Everything posted by 213374U
-
Turn-Based Strat?
It's always nice to be in agreement with an Obsidz VIP. ^_^
-
Bruce Lee VS Tyson
My god... you were serious. Take my advice. Get help.
-
Civ IV
Ever heard of the Spartans?
-
KotOR 3 confirmed!
Man, interbreeding is disgusting. And just think about their potential children!
-
The Fall is finally going to be released
I tried the euro version. It sucked, regardless of the bugs. You can dig up the thread, I'm not going to bother repeating myself. :thumbsdown: Why the hell isn't there a :thumbsdown: emote? Perhaps OE thought it would be too risky to have their boards feature one since it could be spammed in topics regarding their games?
-
Bruce Lee VS Tyson
Can't argue with that. :ph34r:
-
Bruce Lee VS Tyson
Right. But Lee's muscles can deliver only so much power unless you believe in dragon power or some of that crap. And that much power is not enough to knock down Tyson unless caught by surprise/delivered from behind. That shows just how uninformed you are. A boxer only blocks blows with his guard if he's either shortening distances to strike back, or trying to drain the opponent. Otherwise, he dodges. Saying that a boxer is limited to his hands is not true. Watch more boxing. I'd still not face a boxer that had his hands tied to his back. He can still headbutt your ass to the ground without breaking a sweat. And he can bite your ear off! I don't see why you would think that fighting without gloves is an advantage, since it's not the "pain" of the blow that knocks you out, but the kinetic energy delivered. And, given the chance to pick a weapon, Tyson wouldn't pick "knuckle punchers". He would pick a shotgun. "Street fights" lol...
-
Bruce Lee VS Tyson
With no arbiter to stop the fight, Tyson would kill Bruce. I almost took you seriously. Almost. You forgot to mention ninjas, though. He weighs less than average because he's shorter. Not because he's any less compact. Seriously, if you people think that Lee can knock out a professional, hardened heavyweight champion in one hit, you need to get out more, or watch more real martial arts fights. I'm not arguing that Lee could get in more hits, but when distances are shortened it always comes down to a blow exchange. And if Mike lands one, it's good night, Gracie.
-
KotOR 3 confirmed!
Well, obviously they don't consider this thread and the "malicious content" posted therein as dangerous as an all-out politics-based flame war.
-
Contaminate me with your intelligence
The Second Law of Thermodynamics states that the universe tends toward high levels of SPAM.
-
Bruce Lee VS Tyson
You are right. I'd bet Lee can run much faster than Tyson. Run, as in run away.
-
Bruce Lee VS Tyson
Not if your opponent has the equivalent of a kevlar vest... in raw muscle. Probably poor Bruce would bruise his little pink fists trying it.
-
K3: Quantity or quality?
"Most" as in 50(+1)%? And "a little" as in "I'd rather play other games than this one but I'd rather play this game that get my nuts caught in a meat grinder"? Such indefinition...
-
Explosion in London this morning
Then why do you keep replying? Just go be an attention whore elsewhere.
-
Explosion in London this morning
That's trolling. It's neither elegant, nor subtle or funny. Get the f*ck out. because you don't agree. oh, please, shut up newbie...
-
Contaminate me with your intelligence
I should register over there. Looks like fun.
-
Explosion in London this morning
Who said peace is impossible? Peace with religious fundamentalists is impossible, because that's the definition of a fundamentalist. They won't settle for nothing less than the destruction of our culture. When they do, they will no longer be fundamentalists. No, you showed true cowardice by refusing to fight for your way of life. Non sequitur. I am not judging the validity of anyone's opinions based on their experiences. You, on the other hand, claim that suffering that experience prevents you from making rational choices. Your arguments were just flawed before, now you're not even making sense. Libya, Iran, Saudi Arabia... ring a bell? I'm sure you can dig up a few more. Do I really have to go step by step? Perhaps a crayon drawing would do the trick? Jeez. Your position won't save you from terrorist attacks. That is a fact. That however, has nothing to do with soldiers dying on terrorist attacks because they're an occupying force in a country that had nothing to do with terrorism to begin with. You know, deductive reasoning is not about making random assumptions and then linking those to even more random conclusions through impossibly convoluted arguments. You should go out and have some fresh air. You're not making ANY sense. Let's see. Our being able to understand their irrationality doesn't preclude the fact that they are impervious to reason. And say what you will, but children raised in hatred can't be turned just with good words. And I didn't say they're evil, please leave your straw men for somebody that will appreciate them. No. I said it will create more potential terrorists. But a willing terrorist without the means to attack is nothing. Dumb people always laugh when they don't understand something.
-
Explosion in London this morning
REAL WORLD - Battle of Stalingrad "Millions of forces" lol...
-
Explosion in London this morning
Not anyone. You, for instance, are not a coward. You're just retarded. 150k men could easily have been the difference between winning and losing. You're not even trying.
-
Explosion in London this morning
Yeah, yeah. And your dad can beat up my dad, too. No one cares, really.
-
Bruce Lee VS Tyson
You know, I once saw a video of some uber 1337 martial artist try to pull off that trick (or a similar one) on a Vale Tudo fighter. Thirty seconds later, the martial artist was lying on the floor with his knee impossibly bent. Fighting experience always wins against fancy moves. Add to that Tyson's strength, endurance and reflexes, and you get...
-
Explosion in London this morning
Yes, it's propaganda. The same progressist, do-nothing, it's-our-fault, ideals-alone-will-win propaganda that most politicians have been spouting for the last years. It's not only getting old, it's been proven a fallacy. Get some new stuff, you're making me sick. This is a violent world. Sometimes it comes down to kill or be killed. Deal with it. And about calling you names, well, I guess nobody likes to openly admit their cowardice. Ah, right. So you have the "proper frame of mind" now that you barely have an idea of what you're talking about, but if you experienced it first-hand, then you would not be able to make rational decisions. Please. Wow, you sure are a master at dodging the issue. You know which countries harbor and support islamic terrorism. Quit playing games. An ill-planned war that had nothing to do with terrorism, as you have admitted yourself. Any other non sequitur you wish to make? Another non sequitur. What, are you getting tired or is it just that the feeble grasp you had on reality is finally giving up? Your previous statement was based on the assumption that islamic terrorists can be discouraged, by showing them they can't win. However, religious fanaticism isn't rational, because it's based on belief. This means that any logical reasons you may give them aren't going to work - they kill because they feel it's their holy duty to do so. This has nothing to do with logic and reason not being able to provide a solution for the problem. Keep trying, but not too hard. I wouldn't want you to hurt yourself and report me because of it. It's not a matter of revenge. It's a matter of self-defense. And while attacking them may generate more potential terrorists, they will have no way of comitting terrorist acts if we do our part well enough. As for the part of them seeing such and such, read above. Oh, and as a side note, that whole paragraph is a big contradiction. Great job. Losing Stalingrad would have shattered the Red Army. That is a widely accepted statement. If it wasn't for the Americans opening a second front in Africa, Germany would have had enough troops to take Stalingrad and the rest of the USSR would have fallen into line. Oh, wait. That's in the real world. In Nur Ab Sal's Wonder World, I don't know how the war went. That's trolling. It's neither elegant, nor subtle or funny. Get the f*ck out.
-
Explosion in London this morning
No. They'd probably suffer sanctions from some countries, but the US can't afford to put China under blockade, lest they want to risk economic collapse. It wouldn't be such a big deal.
-
Explosion in London this morning
No, I'm not suggesting it. But can you ensure the Chinese wouldn't do it if they were the constant target of terrorist attacks, as Israel is?
-
Bruce Lee VS Tyson
Right. That's why flyweight champions always beat the sh*t out of heavyweights. Boxers are used to both withstanding and dodging blows. And just one hook from Tyson would probably break a few bones to anyone without a comparable muscular mass. So... yeah.