  4. Asteroids don't concern me, Admiral. If only Lucas had been able to keep the pace of the beginning RotJ for the whole movie...
  5. You know... once you begin attacking each other's usernames, the quality of the flaming goes down real fast.
  6. That is why fast-moving units and planning your communications and fortress networks are important. The AI is very predictable, and won't cross through mountains to avoid your well fortified army. Odds are, they will follow the road to the fortification and then proceed to get effortlessly slaughtered against the walls. The importance of knowing the terrain around your own cities... " I agree. That's why I'd like some sort of supply line simulation to be included. No. As I said, even the most modern units can't move very fast in regular terrain. That gives you enough time to wake up your defenders and send them to your fortifications or prepare a good defensive strategy and call for reinforcements if necessary. And if they do use your roads/rail network, you should be ready to repel them with ease using artillery and infantry, regardless of the era.
  7. Now, now. We don't want any children having their progress capped, do we?
  8. Yep. You're just slow. Don't despair though. The first step in the way to improvement is to acknowledge one's flaws. And you really have a long way ahead.
  9. That would just not be realistic. There are no such "control zones" in real warfare. The only real limitations to troop movement are logistics and supply lines. I'd like the inclusion of such things in Civ4, but artificially limiting the way your troops can advance with "control zones" or "established fronts" would seriously decrease the strategical factor in Civ warfare.
  10. It's still one kickass jacket. Damn shame people can't let go.
  11. The music, for starters, was the best of all the prequels. The lightsaber fights were much better than the ones in RotS, too. Barring Maul's death, that is.
  12. For the nth time, I didn't post a virus, you dumbass. Get a clue.
  13. Praised be originality! That's the comeback you always use. What, are you told that often? Maybe that's why you feel the need to fake your age (and my quotes). "
  14. Judge? What, you mean I'm going to jail and stuff? Nooooooooooooooo!
  15. What? There was no link to begin with. I can fake quotes, too: ^_^
  16. I'm completely innocent. Jodo started it. He faked my quote to include some malicious content. And I'm the one being reported?
  17. Okay. Just click on the link, you should find something there, buddy.
  18. My main goal in Civ3 is to assemble an economy capable of supporting a massive army that will allow me to overrun the rest of the civs quickly... and simultaneously. Sadly enough, I never manage to do so before 2050. I guess I'm a poor administrator.
×
×
  • Create New...